2026 NPPES data Adult Health Nurse Practitioner NPI 1356098628 MSN, APRN,A-GNP-C
Verify on CMS →

Natalia Muravieva, MSN, APRN,A-GNP-C

Adult Health Nurse Practitioner in Cumming, Georgia.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 29,811 in Adult Health Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
823
Medicare Part D claims · 173 beneficiaries · Adult Health Nurse Practitioner avg: 1K
Generic prescribing
33%
generic claims · 57% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
92.3/100
▲ 9 pts above national avg 83.5 · Exceptional

What the federal data shows

Natalia Muravieva, MSN, APRN,A-GNP-C reported a CMS MIPS final score of 92.3/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 823 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

92.3/100
MIPS score · +9 vs avg
823
Part D claims, 2024
33%
generic prescribing
≥66th
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Natalia Muravieva, MSN, APRN,A-GNP-C

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1356098628), first enumerated 03/07/2022.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 823 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 92.3/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1356098628 · Adult Health Nurse Practitioner

NPI-10 · ENUM-RECENT · TAX-MID · MIPS-ABOVE · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-LIGHT · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1356098628
  • ENUM-RECENT 2022
  • TAX-MID 30K Adult Health
  • MIPS-ABOVE 92.3/100
  • RX-LIGHT 823
  • BOOK-LIGHT 742 in Georgia
  • PHOTO-FINISH Laura Bamford · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Natalia Muravieva, MSN, APRN,A-GNP-C's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

92 ≥ 66th percentile 66% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Below this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Natalia Muravieva, MSN, APRN,A-GNP-C sits

This provider among adult health nurse practitioner peers

Across the 4,201 adult health nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Natalia Muravieva, MSN, APRN,A-GNP-C writes more Part D claims than 66% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 69% - placing this provider in the high-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.448.873.297.7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Natalia Muravieva, MSN, APRN,A-GNP-C, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 66 · MIPS quality, percentile: 69
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one adult health nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Natalia Muravieva, MSN, APRN,A-GNP-C. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Natalia Muravieva, MSN, APRN,A-GNP-C?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 03/07/2022

NPI 1356098628

Primary specialty

Adult Health Nurse Practitioner

Mid-sized

29,811 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

823 36% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,291

MIPS final score

92.3/100 8.8 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Georgia

How Adult Health Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among Georgia providers

Georgia providers
Behavior Technician7.5%Student in an Organized Heal…5%Pharmacist5%Family Nurse Practitioner4.8%Physical Therapist3.9%Professional Counselor3.6%Adult Health Nurse Practitio…0.4%
Largest specialties in Georgia (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Natalia Muravieva, MSN, APRN,A-GNP-C's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Adult Health Nurse Practitioner national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
92.3/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%92.3%
MIPS final score (Adult Health Nurse Practitioner) - 92.3/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

2635 SENTINEL CHASE WAY
Cumming, GA 30041

Provider Details

NPI 1356098628
Specialty Adult Health Nurse Practitioner
Credentials MSN, APRN,A-GNP-C
Gender Female
NPI Issued 03/07/2022

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

92.2614
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
73.8353
Quality
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Alternative Payment Model

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Brand-heavy

Natalia Muravieva, MSN, APRN,A-GNP-C - brand share 57.0%
Adult Health Nurse Practitioner average

57% brand-name claims vs 33% generic, on 823 2024 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

823
Total Claims
$412K
Total Drug Cost
173
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
1,791.433
Total Day Supply
53,179
Brand vs Generic
57% brand / 33% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$398K
Generic Drug Cost
$4K

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
70.2 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
2.04
Gender Split
70% female / 30% male
Age Distribution
<65: 36, 65-74: 76, 75-84: 48, 85+: 13

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Natalia Muravieva, MSN, APRN,A-GNP-C prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Ozempic
Semaglutide
89
Levothyroxine Sodium
72
Trulicity
Dulaglutide
60
Metformin Hcl Er
Metformin Hcl
51
Lantus Solostar
Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog
47
Metformin Hcl
39
Nano 2nd Gen Pen Needle
Pen Needle, Diabetic
32
Jardiance
Empagliflozin
23
Basaglar Kwikpen U-100
Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog
22
Insulin Lispro Kwikpen U-100
Insulin Lispro
20

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Adult Health Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Natalia Muravieva, MSN, APRN,A-GNP-C fits within the Adult Health Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

29,811
Adult Health Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
55
States with Adult Health Nurse Practitioner
1,291
Avg Claims per Provider

Natalia Muravieva, MSN, APRN,A-GNP-C's 823 claims are below the specialty average of 1,291.

Nationwide Adult Health Nurse Practitioner peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Muravieva, both outside Georgia so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (92.3 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2022)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Adult Health Nurse Practitioner Providers in Georgia

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Georgia, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Muravieva.

One of 742 Adult Health Nurse Practitioner providers enrolled in Georgia, 5 are shown here.

Compare Adult Health Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Natalia Muravieva, MSN, APRN,A-GNP-C's specialty?
Natalia Muravieva, MSN, APRN,A-GNP-C specializes in Adult Health Nurse Practitioner and practices in Cumming, Georgia. Credentials: MSN, APRN,A-GNP-C.
How much does Natalia Muravieva, MSN, APRN,A-GNP-C prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Natalia Muravieva, MSN, APRN,A-GNP-C wrote 823 Medicare Part D claims totaling $412K in drug costs for 173 beneficiaries.
What is Natalia Muravieva, MSN, APRN,A-GNP-C's Medicare quality score?
Natalia Muravieva, MSN, APRN,A-GNP-C has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 92.3/100 (Quality: 73.8). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Natalia Muravieva, MSN, APRN,A-GNP-C located?
Natalia Muravieva, MSN, APRN,A-GNP-C is located at 2635 SENTINEL CHASE WAY, Cumming, GA, 30041. Phone: (678) 832-8506.
What is Natalia Muravieva, MSN, APRN,A-GNP-C's NPI number?
Natalia Muravieva, MSN, APRN,A-GNP-C's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1356098628, issued on 03/07/2022.
Does Natalia Muravieva, MSN, APRN,A-GNP-C prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Natalia Muravieva, MSN, APRN,A-GNP-C's prescribing is 57% brand-name and 33% generic drugs by claim count, with $398K in brand drug costs.
How many Adult Health Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US?
There are 29,811 Adult Health Nurse Practitioner providers across 55 states in the US. The average Adult Health Nurse Practitioner provider writes 1,291 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Natalia Muravieva, MSN, APRN,A-GNP-C prescribe most often?
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Natalia Muravieva, MSN, APRN,A-GNP-C's most frequently prescribed drugs include Ozempic, Levothyroxine Sodium, Trulicity. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Natalia Muravieva, MSN, APRN,A-GNP-C accept Medicare?
Natalia Muravieva, MSN, APRN,A-GNP-C appears in CMS Medicare data with 823 Part D claims and 173 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Natalia Muravieva, MSN, APRN,A-GNP-C's credentials?
Natalia Muravieva, MSN, APRN,A-GNP-C's NPI is 1356098628 with credentials MSN, APRN,A-GNP-C. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.