2026 NPPES data Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program NPI 1609262948 M.D.
Verify on CMS →

Natalie Sadik, M.D.

Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program in Detroit, Michigan. This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers — including 331,761 in Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration — see our methodology.

Federal data — no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is — no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
642
Medicare Part D claims · 34 beneficiaries · Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program avg: 459
MIPS score
83.4/100
▲ 0 pts above national avg 83.1 · Above neutral
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Natalie Sadik, M.D. reported a CMS MIPS final score of 83.4/100 — above the 83.1 national average — and filed 642 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

83.4/100
MIPS score · +0 vs avg
642
Part D claims, 2023

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) — no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Natalie Sadik, M.D.'s MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023 — the federal quality measure

83 42nd percentile higher than 42% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). This entry sits in this band. 90–100: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Natalie Sadik, M.D. sits

This provider among student in an organized health care education/training program peers

Across the 12,645 student in an organized health care education/training program providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Natalie Sadik, M.D. writes more Part D claims than 72% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 38% — placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume — percentile in specialtyMIPS quality — percentilePart D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality — percentile: 70Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality — percentile: 73Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality — percentile: 98Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality — percentile: 80Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality — percentile: 68Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality — percentile: 7Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality — percentile: 28Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality — percentile: 55Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality — percentile: 53Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality — percentile: 35Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality — percentile: 52Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality — percentile: 70Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality — percentile: 2Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality — percentile: 8Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality — percentile: 65Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality — percentile: 95Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality — percentile: 20Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality — percentile: 22Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality — percentile: 50Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality — percentile: 45Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality — percentile: 82Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality — percentile: 67Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality — percentile: 83Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality — percentile: 12Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality — percentile: 75Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality — percentile: 60Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality — percentile: 57Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality — percentile: 10Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality — percentile: 33Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality — percentile: 97Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality — percentile: 47Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality — percentile: 60Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality — percentile: 25Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality — percentile: 98Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality — percentile: 3Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality — percentile: 37Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality — percentile: 77Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality — percentile: 93Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality — percentile: 0Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality — percentile: 57Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality — percentile: 42Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality — percentile: 27Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality — percentile: 78Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality — percentile: 22Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality — percentile: 48Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality — percentile: 18Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality — percentile: 17Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality — percentile: 38Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality — percentile: 90Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality — percentile: 15Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality — percentile: 5Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality — percentile: 63Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality — percentile: 42Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality — percentile: 30Natalie Sadik, M.D. — Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality — percentile: 38
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one student in an organized health care education/training program peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Natalie Sadik, M.D.. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Natalie Sadik, M.D.?

Near national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 04/14/2015

NPI 1609262948

Primary specialty

Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program

High-volume

331,761 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

642 40% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 459

MIPS final score

83.4/100 0.3 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Michigan

How Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program compares to other specialties among Michigan providers

Michigan providers

Largest specialties in Michigan (% of in-state providers)

Behavior Technician — 21.4%Behavior Technician21.4%Clinical Social Worker — 5.8%Clinical Social Worker5.8%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program — 3.6%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program3.6%Physical Therapist — 3.4%Physical Therapist3.4%Social Worker — 3.4%Social Worker3.4%Pharmacist — 3%Pharmacist3%
Largest specialties in Michigan (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance — MIPS

Natalie Sadik, M.D.'s 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program national average

Near national average
MIPS Final Score
83.4/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program) — 83.4/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%83.4%
MIPS final score (Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program) — 83.4/100 vs national avg 83.1

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Natalie Sadik, M.D. appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program provider holding M.D. credentials at 3901 CHRYSLER SERVICE DRIVE, Detroit, MI, 48201, with a listed phone of (313) 993-3416. NPI 1609262948 was issued on 04/14/2015. Because NPPES data is self-reported by the provider and refreshed monthly, the address, phone, and specialty reflect what Sadik most recently submitted to CMS rather than a vetted directory listing, which is why patients should always confirm the practice is still at this location before scheduling.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 642 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 34 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $122K in drug spend. These figures capture only Medicare Part D — commercial insurance, Medicaid, and cash-pay prescriptions are not included, and any drug-beneficiary cell under 11 is suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 83.4/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 68.1, Cost 60.6), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program is a high-volume specialty nationwide, with 331,761 enrolled providers across 55 states and an average of 459 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline. Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist — always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

3901 CHRYSLER SERVICE DRIVE
Detroit, MI 48201

Provider Details

NPI 1609262948
Specialty Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program
Credentials M.D.
Gender Female
NPI Issued 04/14/2015

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

83.357
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
68.0602
Quality
60.6155
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

License & disciplinary context — Michigan MI-BOM 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only — NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~41K Michigan medical licensees in 2023 — they are NOT specific to Natalie Sadik, M.D.. To verify Natalie Sadik, M.D.'s current license status, search the MI-BOM public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

123
Total board actions, Michigan 2023
Across 120 cases
3.00
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Michigan statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
44 cases

MI-BOM publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Michigan disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

642
Total Claims
$122K
Total Drug Cost
34
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
660
Total Day Supply
19,558
Generic Drug Cost
$21K

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
50.0 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.39
Gender Split
44% female / 56% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Natalie Sadik, M.D. prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Clonazepam
55
Trazodone Hcl
47
Prazosin Hcl
32
Aripiprazole
31
Lamotrigine
30
Venlafaxine Hcl Er
Venlafaxine Hcl
29
Risperidone
27
Sertraline Hcl
25
Quetiapine Fumarate
24
Olanzapine
21

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program Overview

How Natalie Sadik, M.D. fits within the Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program landscape nationally.

331,761
Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program Providers in US
55
States with Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program
459
Avg Claims per Provider

Natalie Sadik, M.D.'s 642 claims are above the specialty average of 459.

Nearby Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program Providers in Michigan

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Michigan, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Sadik.

Compare Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry — providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Michigan medical board — federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only — they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Natalie Sadik, M.D.'s specialty?
Natalie Sadik, M.D. specializes in Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program and practices in Detroit, Michigan. Credentials: M.D..
How much does Natalie Sadik, M.D. prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Natalie Sadik, M.D. wrote 642 Medicare Part D claims totaling $122K in drug costs for 34 beneficiaries.
What is Natalie Sadik, M.D.'s Medicare quality score?
Natalie Sadik, M.D. has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 83.4/100 (Quality: 68.1, Cost: 60.6). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Natalie Sadik, M.D. located?
Natalie Sadik, M.D. is located at 3901 CHRYSLER SERVICE DRIVE, Detroit, MI, 48201. Phone: (313) 993-3416.
What is Natalie Sadik, M.D.'s NPI number?
Natalie Sadik, M.D.'s National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1609262948, issued on 04/14/2015.
How many Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program providers are there in the US?
There are 331,761 Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program providers across 55 states in the US. The average Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program provider writes 459 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Natalie Sadik, M.D. prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Natalie Sadik, M.D.'s most frequently prescribed drugs include Clonazepam, Trazodone Hcl, Prazosin Hcl. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Natalie Sadik, M.D. accept Medicare?
Natalie Sadik, M.D. appears in CMS Medicare data with 642 Part D claims and 34 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Natalie Sadik, M.D.'s credentials?
Natalie Sadik, M.D.'s NPI is 1609262948 with credentials M.D.. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) — 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.