2026 NPPES data Adult Health Nurse Practitioner NPI 1518283779 CNP
Verify on CMS →

Michelle Vandemark, CNP

Adult Health Nurse Practitioner in Sioux Falls, South Dakota.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 29,519 in Adult Health Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
17
Medicare Part D claims · 13 beneficiaries · Adult Health Nurse Practitioner avg: 1K
MIPS score
78/100
▼ 6 pts below national avg 83.5 · Above neutral

What the federal data shows

Michelle Vandemark, CNP reported a CMS MIPS final score of 78/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 17 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

78/100
MIPS score · -6 vs avg
17
Part D claims, 2023
≥20th
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Michelle Vandemark, CNP's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

78 ≥ 20th percentile 20% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). This entry sits in this band. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Michelle Vandemark, CNP sits

This provider among adult health nurse practitioner peers

Across the 4,201 adult health nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Michelle Vandemark, CNP writes more Part D claims than 2% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 21% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.448.873.297.7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Michelle Vandemark, CNP, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 21
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one adult health nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Michelle Vandemark, CNP. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Michelle Vandemark, CNP?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 04/13/2010

NPI 1518283779

Primary specialty

Adult Health Nurse Practitioner

Mid-sized

29,519 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

17 99% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,201

MIPS final score

78/100 5.5 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in South Dakota

How Adult Health Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among South Dakota providers

South Dakota providers
Physical Therapist5.6%Pharmacist5.5%Registered Nurse4.8%Family Nurse Practitioner4.7%Mental Health Counselor4%Physician Assistant3.7%Adult Health Nurse Practitio…0.1%
Largest specialties in South Dakota (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Michelle Vandemark, CNP's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Adult Health Nurse Practitioner national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
78/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%78%
MIPS final score (Adult Health Nurse Practitioner) - 78/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Michelle Vandemark, CNP appears in the CMS NPPES registry as an Adult Health Nurse Practitioner provider holding CNP credentials at 1205 S GRANGE AVE STE 201, Sioux Falls, SD, 57105, with a listed phone of (605) 328-8188. NPI 1518283779 was issued on 04/13/2010.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 17 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 13 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $1K in drug spend. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 78/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 80.1, Cost 47.4), compared with the 83.5 average among clinicians with a measured score.

Adult Health Nurse Practitioner is a mid-sized specialty nationwide, with 29,519 enrolled providers across 55 states and an average of 1,201 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline.

Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist, always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

1205 S GRANGE AVE STE 201
Sioux Falls, SD 57105

Provider Details

NPI 1518283779
Specialty Adult Health Nurse Practitioner
Credentials CNP
Gender Female
NPI Issued 04/13/2010

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

77.9984
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
80.1358
Quality
47.3589
Cost
99
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

17
Total Claims
$1K
Total Drug Cost
13
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
37
Total Day Supply
1,023
Generic Drug Cost
$578

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
77.2 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.58
Age Distribution
<65: 0, 65-74: N/A, 75-84: N/A, 85+: N/A

Adult Health Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Michelle Vandemark, CNP fits within the Adult Health Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

29,519
Adult Health Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
55
States with Adult Health Nurse Practitioner
1,201
Avg Claims per Provider

Michelle Vandemark, CNP's 17 claims are below the specialty average of 1,201.

Nationwide Adult Health Nurse Practitioner peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Vandemark, both outside South Dakota so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (78 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2010)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Adult Health Nurse Practitioner Providers in South Dakota

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in South Dakota, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Vandemark.

One of 21 Adult Health Nurse Practitioner providers enrolled in South Dakota, 5 are shown here.

Compare Adult Health Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry, providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the South Dakota medical board, federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Adult Health Nurse Practitioner peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only, they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Michelle Vandemark, CNP's specialty?
Michelle Vandemark, CNP specializes in Adult Health Nurse Practitioner and practices in Sioux Falls, South Dakota. Credentials: CNP.
How much does Michelle Vandemark, CNP prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Michelle Vandemark, CNP wrote 17 Medicare Part D claims totaling $1K in drug costs for 13 beneficiaries.
What is Michelle Vandemark, CNP's Medicare quality score?
Michelle Vandemark, CNP has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 78/100 (Quality: 80.1, Cost: 47.4). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Michelle Vandemark, CNP located?
Michelle Vandemark, CNP is located at 1205 S GRANGE AVE STE 201, Sioux Falls, SD, 57105. Phone: (605) 328-8188.
What is Michelle Vandemark, CNP's NPI number?
Michelle Vandemark, CNP's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1518283779, issued on 04/13/2010.
How many Adult Health Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US?
There are 29,519 Adult Health Nurse Practitioner providers across 55 states in the US. The average Adult Health Nurse Practitioner provider writes 1,201 Medicare Part D claims per year.
Does Michelle Vandemark, CNP accept Medicare?
Michelle Vandemark, CNP appears in CMS Medicare data with 17 Part D claims and 13 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Michelle Vandemark, CNP's credentials?
Michelle Vandemark, CNP's NPI is 1518283779 with credentials CNP. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.