2026 NPPES data Otology & Neurotology Physician NPI 1144630062 MD
Verify on CMS →

Matthew Shew, MD

Otology & Neurotology Physician in Saint Louis, Missouri.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 344 in Otology & Neurotology Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
249
Medicare Part D claims · 109 beneficiaries · Otology & Neurotology Physician avg: 421
MIPS score
79.3/100
▼ 4 pts below national avg 83.5 · Above neutral
Industry payments
$767.14
9 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)

What the federal data shows

Matthew Shew, MD reported a CMS MIPS final score of 79.3/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 249 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

79.3/100
MIPS score · -4 vs avg
249
Part D claims, 2024
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)
≥26th
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Matthew Shew, MD

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1144630062), first enumerated 04/30/2014.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 249 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 79.3/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Board certification signal

    Heuristic suggests board-certified status based on ABMS-eligible specialty taxonomy plus active CMS participation signals — not a direct ABMS verification.

    Source: NUCC taxonomy + CMS participation heuristic

  • Reported

    Hospital affiliations

    1 CMS Care Compare hospital affiliation on record — practice footprint from the Doctors and Clinicians file.

    Source: CMS Care Compare

  • Reported

    Industry payment transparency

    $767.14 in reported industry payments (9 transfers) in 2024 under the federal Sunshine Act — disclosed transfers of value, not a quality rating.

    Source: CMS Open Payments

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1144630062 · Otology & Neurotology Physician

NPI-10 · ENUM-MID · TAX-TRACE · MIPS-BELOW · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1144630062
  • ENUM-MID 2014
  • TAX-TRACE 344
  • MIPS-BELOW 79.3/100
  • RX-LIGHT 249
  • BOOK-THIN 10 in Missouri
  • PHOTO-FINISH Zaid Al-Qurayshi, MD · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Matthew Shew, MD's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

79 ≥ 26th percentile 26% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). This entry sits in this band. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Matthew Shew, MD sits

This provider among otology & neurotology physician peers

Across the 113 otology & neurotology physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Matthew Shew, MD writes more Part D claims than 43% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 39% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.949.974.899.8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Matthew Shew, MD, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 39
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one otology & neurotology physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Matthew Shew, MD. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Matthew Shew, MD practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting + 1 hospital affiliation - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Matthew Shew, MD?

Near national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 04/30/2014

NPI 1144630062

Primary specialty

Otology & Neurotology Physician

Rare

344 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

249 41% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 421

MIPS final score

79.3/100 4.2 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Missouri

How Otology & Neurotology Physician compares to other specialties among Missouri providers

Missouri providers
Professional Counselor4.8%Pharmacist4.8%Clinical Social Worker4.5%Speech-Language Pathologist4.5%Family Nurse Practitioner4.3%Physical Therapist4%Otology & Neurotology Physic…0%
Largest specialties in Missouri (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Matthew Shew, MD's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Otology & Neurotology Physician national average

Near national average
MIPS Final Score
79.3/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%79.3%
MIPS final score (Otology & Neurotology Physician) - 79.3/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

4921 PARKVIEW PL
Saint Louis, MO 63110

Provider Details

NPI 1144630062
Specialty Otology & Neurotology Physician
Credentials MD
Gender Male
NPI Issued 04/30/2014

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

79.292
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
71.46
Quality
59.5132
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Matthew Shew, MD bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Washington University
Saint Louis, MO

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Matthew Shew, MD. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$767

Largest payer

Advanced Bionics, LLC

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

249
Total Claims
$7K
Total Drug Cost
109
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
281.733
Total Day Supply
5,068
Generic Drug Cost
$6K
Antibiotic Claims
27

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
70.0 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.67
Gender Split
57% female / 43% male
Age Distribution
<65: 20, 65-74: 53, 75-84: N/A, 85+: N/A

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Matthew Shew, MD prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Ofloxacin
93
Ciprofloxacin-Dexamethasone
Ciprofloxacin Hcl/Dexameth
19
Prednisone
19
Triamterene-Hydrochlorothiazid
Triamterene/Hydrochlorothiazid
18
Azelastine Hcl
16
Amoxicillin-Clavulanate Potass
Amoxicillin/Potassium Clav
11

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Otology & Neurotology Physician Overview

How Matthew Shew, MD fits within the Otology & Neurotology Physician landscape nationally.

344
Otology & Neurotology Physician Providers in US
47
States with Otology & Neurotology Physician
421
Avg Claims per Provider

Matthew Shew, MD's 249 claims are below the specialty average of 421.

Nationwide Otology & Neurotology Physician peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Shew, both outside Missouri so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (79.3 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2014)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Otology & Neurotology Physician Providers in Missouri

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Missouri, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Shew.

One of 10 Otology & Neurotology Physician providers enrolled in Missouri, 5 are shown here.

Compare Otology & Neurotology Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Matthew Shew, MD's specialty?
Matthew Shew, MD specializes in Otology & Neurotology Physician and practices in Saint Louis, Missouri. Credentials: MD.
How much does Matthew Shew, MD prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Matthew Shew, MD wrote 249 Medicare Part D claims totaling $7K in drug costs for 109 beneficiaries.
What is Matthew Shew, MD's Medicare quality score?
Matthew Shew, MD has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 79.3/100 (Quality: 71.5, Cost: 59.5). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Matthew Shew, MD located?
Matthew Shew, MD is located at 4921 PARKVIEW PL, Saint Louis, MO, 63110. Phone: (314) 362-7509.
What is Matthew Shew, MD's NPI number?
Matthew Shew, MD's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1144630062, issued on 04/30/2014.
How many Otology & Neurotology Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 344 Otology & Neurotology Physician providers across 47 states in the US. The average Otology & Neurotology Physician provider writes 421 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Matthew Shew, MD prescribe most often?
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Matthew Shew, MD's most frequently prescribed drugs include Ofloxacin, Ciprofloxacin-Dexamethasone, Prednisone. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Matthew Shew, MD accept Medicare?
Matthew Shew, MD appears in CMS Medicare data with 249 Part D claims and 109 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Matthew Shew, MD's credentials?
Matthew Shew, MD's NPI is 1144630062 with credentials MD. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.