2026 NPPES data Podiatrist NPI 1467564427 D.P.M.
Verify on CMS →

Mark Saathoff, D.P.M.

Podiatrist in Fort Madison, Iowa.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 10,602 in Podiatrist, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
90
Medicare Part D claims · 55 beneficiaries · Podiatrist avg: 320
MIPS score
88.8/100
▲ 5 pts above national avg 83.5 · Above neutral
Industry payments
$112
1 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)

What the federal data shows

Mark Saathoff, D.P.M. reported a CMS MIPS final score of 88.8/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 90 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

88.8/100
MIPS score · +5 vs avg
90
Part D claims, 2024
$112
industry payments (Sunshine Act)
≥54th
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Mark Saathoff, D.P.M.

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1467564427), first enumerated 08/31/2006.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 90 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 88.8/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Industry payment transparency

    $112 in reported industry payments (1 transfers) in 2024 under the federal Sunshine Act — disclosed transfers of value, not a quality rating.

    Source: CMS Open Payments

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1467564427 · Podiatrist

NPI-10 · ENUM-LEGACY · TAX-MID · MIPS-ABOVE · RX-TRACE · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1467564427
  • ENUM-LEGACY 2006
  • TAX-MID 11K Podiatrist
  • MIPS-ABOVE 88.8/100
  • RX-TRACE 90
  • BOOK-THIN 122 in Iowa
  • PHOTO-FINISH Robert Iannacone · ±0.1

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Mark Saathoff, D.P.M.'s MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

89 ≥ 54th percentile 54% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). This entry sits in this band. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Mark Saathoff, D.P.M. sits

This provider among podiatrist peers

Across the 2,362 podiatrist providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Mark Saathoff, D.P.M. writes more Part D claims than 22% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 71% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Mark Saathoff, D.P.M., Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 71
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one podiatrist peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Mark Saathoff, D.P.M.. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Mark Saathoff, D.P.M.?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 08/31/2006

NPI 1467564427

Primary specialty

Podiatrist

Mid-sized

10,602 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

90 72% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 320

MIPS final score

88.8/100 5.3 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Iowa

How Podiatrist compares to other specialties among Iowa providers

Iowa providers
Pharmacist6.5%Physical Therapist5.4%Mental Health Counselor5%Family Medicine Physician4.7%Clinical Social Worker4.2%Chiropractor4.1%Podiatrist0.2%
Largest specialties in Iowa (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Mark Saathoff, D.P.M.'s 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Podiatrist national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
88.8/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%88.8%
MIPS final score (Podiatrist) - 88.8/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

702 23RD ST
Fort Madison, IA 52627

Provider Details

NPI 1467564427
Specialty Podiatrist
Credentials D.P.M.
Gender Male
NPI Issued 08/31/2006

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

88.8056
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
77.6112
Quality

Reporting: Individual

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Mark Saathoff, D.P.M.. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$112

Largest payer

DJO, LLC

Most common payment type

Education

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

90
Total Claims
$571
Total Drug Cost
55
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
92.5
Total Day Supply
1,036
Brand Drug Cost
$0
Generic Drug Cost
$571
Antibiotic Claims
71

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
73.4 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.45
Gender Split
62% female / 38% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

Drug Claims
Cephalexin
48

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Podiatrist Overview

How Mark Saathoff, D.P.M. fits within the Podiatrist landscape nationally.

10,602
Podiatrist Providers in US
54
States with Podiatrist
320
Avg Claims per Provider

Mark Saathoff, D.P.M.'s 90 claims are below the specialty average of 320.

Nationwide Podiatrist peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Saathoff, both outside Iowa so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (88.8 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2006)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Podiatrist Providers in Iowa

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Iowa, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Saathoff.

One of 122 Podiatrist providers enrolled in Iowa, 5 are shown here.

Compare Podiatrist nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Mark Saathoff, D.P.M.'s specialty?
Mark Saathoff, D.P.M. specializes in Podiatrist and practices in Fort Madison, Iowa. Credentials: D.P.M..
How much does Mark Saathoff, D.P.M. prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Mark Saathoff, D.P.M. wrote 90 Medicare Part D claims totaling $571 in drug costs for 55 beneficiaries.
What is Mark Saathoff, D.P.M.'s Medicare quality score?
Mark Saathoff, D.P.M. has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 88.8/100 (Quality: 77.6). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Mark Saathoff, D.P.M. located?
Mark Saathoff, D.P.M. is located at 702 23RD ST, Fort Madison, IA, 52627. Phone: (319) 372-2105.
What is Mark Saathoff, D.P.M.'s NPI number?
Mark Saathoff, D.P.M.'s National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1467564427, issued on 08/31/2006.
How many Podiatrist providers are there in the US?
There are 10,602 Podiatrist providers across 54 states in the US. The average Podiatrist provider writes 320 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Mark Saathoff, D.P.M. prescribe most often?
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Mark Saathoff, D.P.M.'s most frequently prescribed drugs include Cephalexin. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Mark Saathoff, D.P.M. accept Medicare?
Mark Saathoff, D.P.M. appears in CMS Medicare data with 90 Part D claims and 55 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Mark Saathoff, D.P.M.'s credentials?
Mark Saathoff, D.P.M.'s NPI is 1467564427 with credentials D.P.M.. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.