2026 NPPES data Nurse Practitioner NPI 1235897422 APRN
Verify on CMS →

Melissa Dearing, APRN

Nurse Practitioner in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 89,808 in Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
45
Medicare Part D claims · 34 beneficiaries · Nurse Practitioner avg: 1K
Generic prescribing
71%
generic claims · 29% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
77.7/100
▼ 6 pts below national avg 83.5 · Above neutral

What the federal data shows

Melissa Dearing, APRN reported a CMS MIPS final score of 77.7/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 45 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

77.7/100
MIPS score · -6 vs avg
45
Part D claims, 2024
71%
generic prescribing
≥20th
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Melissa Dearing, APRN

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1235897422), first enumerated 12/04/2021.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 45 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 77.7/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Hospital affiliations

    4 CMS Care Compare hospital affiliations on record — practice footprint from the Doctors and Clinicians file.

    Source: CMS Care Compare

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1235897422 · Nurse Practitioner

NPI-10 · ENUM-RECENT · TAX-MEGA · MIPS-BELOW · RX-TRACE · BOOK-LIGHT · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1235897422
  • ENUM-RECENT 2021
  • TAX-MEGA 90K Nurse Practitioner
  • MIPS-BELOW 77.7/100
  • RX-TRACE 45
  • BOOK-LIGHT 647 in Oklahoma
  • PHOTO-FINISH Kimberly Boring · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Melissa Dearing, APRN's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

78 ≥ 20th percentile 20% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). This entry sits in this band. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Melissa Dearing, APRN sits

This provider among nurse practitioner peers

Across the 13,205 nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Melissa Dearing, APRN writes more Part D claims than 10% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 24% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.148.372.496.6Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Melissa Dearing, APRN, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 24
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Melissa Dearing, APRN. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Melissa Dearing, APRN?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 12/04/2021

NPI 1235897422

Primary specialty

Nurse Practitioner

High-volume

89,808 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

45 96% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,144

MIPS final score

77.7/100 5.8 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Oklahoma

How Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among Oklahoma providers

Oklahoma providers
Case Manager/Care Coordinator9.6%Mental Health Counselor7%Behavior Technician6.6%Peer Specialist5.6%Counselor4.9%Student in an Organized Heal…4.2%Nurse Practitioner0.7%
Largest specialties in Oklahoma (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Melissa Dearing, APRN's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Nurse Practitioner national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
77.7/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%77.7%
MIPS final score (Nurse Practitioner) - 77.7/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

3300 NW EXPRESSWAY
Oklahoma City, OK 73112

Provider Details

NPI 1235897422
Specialty Nurse Practitioner
Credentials APRN
Gender Female
NPI Issued 12/04/2021

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

77.6983
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
82.5298
Quality
43.1313
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Melissa Dearing, APRN bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

According to CMS billing records, Melissa Dearing, APRN is affiliated with 4 Medicare-billing facilities.

Emergency Physicians OF Mid-America PC
Oklahoma City, OK
Integris Ambulatory Care Corporation
Oklahoma City, OK
Saints Medical Group, LLC
Edmond, OK
South Central Emergency Services, PC
Stillwater, OK

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Above average

Melissa Dearing, APRN - brand share 29.0%
Nurse Practitioner average

29% brand-name claims vs 71% generic, on 45 2024 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

45
Total Claims
$1K
Total Drug Cost
34
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
45.667
Total Day Supply
414
Brand vs Generic
29% brand / 71% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$782
Generic Drug Cost
$249
Antibiotic Claims
16

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
72.7 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.15
Gender Split
68% female / 32% male

Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Melissa Dearing, APRN fits within the Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

89,808
Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
56
States with Nurse Practitioner
1,144
Avg Claims per Provider

Melissa Dearing, APRN's 45 claims are below the specialty average of 1,144.

Nationwide Nurse Practitioner peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Dearing, both outside Oklahoma so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (77.7 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2021)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Nurse Practitioner Providers in Oklahoma

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Oklahoma, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Dearing.

One of 647 Nurse Practitioner providers enrolled in Oklahoma, 5 are shown here.

Compare Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Melissa Dearing, APRN's specialty?
Melissa Dearing, APRN specializes in Nurse Practitioner and practices in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Credentials: APRN.
How much does Melissa Dearing, APRN prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Melissa Dearing, APRN wrote 45 Medicare Part D claims totaling $1K in drug costs for 34 beneficiaries.
What is Melissa Dearing, APRN's Medicare quality score?
Melissa Dearing, APRN has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 77.7/100 (Quality: 82.5, Cost: 43.1). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Melissa Dearing, APRN located?
Melissa Dearing, APRN is located at 3300 NW EXPRESSWAY, Oklahoma City, OK, 73112. Phone: (405) 949-3011.
What is Melissa Dearing, APRN's NPI number?
Melissa Dearing, APRN's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1235897422, issued on 12/04/2021.
Does Melissa Dearing, APRN prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Melissa Dearing, APRN's prescribing is 29% brand-name and 71% generic drugs by claim count, with $782 in brand drug costs.
How many Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US?
There are 89,808 Nurse Practitioner providers across 56 states in the US. The average Nurse Practitioner provider writes 1,144 Medicare Part D claims per year.
Does Melissa Dearing, APRN accept Medicare?
Melissa Dearing, APRN appears in CMS Medicare data with 45 Part D claims and 34 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Melissa Dearing, APRN's credentials?
Melissa Dearing, APRN's NPI is 1235897422 with credentials APRN. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.