Meghan Vita, ARNP
Registered Nurse in Seattle, Washington.
This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 177,204 in Registered Nurse, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.
Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File, 2023
What the federal data shows
Meghan Vita, ARNP reported a CMS MIPS final score of 82.8/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 326 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.
- 82.8/100
- MIPS score · -1 vs avg
- 326
- Part D claims, 2023
- 87%
- generic prescribing
- ≥36th
- pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)
Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.
CMS NPPES provider registry desk
NPI 1548689334 · Registered Nurse
NPI-10 · ENUM-MID · TAX-MEGA · MIPS-INLINE · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-MID · PHOTO-FINISH
- NPI-10 1548689334
- ENUM-MID 2014
- TAX-MEGA 177K Registered Nurse
- MIPS-INLINE 82.8/100
- RX-LIGHT 326
- BOOK-MID 6,791 in Washington
- PHOTO-FINISH Jessica Rands · ±0.0
MIPS final-score neighbourhood
Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity
- Vita · this prov…
Vita · this provider
82.8 MIPS pts
- Jessica Rands · …
Jessica Rands
82.8 MIPS pts
- Brian Goode · hi…
Brian Goode
82.9 MIPS pts
- John Bubb · near
John Bubb
82.9 MIPS pts
- Jennifer Vernon …
Jennifer Vernon
82.9 MIPS pts
What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).
Meghan Vita, ARNP's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.
83 ≥ 36th percentile 36% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.
Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023
Where Meghan Vita, ARNP sits
This provider among registered nurse peers
Across the 3,271 registered nurse providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Meghan Vita, ARNP writes more Part D claims than 50% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 39% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.
Each dot is one registered nurse peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Meghan Vita, ARNP. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.
What does the federal data show about Meghan Vita, ARNP?
Near national averagePrimary specialty
Medicare Part D claims
MIPS final score
Specialty distribution in Washington
How Registered Nurse compares to other specialties among Washington providers
Registered Nurse ranks #8 among Washington's specialties (3.4% of in-state providers)
Each bar is a specialty's share of the Washington provider total, by primary NUCC taxonomy. The highlighted bar is Registered Nurse; the long tail of smaller specialties is omitted for legibility.
Medicare quality performance, MIPS
Meghan Vita, ARNP's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Registered Nurse national average
- MIPS Final Score
- 82.8/100
- vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
Quality benchmarks
- National MIPS avg 2023 measured reporting year
- Quality dim CMS Quality category
- Cost dim CMS Cost category
- Specialty volume Registered Nurse US NPIs
82.8/100 MIPS final score - 0.7 pts below the 83.5 national average
Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities composite score for the 2023 performance year. Specialty: Registered Nurse. Quality dim: 82.1. Cost dim: 60.7.
How MIPS and board certification work
The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.
Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).
Practice Address
Provider Details
| NPI | 1548689334 |
|---|---|
| Specialty | Registered Nurse |
| Credentials | ARNP |
| Gender | Female |
| NPI Issued | 04/09/2014 |
Verify this provider's license
PlainDoctor pulls this profile from the CMS NPPES public registry. Confirm Meghan Vita, ARNP's current license status, disciplinary history, and board certifications with the Washington State Department of Health, Medical Quality Assurance Commission in Washington before relying on this page for a clinical or care decision.
How we sourced this profile
Profile fields combine the CMS NPPES monthly snapshot (provider directory, taxonomy, and address) with calendar-year 2023 Medicare Part D and MIPS public-use files when records are present. NPI 1548689334 is the unique 10-digit identifier CMS uses to link Vita across every Medicare, Medicaid, and HIPAA-covered transaction. Read full methodology →
CMS Quality Score (MIPS)
Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.
Reporting: Group practice
Hospital and facility affiliations
Facilities where Meghan Vita, ARNP bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.
Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).
License & disciplinary context - Washington WMC 2023 annual report
Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~34K Washington medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Meghan Vita, ARNP. To verify Meghan Vita, ARNP's current license status, search the WMC public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.
WMC publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Washington disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.
Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Generic-heavy
8% brand-name claims vs 87% generic, on 326 2023 Medicare Part D claims.
The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.
Medicare Part D Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.
Prescribing Breakdown
- 30-Day Fills
- 453
- Total Day Supply
- 13,222
- Brand vs Generic
- 8% brand / 87% generic
- Brand Drug Cost
- $11K
- Generic Drug Cost
- $7K
- Antibiotic Claims
- 11
Patient Demographics
- Average Patient Age
- 56.9 years
- Avg HCC Risk Score
- 7.08
- Gender Split
- 49% female / 51% male
- Age Distribution
- <65: 29, 65-74: 20, 75-84: N/A, 85+: N/A
Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)
Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.
What Meghan Vita, ARNP prescribes most
Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023
- Amlodipine Besylate
Amlodipine Besylate
32 claims
- Calcitriol
Calcitriol
30 claims
- Famotidine
Famotidine
26 claims
- Pantoprazole Sodium
Pantoprazole Sodium
24 claims
- Atorvastatin Calcium
Atorvastatin Calcium
18 claims
- Prednisone
Prednisone
16 claims
- Cinacalcet Hcl 12
Cinacalcet Hcl
12 claims
- Glipizide 12
Glipizide
12 claims
| Drug | Claims |
|---|---|
| Amlodipine Besylate | 32 |
| Calcitriol | 30 |
| Famotidine | 26 |
| Pantoprazole Sodium | 24 |
| Atorvastatin Calcium | 18 |
| Prednisone | 16 |
| Cinacalcet Hcl | 12 |
| Glipizide | 12 |
| Carvedilol | 11 |
| Omeprazole | 11 |
* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.
Registered Nurse Overview
How Meghan Vita, ARNP fits within the Registered Nurse landscape nationally.
Meghan Vita, ARNP's 326 claims are below the specialty average of 1,000.
Nationwide Registered Nurse peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year
Two federal-record peer sets for Vita, both outside Washington so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.
Similar MIPS final score
Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (82.8 here).
Same NPPES enumeration year (2014)
Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.
Nearby Registered Nurse Providers in Washington
Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Washington, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Vita.
One of 6,791 Registered Nurse providers enrolled in Washington, 5 are shown here.
Compare Registered Nurse nationally: see state-by-state distribution →
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Meghan Vita, ARNP's specialty? ▼
How much does Meghan Vita, ARNP prescribe under Medicare Part D? ▼
What is Meghan Vita, ARNP's Medicare quality score? ▼
Where is Meghan Vita, ARNP located? ▼
What is Meghan Vita, ARNP's NPI number? ▼
Does Meghan Vita, ARNP prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs? ▼
How many Registered Nurse providers are there in the US? ▼
What drugs does Meghan Vita, ARNP prescribe most often? ▼
Does Meghan Vita, ARNP accept Medicare? ▼
How can I verify Meghan Vita, ARNP's credentials? ▼
Data Sources
View source datasets and methodology notes
- Provider Directory
- CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
- Specialty Classification
- NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
- Prescribing Data
- CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
- Quality Performance
- CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
- Limitations
- Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.
See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.
Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).
Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology
Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.
Published by
PlainDoctor
Independent public-data reference that compiles, verifies, and contextualizes official datasets. We do not accept compensation from entities we cover, and every dataset cites its originating public source.