PlainDoctor

2026 NPPES data Surgical Oncology Physician NPI 1811906993 M.D.
Verify on CMS →

Michael Grant, M.D.

Surgical Oncology Physician in Dallas, Texas.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 1,460 in Surgical Oncology Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
268
Medicare Part D claims · 113 beneficiaries · Surgical Oncology Physician avg: 99
MIPS score
30/100
▼ 54 pts below national avg 83.5 · Below average
Verify NPI on CMS Methodology
Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

What the federal data shows

Michael Grant, M.D. reported a CMS MIPS final score of 30/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 268 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

30/100
MIPS score · -53 vs avg
268
Part D claims, 2024
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)
≥3rd
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Michael Grant, M.D.

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1811906993), first enumerated 08/06/2006.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 268 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 30/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Board certification signal

    Heuristic suggests board-certified status based on ABMS-eligible specialty taxonomy plus active CMS participation signals — not a direct ABMS verification.

    Source: NUCC taxonomy + CMS participation heuristic

  • State context

    State board disciplinary context

    Texas statewide board action statistics are published annually — these figures describe aggregate state activity, not Michael Grant, M.D.'s individual license status. Verify directly with the state medical board.

    Source: TMB annual report 2023

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1811906993 · Surgical Oncology Physician

NPI-10 · ENUM-LEGACY · TAX-NARROW · MIPS-LOW · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1811906993
  • ENUM-LEGACY 2006
  • TAX-NARROW 1,460
  • MIPS-LOW 30/100
  • RX-LIGHT 268
  • BOOK-THIN 135 in Texas
  • PHOTO-FINISH Leslie Memsic · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Michael Grant, M.D.'s MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

30 ≥ 3rd percentile 3% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). This entry sits in this band. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Above this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Above this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Above this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Michael Grant, M.D. sits

This provider among surgical oncology physician peers

Across the 408 surgical oncology physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Michael Grant, M.D. writes more Part D claims than 92% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 2% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.949.974.899.8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Michael Grant, M.D., Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one surgical oncology physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Michael Grant, M.D.. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

✓
Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Michael Grant, M.D. practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Michael Grant, M.D.?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 08/06/2006

NPI 1811906993

Primary specialty

Surgical Oncology Physician

Niche

1,460 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

268 171% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 99

MIPS final score

30/100 53.5 pts vs avg

Below average band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Texas

How Surgical Oncology Physician compares to other specialties among Texas providers

Texas providers
Behavior Technician6%Student in an Organized Heal…5.3%Family Nurse Practitioner4.5%Professional Counselor4.4%Pharmacist4.3%Speech-Language Pathologist3.9%Surgical Oncology Physician0%
Largest specialties in Texas (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Michael Grant, M.D.'s 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Surgical Oncology Physician national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
30/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%30%
MIPS final score (Surgical Oncology Physician) - 30/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

3409 WORTH ST
Dallas, TX 75246
(214) 826-7300

Provider Details

NPI 1811906993
Specialty Surgical Oncology Physician
Credentials M.D.
Gender Male
NPI Issued 08/06/2006

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

30
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
0
Quality
100
Cost

Reporting: Individual

License & disciplinary context - Texas TMB 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~77K Texas medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Michael Grant, M.D.. To verify Michael Grant, M.D.'s current license status, search the TMB public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

344
Total board actions, Texas 2023
Across 334 cases
4.47
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Texas statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
94 cases

TMB publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Texas disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

268
Total Claims
$5K
Total Drug Cost
113
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
541.667
Total Day Supply
14,248
Brand Drug Cost
$0
Generic Drug Cost
$5K
Opioid Claims
62 (23.1% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
12

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
75.2 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.04
Gender Split
100% female / 0% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Michael Grant, M.D. prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Anastrozole
 132
Tramadol Hcl
 56
Letrozole
 23
Raloxifene Hcl
 23

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

More Surgical Oncology Physician in TX → All providers in Texas → Compare specialties →

Surgical Oncology Physician Overview

How Michael Grant, M.D. fits within the Surgical Oncology Physician landscape nationally.

1,460
Surgical Oncology Physician Providers in US
51
States with Surgical Oncology Physician
99
Avg Claims per Provider

Michael Grant, M.D.'s 268 claims are above the specialty average of 99.

Nationwide Surgical Oncology Physician peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Grant, both outside Texas so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (30 here).

Leslie Memsic 30 CA Elizabeth Brady 30.4 MA Joshua Ellenhorn 25.9 CA Russell Langan 25.8 NJ

Same NPPES enumeration year (2006)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Scott Kelley Lakeland, FL Ryan Takamori Honolulu, HI Muhammad Hena Albany, NY Kevin Roggin Charleston, SC

Nearby Surgical Oncology Physician Providers in Texas

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Texas, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Grant.

One of 135 Surgical Oncology Physician providers enrolled in Texas, 5 are shown here.

Dr. Hassan Ahmed
MD
Plano, TX
Daniel Albo
Harlingen, TX
Dr. John Alexander
M.D., F.A.C.S.
Dallas, TX
Dr. Fadwa Ali
M.D.
Dallas, TX
Dr. Thomas Aloia
M.D.
Houston, TX

Compare Surgical Oncology Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Michael Grant, M.D.'s specialty? ▼
Michael Grant, M.D. specializes in Surgical Oncology Physician and practices in Dallas, Texas. Credentials: M.D..
How much does Michael Grant, M.D. prescribe under Medicare Part D? ▼
In 2024, Michael Grant, M.D. wrote 268 Medicare Part D claims totaling $5K in drug costs for 113 beneficiaries.
What is Michael Grant, M.D.'s Medicare quality score? ▼
Michael Grant, M.D. has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 30/100 (Quality: 0, Cost: 100). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Michael Grant, M.D. located? ▼
Michael Grant, M.D. is located at 3409 WORTH ST, Dallas, TX, 75246. Phone: (214) 826-7300.
What is Michael Grant, M.D.'s NPI number? ▼
Michael Grant, M.D.'s National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1811906993, issued on 08/06/2006.
Does Michael Grant, M.D. prescribe opioids? ▼
Yes, Michael Grant, M.D. had 62 opioid claims in 2024 with an opioid prescribing rate of 23.1%.
How many Surgical Oncology Physician providers are there in the US? ▼
There are 1,460 Surgical Oncology Physician providers across 51 states in the US. The average Surgical Oncology Physician provider writes 99 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Michael Grant, M.D. prescribe most often? ▼
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Michael Grant, M.D.'s most frequently prescribed drugs include Anastrozole, Tramadol Hcl, Letrozole. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Michael Grant, M.D. accept Medicare? ▼
Michael Grant, M.D. appears in CMS Medicare data with 268 Part D claims and 113 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Michael Grant, M.D.'s credentials? ▼
Michael Grant, M.D.'s NPI is 1811906993 with credentials M.D.. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.