2026 NPPES data Gynecologic Oncology Physician NPI 1902902760 MD
Verify on CMS →

Mary Cunningham, MD

Gynecologic Oncology Physician in Syracuse, New York.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 1,364 in Gynecologic Oncology Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
101
Medicare Part D claims · 45 beneficiaries · Gynecologic Oncology Physician avg: 188
Generic prescribing
82%
generic claims · 18% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
86.7/100
▲ 4 pts above national avg 83.1 · Above neutral
Industry payments
$220.69
3 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Mary Cunningham, MD reported a CMS MIPS final score of 86.7/100 - above the 83.1 national average - and filed 101 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

86.7/100
MIPS score · +4 vs avg
101
Part D claims, 2023
82%
generic prescribing
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Mary Cunningham, MD's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure

87 Top 48% higher than 52% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). This entry sits in this band. 90+: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Mary Cunningham, MD sits

This provider among gynecologic oncology physician peers

Across the 446 gynecologic oncology physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Mary Cunningham, MD writes more Part D claims than 39% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 49% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePart D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Mary Cunningham, MD-Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 39 · MIPS quality, percentile: 49
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one gynecologic oncology physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Mary Cunningham, MD. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Mary Cunningham, MD practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting + 1 hospital affiliation - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Mary Cunningham, MD?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 09/16/2006

NPI 1902902760

Primary specialty

Gynecologic Oncology Physician

Niche

1,364 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

101 46% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 188

MIPS final score

86.7/100 3.6 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in New York

How Gynecologic Oncology Physician compares to other specialties among New York providers

New York providers
Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program - 7.8%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program7.8%Registered Nurse - 5.2%Registered Nurse5.2%Clinical Social Worker - 4.9%Clinical Social Worker4.9%Social Worker - 4.5%Social Worker4.5%Speech-Language Pathologist - 4.5%Speech-Language Pathologist4.5%Licensed Practical Nurse - 4.3%Licensed Practical Nurse4.3%Gynecologic Oncology Physician - 0%Gynecologic Oncology Physician0%
Largest specialties in New York (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Mary Cunningham, MD's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Gynecologic Oncology Physician national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
86.7/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Gynecologic Oncology Physician) - 86.7/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%86.7%
MIPS final score (Gynecologic Oncology Physician) - 86.7/100 vs national avg 83.1
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Mary Cunningham, MD appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Gynecologic Oncology Physician provider holding MD credentials at 475 IRVING AVE STE 204, Syracuse, NY, 13210, with a listed phone of (315) 634-4112. NPI 1902902760 was issued on 09/16/2006.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 101 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 45 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $41K in drug spend, split 18% brand-name and 82% generic by claim count. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 86.7/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 96.6, Cost 55.2), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Gynecologic Oncology Physician is a narrow specialty nationwide, with 1,364 enrolled providers across 49 states and an average of 188 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline.

Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist, always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

475 IRVING AVE STE 204
Syracuse, NY 13210

Provider Details

NPI 1902902760
Specialty Gynecologic Oncology Physician
Credentials MD
Gender Female
NPI Issued 09/16/2006

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

86.6951
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
96.5924
Quality
55.18
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Mary Cunningham, MD bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

University Ob/gyn Associates
Syracuse, NY

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Mary Cunningham, MD. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$221

Largest payer

GlaxoSmithKline, LLC.

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

License & disciplinary context - New York NYSBPMC 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~100K New York medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Mary Cunningham, MD. To verify Mary Cunningham, MD's current license status, search the NYSBPMC public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

312
Total board actions, New York 2023
Across 302 cases
3.12
Actions per 1,000 licensees
New York statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
89 cases

NYSBPMC publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the New York disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Typical

Mary Cunningham, MD - brand share 18.0%
Gynecologic Oncology Physician average

18% brand-name claims vs 82% generic, on 101 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

101
Total Claims
$41K
Total Drug Cost
45
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
115
Total Day Supply
2,599
Brand vs Generic
18% brand / 82% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$38K
Generic Drug Cost
$2K
Antibiotic Claims
11

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
72.6 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.69
Gender Split
100% female / 0% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

Drug Claims
Gabapentin
14

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Gynecologic Oncology Physician Overview

How Mary Cunningham, MD fits within the Gynecologic Oncology Physician landscape nationally.

1,364
Gynecologic Oncology Physician Providers in US
49
States with Gynecologic Oncology Physician
188
Avg Claims per Provider

Mary Cunningham, MD's 101 claims are below the specialty average of 188.

Nearby Gynecologic Oncology Physician Providers in New York

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in New York, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Cunningham.

Compare Gynecologic Oncology Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry, providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the New York medical board, federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Gynecologic Oncology Physician peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only, they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Mary Cunningham, MD's specialty?
Mary Cunningham, MD specializes in Gynecologic Oncology Physician and practices in Syracuse, New York. Credentials: MD.
How much does Mary Cunningham, MD prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Mary Cunningham, MD wrote 101 Medicare Part D claims totaling $41K in drug costs for 45 beneficiaries.
What is Mary Cunningham, MD's Medicare quality score?
Mary Cunningham, MD has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 86.7/100 (Quality: 96.6, Cost: 55.2). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Mary Cunningham, MD located?
Mary Cunningham, MD is located at 475 IRVING AVE STE 204, Syracuse, NY, 13210. Phone: (315) 634-4112.
What is Mary Cunningham, MD's NPI number?
Mary Cunningham, MD's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1902902760, issued on 09/16/2006.
Does Mary Cunningham, MD prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Mary Cunningham, MD's prescribing is 18% brand-name and 82% generic drugs by claim count, with $38K in brand drug costs.
How many Gynecologic Oncology Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 1,364 Gynecologic Oncology Physician providers across 49 states in the US. The average Gynecologic Oncology Physician provider writes 188 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Mary Cunningham, MD prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Mary Cunningham, MD's most frequently prescribed drugs include Gabapentin. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Mary Cunningham, MD accept Medicare?
Mary Cunningham, MD appears in CMS Medicare data with 101 Part D claims and 45 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Mary Cunningham, MD's credentials?
Mary Cunningham, MD's NPI is 1902902760 with credentials MD. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.