2026 NPPES data Ophthalmology Physician NPI 1245440437
Verify on CMS →

Michael Feilmeier

Ophthalmology Physician in Omaha, Nebraska.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 22,082 in Ophthalmology Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
3K
Medicare Part D claims · 654 beneficiaries · Ophthalmology Physician avg: 1K
Generic prescribing
50%
generic claims · 50% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
67.4/100
▼ 16 pts below national avg 83.1 · Mid-tier
Industry payments
$73.38
5 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Michael Feilmeier reported a CMS MIPS final score of 67.4/100 - below the 83.1 national average - and filed 2,607 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

67.4/100
MIPS score · -16 vs avg
3K
Part D claims, 2023
50%
generic prescribing
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Michael Feilmeier's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure

67 7th percentile higher than 7% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). This entry sits in this band. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Above this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Michael Feilmeier sits

This provider among ophthalmology physician peers

Across the 9,866 ophthalmology physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Michael Feilmeier writes more Part D claims than 81% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 8% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.448.873.297.7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePart D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Michael Feilmeier-Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 81 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one ophthalmology physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Michael Feilmeier. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Michael Feilmeier practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting + 1 hospital affiliation - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Michael Feilmeier?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 05/23/2007

NPI 1245440437

Primary specialty

Ophthalmology Physician

Mid-sized

22,082 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

2,607 84% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,420

MIPS final score

67.4/100 15.7 pts vs avg

Mid-tier band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Nebraska

How Ophthalmology Physician compares to other specialties among Nebraska providers

Nebraska providers
Personal Care Attendant - 13.7%Personal Care Attendant13.7%Adult Companion - 7.6%Adult Companion7.6%Chore Provider - 6.1%Chore Provider6.1%Mental Health Counselor - 5.6%Mental Health Counselor5.6%Home Health Aide - 4.9%Home Health Aide4.9%Behavior Technician - 4.9%Behavior Technician4.9%Ophthalmology Physician - 0.1%Ophthalmology Physician0.1%
Largest specialties in Nebraska (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Michael Feilmeier's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Ophthalmology Physician national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
67.4/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Ophthalmology Physician) - 67.4/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%67.4%
MIPS final score (Ophthalmology Physician) - 67.4/100 vs national avg 83.1
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Michael Feilmeier appears in the CMS NPPES registry as an Ophthalmology Physician provider at 4353 DODGE ST, Omaha, NE, 68131, with a listed phone of (402) 552-2020. NPI 1245440437 was issued on 05/23/2007.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 2,607 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 654 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $210K in drug spend, split 50% brand-name and 50% generic by claim count. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 67.4/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 66.9, Cost 24.5), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Ophthalmology Physician is a mid-sized specialty nationwide, with 22,082 enrolled providers across 56 states and an average of 1,420 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline.

Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist, always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

4353 DODGE ST
Omaha, NE 68131

Provider Details

NPI 1245440437
Specialty Ophthalmology Physician
Gender Male
NPI Issued 05/23/2007

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

67.4229
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
66.9249
Quality
24.4849
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Michael Feilmeier bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Midwest Eye Care PC
Omaha, NE

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Michael Feilmeier. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$73

Largest payer

RxSight Inc

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Brand-heavy

Michael Feilmeier - brand share 50.0%
Ophthalmology Physician average

50% brand-name claims vs 50% generic, on 2,607 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

2,607
Total Claims
$210K
Total Drug Cost
654
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
4,012
Total Day Supply
107,173
Brand vs Generic
50% brand / 50% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$164K
Generic Drug Cost
$46K
Antibiotic Claims
22

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
74.4 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.02
Gender Split
62% female / 38% male
Age Distribution
<65: 29, 65-74: 306, 75-84: 252, 85+: 67

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Michael Feilmeier prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Prednisolone Acetate
841
Moxifloxacin
Moxifloxacin Hcl
538
Latanoprost
268
Fluorometholone
206
Timolol Maleate
170
Restasis
Cyclosporine
52
Brimonidine Tartrate
47
Difluprednate
47
Valacyclovir
Valacyclovir Hcl
43
Dexamethasone Sodium Phosphate
33

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Ophthalmology Physician Overview

How Michael Feilmeier fits within the Ophthalmology Physician landscape nationally.

22,082
Ophthalmology Physician Providers in US
56
States with Ophthalmology Physician
1,420
Avg Claims per Provider

Michael Feilmeier's 2,607 claims are above the specialty average of 1,420.

Nearby Ophthalmology Physician Providers in Nebraska

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Nebraska, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Feilmeier.

Compare Ophthalmology Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry, providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Nebraska medical board, federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Ophthalmology Physician peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only, they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Michael Feilmeier's specialty?
Michael Feilmeier specializes in Ophthalmology Physician and practices in Omaha, Nebraska.
How much does Michael Feilmeier prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Michael Feilmeier wrote 2,607 Medicare Part D claims totaling $210K in drug costs for 654 beneficiaries.
What is Michael Feilmeier's Medicare quality score?
Michael Feilmeier has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 67.4/100 (Quality: 66.9, Cost: 24.5). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Michael Feilmeier located?
Michael Feilmeier is located at 4353 DODGE ST, Omaha, NE, 68131. Phone: (402) 552-2020.
What is Michael Feilmeier's NPI number?
Michael Feilmeier's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1245440437, issued on 05/23/2007.
Does Michael Feilmeier prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Michael Feilmeier's prescribing is 50% brand-name and 50% generic drugs by claim count, with $164K in brand drug costs.
How many Ophthalmology Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 22,082 Ophthalmology Physician providers across 56 states in the US. The average Ophthalmology Physician provider writes 1,420 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Michael Feilmeier prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Michael Feilmeier's most frequently prescribed drugs include Prednisolone Acetate, Moxifloxacin, Latanoprost. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Michael Feilmeier accept Medicare?
Michael Feilmeier appears in CMS Medicare data with 2,607 Part D claims and 654 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Michael Feilmeier's credentials?
Michael Feilmeier's NPI is 1245440437. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.