2026 NPPES data Nurse Practitioner NPI 1356016166 APNP
Verify on CMS →

Megan Keesey, APNP

Nurse Practitioner in Barneveld, Wisconsin.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 87,700 in Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
1K
Medicare Part D claims · 182 beneficiaries · Nurse Practitioner avg: 1K
Generic prescribing
85%
generic claims · 13% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
97.7/100
▲ 15 pts above national avg 83.1 · Exceptional
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Megan Keesey, APNP reported a CMS MIPS final score of 97.7/100 - above the 83.1 national average - and filed 1,419 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

97.7/100
MIPS score · +15 vs avg
1K
Part D claims, 2023
85%
generic prescribing

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Megan Keesey, APNP's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure

98 Top 15% higher than 85% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Below this entry. 90+: 189,403 scored providers (40%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Megan Keesey, APNP sits

This provider among nurse practitioner peers

Across the 13,476 nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Megan Keesey, APNP writes more Part D claims than 77% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 90% - placing this provider in the high-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.148.372.496.6Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePart D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Megan Keesey, APNP-Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Megan Keesey, APNP. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Megan Keesey, APNP?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 08/13/2021

NPI 1356016166

Primary specialty

Nurse Practitioner

High-volume

87,700 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

1,419 31% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,084

MIPS final score

97.7/100 14.6 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Wisconsin

How Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among Wisconsin providers

Wisconsin providers
Physical Therapist - 5.6%Physical Therapist5.6%Pharmacist - 4.8%Pharmacist4.8%Registered Nurse - 4.5%Registered Nurse4.5%Professional Counselor - 3.3%Professional Counselor3.3%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program - 3.3%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program3.3%Family Medicine Physician - 3.2%Family Medicine Physician3.2%Nurse Practitioner - 3%Nurse Practitioner3%
Largest specialties in Wisconsin (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Megan Keesey, APNP's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Nurse Practitioner national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
97.7/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Nurse Practitioner) - 97.7/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%97.7%
MIPS final score (Nurse Practitioner) - 97.7/100 vs national avg 83.1
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Megan Keesey, APNP appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Nurse Practitioner provider holding APNP credentials at 103 QUAIL RIDGE DR, Barneveld, WI, 53507, with a listed phone of (608) 924-1088. NPI 1356016166 was issued on 08/13/2021.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 1,419 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 182 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $105K in drug spend, split 13% brand-name and 85% generic by claim count, with an opioid prescribing rate of 4.1%. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 97.7/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 95.8), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Nurse Practitioner is a high-volume specialty nationwide, with 87,700 enrolled providers across 56 states and an average of 1,084 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline.

Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist, always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

103 QUAIL RIDGE DR
Barneveld, WI 53507

Provider Details

NPI 1356016166
Specialty Nurse Practitioner
Credentials APNP
Gender Female
NPI Issued 08/13/2021

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

97.7172
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
95.8494
Quality
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Megan Keesey, APNP bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Upland Hills Health Inc
Barneveld, WI

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Typical

Megan Keesey, APNP - brand share 13.0%
Nurse Practitioner average

13% brand-name claims vs 85% generic, on 1,419 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

1,419
Total Claims
$105K
Total Drug Cost
182
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
2,889
Total Day Supply
80,935
Brand vs Generic
13% brand / 85% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$82K
Generic Drug Cost
$22K
Opioid Claims
58 (4.1% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
77

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
72.4 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
0.99
Gender Split
65% female / 35% male
Age Distribution
<65: 16, 65-74: 96, 75-84: 55, 85+: 15

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Megan Keesey, APNP prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Atorvastatin Calcium
100
Omeprazole
66
Prednisone
56
Hydrochlorothiazide
47
Levothyroxine Sodium
46
Amlodipine Besylate
35
Lisinopril
33
Metoprolol Succinate
33
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen
Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen
31
Losartan Potassium
31

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Megan Keesey, APNP fits within the Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

87,700
Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
56
States with Nurse Practitioner
1,084
Avg Claims per Provider

Megan Keesey, APNP's 1,419 claims are above the specialty average of 1,084.

Nearby Nurse Practitioner Providers in Wisconsin

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Wisconsin, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Keesey.

Compare Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry, providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Wisconsin medical board, federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Nurse Practitioner peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only, they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Megan Keesey, APNP's specialty?
Megan Keesey, APNP specializes in Nurse Practitioner and practices in Barneveld, Wisconsin. Credentials: APNP.
How much does Megan Keesey, APNP prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Megan Keesey, APNP wrote 1,419 Medicare Part D claims totaling $105K in drug costs for 182 beneficiaries.
What is Megan Keesey, APNP's Medicare quality score?
Megan Keesey, APNP has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 97.7/100 (Quality: 95.8). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Megan Keesey, APNP located?
Megan Keesey, APNP is located at 103 QUAIL RIDGE DR, Barneveld, WI, 53507. Phone: (608) 924-1088.
What is Megan Keesey, APNP's NPI number?
Megan Keesey, APNP's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1356016166, issued on 08/13/2021.
Does Megan Keesey, APNP prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Megan Keesey, APNP's prescribing is 13% brand-name and 85% generic drugs by claim count, with $82K in brand drug costs.
Does Megan Keesey, APNP prescribe opioids?
Yes, Megan Keesey, APNP had 58 opioid claims in 2023 with an opioid prescribing rate of 4.1%.
How many Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US?
There are 87,700 Nurse Practitioner providers across 56 states in the US. The average Nurse Practitioner provider writes 1,084 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Megan Keesey, APNP prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Megan Keesey, APNP's most frequently prescribed drugs include Atorvastatin Calcium, Omeprazole, Prednisone. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Megan Keesey, APNP accept Medicare?
Megan Keesey, APNP appears in CMS Medicare data with 1,419 Part D claims and 182 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Megan Keesey, APNP's credentials?
Megan Keesey, APNP's NPI is 1356016166 with credentials APNP. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.