2026 NPPES data Licensed Practical Nurse NPI 1245399419 N.P.
Verify on CMS →

Nada Farhat, N.P.

Licensed Practical Nurse in New York, New York.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 73,328 in Licensed Practical Nurse, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
230
Medicare Part D claims · 51 beneficiaries · Licensed Practical Nurse avg: 961
Generic prescribing
86%
generic claims · 14% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
100/100
▲ 17 pts above national avg 83.5 · Exceptional

What the federal data shows

Nada Farhat, N.P. reported a CMS MIPS final score of 100/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 230 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

100/100
MIPS score · +17 vs avg
230
Part D claims, 2024
86%
generic prescribing
≥92nd
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Nada Farhat, N.P.

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1245399419), first enumerated 12/06/2006.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 230 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 100/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Hospital affiliations

    1 CMS Care Compare hospital affiliation on record — practice footprint from the Doctors and Clinicians file.

    Source: CMS Care Compare

  • State context

    State board disciplinary context

    New York statewide board action statistics are published annually — these figures describe aggregate state activity, not Nada Farhat, N.P.'s individual license status. Verify directly with the state medical board.

    Source: NYSBPMC annual report 2023

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1245399419 · Licensed Practical Nurse

NPI-10 · ENUM-LEGACY · TAX-MEGA · MIPS-ELITE · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-MID · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1245399419
  • ENUM-LEGACY 2006
  • TAX-MEGA 73K Licensed Practical
  • MIPS-ELITE 100/100
  • RX-LIGHT 230
  • BOOK-MID 23,344 in New York
  • PHOTO-FINISH Elizabeth Hutchens · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Nada Farhat, N.P.'s MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

100 ≥ 92nd percentile 92% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Below this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Nada Farhat, N.P. sits

This provider among licensed practical nurse peers

Across the 30 licensed practical nurse providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Nada Farhat, N.P. writes more Part D claims than 57% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 87% - placing this provider in the high-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100023.647.370.994.5Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 41 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 76 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 14Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 79Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 24 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 21 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 34Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 69 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 76Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 41Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 31 · MIPS quality, percentile: 24Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 31Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 41 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 79 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 66 · MIPS quality, percentile: 66Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 86Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 34 · MIPS quality, percentile: 21Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 86 · MIPS quality, percentile: 69Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 59Nada Farhat, N.P., Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one licensed practical nurse peer from a representative sample of 29; the gold marker is Nada Farhat, N.P.. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Nada Farhat, N.P.?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 12/06/2006

NPI 1245399419

Primary specialty

Licensed Practical Nurse

High-volume

73,328 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

230 76% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 961

MIPS final score

100/100 16.5 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in New York

How Licensed Practical Nurse compares to other specialties among New York providers

New York providers
Student in an Organized Heal…8%Registered Nurse5.2%Clinical Social Worker4.9%Social Worker4.5%Speech-Language Pathologist4.5%Licensed Practical Nurse4.3%
Largest specialties in New York (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Nada Farhat, N.P.'s 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Licensed Practical Nurse national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
100/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%99%
MIPS final score (Licensed Practical Nurse) - 100/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

161 FORT WASHINGTON AVE
New York, NY 10032

Provider Details

NPI 1245399419
Specialty Licensed Practical Nurse
Credentials N.P.
Gender Female
NPI Issued 12/06/2006

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

100
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
86.8066
Quality
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Alternative Payment Model

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Nada Farhat, N.P. bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Trustees OF Columbia University IN The City OF New York
New York, NY

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

License & disciplinary context - New York NYSBPMC 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~100K New York medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Nada Farhat, N.P.. To verify Nada Farhat, N.P.'s current license status, search the NYSBPMC public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

312
Total board actions, New York 2023
Across 302 cases
3.12
Actions per 1,000 licensees
New York statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
89 cases

NYSBPMC publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the New York disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Typical

Nada Farhat, N.P. - brand share 14.0%
Licensed Practical Nurse average

14% brand-name claims vs 86% generic, on 230 2024 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

230
Total Claims
$43K
Total Drug Cost
51
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
595.867
Total Day Supply
17,638
Brand vs Generic
14% brand / 86% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$41K
Generic Drug Cost
$2K

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
62.9 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.02
Gender Split
43% female / 57% male
Age Distribution
<65: 20, 65-74: 19, 75-84: N/A, 85+: N/A

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Nada Farhat, N.P. prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Metoprolol Succinate
38
Amlodipine Besylate
26
Lisinopril
26
Atorvastatin Calcium
19
Losartan Potassium
14
Warfarin Sodium
14
Eliquis
Apixaban
12
Hydrochlorothiazide
12

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Licensed Practical Nurse Overview

How Nada Farhat, N.P. fits within the Licensed Practical Nurse landscape nationally.

73,328
Licensed Practical Nurse Providers in US
55
States with Licensed Practical Nurse
961
Avg Claims per Provider

Nada Farhat, N.P.'s 230 claims are below the specialty average of 961.

Nationwide Licensed Practical Nurse peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Farhat, both outside New York so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (100 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2006)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Licensed Practical Nurse Providers in New York

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in New York, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Farhat.

One of 23,344 Licensed Practical Nurse providers enrolled in New York, 5 are shown here.

Compare Licensed Practical Nurse nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Nada Farhat, N.P.'s specialty?
Nada Farhat, N.P. specializes in Licensed Practical Nurse and practices in New York, New York. Credentials: N.P..
How much does Nada Farhat, N.P. prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Nada Farhat, N.P. wrote 230 Medicare Part D claims totaling $43K in drug costs for 51 beneficiaries.
What is Nada Farhat, N.P.'s Medicare quality score?
Nada Farhat, N.P. has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 100/100 (Quality: 86.8). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Nada Farhat, N.P. located?
Nada Farhat, N.P. is located at 161 FORT WASHINGTON AVE, New York, NY, 10032. Phone: (212) 305-6936.
What is Nada Farhat, N.P.'s NPI number?
Nada Farhat, N.P.'s National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1245399419, issued on 12/06/2006.
Does Nada Farhat, N.P. prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Nada Farhat, N.P.'s prescribing is 14% brand-name and 86% generic drugs by claim count, with $41K in brand drug costs.
How many Licensed Practical Nurse providers are there in the US?
There are 73,328 Licensed Practical Nurse providers across 55 states in the US. The average Licensed Practical Nurse provider writes 961 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Nada Farhat, N.P. prescribe most often?
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Nada Farhat, N.P.'s most frequently prescribed drugs include Metoprolol Succinate, Amlodipine Besylate, Lisinopril. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Nada Farhat, N.P. accept Medicare?
Nada Farhat, N.P. appears in CMS Medicare data with 230 Part D claims and 51 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Nada Farhat, N.P.'s credentials?
Nada Farhat, N.P.'s NPI is 1245399419 with credentials N.P.. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.