2026 NPPES data Medical Oncology Physician NPI 1396726113 MD PHD
Verify on CMS →

Michael Hurwitz, MD PHD

Medical Oncology Physician in New Haven, Connecticut.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 4,028 in Medical Oncology Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
1K
Medicare Part D claims · 163 beneficiaries · Medical Oncology Physician avg: 732
Generic prescribing
70%
generic claims · 30% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
73.6/100
▼ 10 pts below national avg 83.5 · Mid-tier

What the federal data shows

Michael Hurwitz, MD PHD reported a CMS MIPS final score of 73.6/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 1,441 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

73.6/100
MIPS score · -10 vs avg
1K
Part D claims, 2024
70%
generic prescribing
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Michael Hurwitz, MD PHD

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1396726113), first enumerated 11/09/2005.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 1,441 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 73.6/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Board certification signal

    Heuristic suggests board-certified status based on ABMS-eligible specialty taxonomy plus active CMS participation signals — not a direct ABMS verification.

    Source: NUCC taxonomy + CMS participation heuristic

  • Reported

    Hospital affiliations

    1 CMS Care Compare hospital affiliation on record — practice footprint from the Doctors and Clinicians file.

    Source: CMS Care Compare

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1396726113 · Medical Oncology Physician

NPI-10 · ENUM-LEGACY · TAX-NARROW · MIPS-BELOW · RX-MID · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1396726113
  • ENUM-LEGACY 2005
  • TAX-NARROW 4,028
  • MIPS-BELOW 73.6/100
  • RX-MID 1,441
  • BOOK-THIN 63 in Connecticut
  • PHOTO-FINISH Sarah Conlon, MD · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Michael Hurwitz, MD PHD's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

74 ≥ 11th percentile 11% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). This entry sits in this band. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Michael Hurwitz, MD PHD sits

This provider among medical oncology physician peers

Across the 1,398 medical oncology physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Michael Hurwitz, MD PHD writes more Part D claims than 87% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 3% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Michael Hurwitz, MD PHD, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one medical oncology physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Michael Hurwitz, MD PHD. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Michael Hurwitz, MD PHD practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting + 1 hospital affiliation - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Michael Hurwitz, MD PHD?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 11/09/2005

NPI 1396726113

Primary specialty

Medical Oncology Physician

Niche

4,028 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

1,441 97% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 732

MIPS final score

73.6/100 9.9 pts vs avg

Mid-tier band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Connecticut

How Medical Oncology Physician compares to other specialties among Connecticut providers

Connecticut providers
Clinical Social Worker8.4%Student in an Organized Heal…7.9%Physical Therapist4.2%Pharmacist3.9%Internal Medicine Physician3.4%Mental Health Counselor3.2%Medical Oncology Physician0.1%
Largest specialties in Connecticut (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Michael Hurwitz, MD PHD's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Medical Oncology Physician national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
73.6/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%73.6%
MIPS final score (Medical Oncology Physician) - 73.6/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

333 CEDAR ST
New Haven, CT 06510

Provider Details

NPI 1396726113
Specialty Medical Oncology Physician
Credentials MD PHD
Gender Male
NPI Issued 11/09/2005

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

73.5637
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
75.8435
Quality
51.4318
Cost
74
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Michael Hurwitz, MD PHD bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Yale University
New Haven, CT

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Above average

Michael Hurwitz, MD PHD - brand share 30.0%
Medical Oncology Physician average

30% brand-name claims vs 70% generic, on 1,441 2024 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

1,441
Total Claims
$6.4M
Total Drug Cost
163
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
1,682.733
Total Day Supply
48,358
Brand vs Generic
30% brand / 70% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$5.6M
Generic Drug Cost
$791K
Opioid Claims
45 (3.1% rate)

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
75.2 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
2.98
Gender Split
8% female / 92% male
Age Distribution
<65: 11, 65-74: 71, 75-84: 54, 85+: 27

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Michael Hurwitz, MD PHD prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Prednisone
284
Abiraterone Acetate
260
Nubeqa
Darolutamide
150
Xtandi
Enzalutamide
79
Orgovyx
Relugolix
62
Venlafaxine Hcl Er
Venlafaxine Hcl
49
Welireg
Belzutifan
46
Ondansetron Odt
Ondansetron
33
Bicalutamide
30
Levothyroxine Sodium
30

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Medical Oncology Physician Overview

How Michael Hurwitz, MD PHD fits within the Medical Oncology Physician landscape nationally.

4,028
Medical Oncology Physician Providers in US
53
States with Medical Oncology Physician
732
Avg Claims per Provider

Michael Hurwitz, MD PHD's 1,441 claims are above the specialty average of 732.

Nationwide Medical Oncology Physician peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Hurwitz, both outside Connecticut so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (73.6 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2005)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Medical Oncology Physician Providers in Connecticut

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Connecticut, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Hurwitz.

One of 63 Medical Oncology Physician providers enrolled in Connecticut, 5 are shown here.

Compare Medical Oncology Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Michael Hurwitz, MD PHD's specialty?
Michael Hurwitz, MD PHD specializes in Medical Oncology Physician and practices in New Haven, Connecticut. Credentials: MD PHD.
How much does Michael Hurwitz, MD PHD prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Michael Hurwitz, MD PHD wrote 1,441 Medicare Part D claims totaling $6.4M in drug costs for 163 beneficiaries.
What is Michael Hurwitz, MD PHD's Medicare quality score?
Michael Hurwitz, MD PHD has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 73.6/100 (Quality: 75.8, Cost: 51.4). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Michael Hurwitz, MD PHD located?
Michael Hurwitz, MD PHD is located at 333 CEDAR ST, New Haven, CT, 06510. Phone: (203) 200-4822.
What is Michael Hurwitz, MD PHD's NPI number?
Michael Hurwitz, MD PHD's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1396726113, issued on 11/09/2005.
Does Michael Hurwitz, MD PHD prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Michael Hurwitz, MD PHD's prescribing is 30% brand-name and 70% generic drugs by claim count, with $5.6M in brand drug costs.
Does Michael Hurwitz, MD PHD prescribe opioids?
Yes, Michael Hurwitz, MD PHD had 45 opioid claims in 2024 with an opioid prescribing rate of 3.1%.
How many Medical Oncology Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 4,028 Medical Oncology Physician providers across 53 states in the US. The average Medical Oncology Physician provider writes 732 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Michael Hurwitz, MD PHD prescribe most often?
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Michael Hurwitz, MD PHD's most frequently prescribed drugs include Prednisone, Abiraterone Acetate, Nubeqa. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Michael Hurwitz, MD PHD accept Medicare?
Michael Hurwitz, MD PHD appears in CMS Medicare data with 1,441 Part D claims and 163 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Michael Hurwitz, MD PHD's credentials?
Michael Hurwitz, MD PHD's NPI is 1396726113 with credentials MD PHD. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.