2026 NPPES data Acute Care Nurse Practitioner NPI 1841605862 AG-ACNP
Verify on CMS →

Matthew Bean, AG-ACNP

Acute Care Nurse Practitioner in Mobile, Alabama.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 25,345 in Acute Care Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
2K
Medicare Part D claims · 631 beneficiaries · Acute Care Nurse Practitioner avg: 623
Generic prescribing
>99%
generic claims · <1% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
71/100
▼ 13 pts below national avg 83.5 · Mid-tier
Industry payments
$471.41
17 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)

What the federal data shows

Matthew Bean, AG-ACNP reported a CMS MIPS final score of 71/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 2,378 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

71/100
MIPS score · -13 vs avg
2K
Part D claims, 2024
>99%
generic prescribing
$471.41
industry payments (Sunshine Act)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Matthew Bean, AG-ACNP

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1841605862), first enumerated 06/28/2014.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 2,378 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 71/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Industry payment transparency

    $471.41 in reported industry payments (17 transfers) in 2024 under the federal Sunshine Act — disclosed transfers of value, not a quality rating.

    Source: CMS Open Payments

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1841605862 · Acute Care Nurse Practitioner

NPI-10 · ENUM-MID · TAX-MID · MIPS-LOW · RX-MID · BOOK-LIGHT · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1841605862
  • ENUM-MID 2014
  • TAX-MID 25K Acute Care
  • MIPS-LOW 71/100
  • RX-MID 2,378
  • BOOK-LIGHT 890 in Alabama
  • PHOTO-FINISH Steven Arnold, ACNP · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Matthew Bean, AG-ACNP's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

71 ≥ 9th percentile 9% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). This entry sits in this band. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Matthew Bean, AG-ACNP sits

This provider among acute care nurse practitioner peers

Across the 3,830 acute care nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Matthew Bean, AG-ACNP writes more Part D claims than 94% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 4% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100023.146.269.392.4Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Matthew Bean, AG-ACNP, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 94 · MIPS quality, percentile: 4
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one acute care nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Matthew Bean, AG-ACNP. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Matthew Bean, AG-ACNP?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 06/28/2014

NPI 1841605862

Primary specialty

Acute Care Nurse Practitioner

Mid-sized

25,345 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

2,378 282% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 623

MIPS final score

71/100 12.5 pts vs avg

Mid-tier band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Alabama

How Acute Care Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among Alabama providers

Alabama providers
Student in an Organized Heal…8.4%Pharmacist6.6%Family Nurse Practitioner5.9%Behavior Technician4.7%Physical Therapist4.2%Mental Health Counselor3.4%Acute Care Nurse Practitioner1.3%
Largest specialties in Alabama (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Matthew Bean, AG-ACNP's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Acute Care Nurse Practitioner national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
71/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%71%
MIPS final score (Acute Care Nurse Practitioner) - 71/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

3610 SPRINGHILL MEMORIAL DR N
Mobile, AL 36608

Provider Details

NPI 1841605862
Specialty Acute Care Nurse Practitioner
Credentials AG-ACNP
Gender Male
NPI Issued 06/28/2014

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

70.989
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
64.745
Quality
51.8849
Cost
84
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Matthew Bean, AG-ACNP. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$471

Largest payer

Baxter Healthcare

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Generic-heavy

Matthew Bean, AG-ACNP - brand share 1.0%
Acute Care Nurse Practitioner average

<1% brand-name claims vs >99% generic, on 2,378 2024 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

2,378
Total Claims
$49K
Total Drug Cost
631
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
2,655.167
Total Day Supply
66,358
Brand vs Generic
<1% brand / >99% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$11K
Generic Drug Cost
$37K
Opioid Claims
780 (32.8% rate)

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
69.1 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.32
Gender Split
66% female / 34% male
Age Distribution
<65: 151, 65-74: 295, 75-84: 153, 85+: 32

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Matthew Bean, AG-ACNP prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Tramadol Hcl
476
Gabapentin
340
Methocarbamol
198
Tizanidine Hcl
184
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen
Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen
177
Cyclobenzaprine Hcl
155
Meloxicam
113
Methylprednisolone
105
Diclofenac Sodium
97
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen
Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen
81

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Matthew Bean, AG-ACNP fits within the Acute Care Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

25,345
Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
53
States with Acute Care Nurse Practitioner
623
Avg Claims per Provider

Matthew Bean, AG-ACNP's 2,378 claims are above the specialty average of 623.

Nationwide Acute Care Nurse Practitioner peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Bean, both outside Alabama so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (71 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2014)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Providers in Alabama

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Alabama, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Bean.

One of 890 Acute Care Nurse Practitioner providers enrolled in Alabama, 5 are shown here.

Compare Acute Care Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Matthew Bean, AG-ACNP's specialty?
Matthew Bean, AG-ACNP specializes in Acute Care Nurse Practitioner and practices in Mobile, Alabama. Credentials: AG-ACNP.
How much does Matthew Bean, AG-ACNP prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Matthew Bean, AG-ACNP wrote 2,378 Medicare Part D claims totaling $49K in drug costs for 631 beneficiaries.
What is Matthew Bean, AG-ACNP's Medicare quality score?
Matthew Bean, AG-ACNP has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 71/100 (Quality: 64.7, Cost: 51.9). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Matthew Bean, AG-ACNP located?
Matthew Bean, AG-ACNP is located at 3610 SPRINGHILL MEMORIAL DR N, Mobile, AL, 36608. Phone: (251) 410-3600.
What is Matthew Bean, AG-ACNP's NPI number?
Matthew Bean, AG-ACNP's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1841605862, issued on 06/28/2014.
Does Matthew Bean, AG-ACNP prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Matthew Bean, AG-ACNP's prescribing is <1% brand-name and >99% generic drugs by claim count, with $11K in brand drug costs.
Does Matthew Bean, AG-ACNP prescribe opioids?
Yes, Matthew Bean, AG-ACNP had 780 opioid claims in 2024 with an opioid prescribing rate of 32.8%.
How many Acute Care Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US?
There are 25,345 Acute Care Nurse Practitioner providers across 53 states in the US. The average Acute Care Nurse Practitioner provider writes 623 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Matthew Bean, AG-ACNP prescribe most often?
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Matthew Bean, AG-ACNP's most frequently prescribed drugs include Tramadol Hcl, Gabapentin, Methocarbamol. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Matthew Bean, AG-ACNP accept Medicare?
Matthew Bean, AG-ACNP appears in CMS Medicare data with 2,378 Part D claims and 631 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Matthew Bean, AG-ACNP's credentials?
Matthew Bean, AG-ACNP's NPI is 1841605862 with credentials AG-ACNP. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.