PlainDoctor

2026 NPPES data Nurse Practitioner NPI 1801051339 ARNP
Verify on CMS →

Natalie Williams, ARNP

Nurse Practitioner in Seattle, Washington.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 87,700 in Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
161
Medicare Part D claims · 49 beneficiaries · Nurse Practitioner avg: 1K
MIPS score
93.1/100
▲ 10 pts above national avg 83.5 · Exceptional
Verify NPI on CMS Methodology
Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

What the federal data shows

Natalie Williams, ARNP reported a CMS MIPS final score of 93.1/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 161 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

93.1/100
MIPS score · +10 vs avg
161
Part D claims, 2023
≥69th
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1801051339 · Nurse Practitioner

NPI-10 · ENUM-MID · TAX-MEGA · MIPS-ABOVE · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-LIGHT · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1801051339
  • ENUM-MID 2008
  • TAX-MEGA 88K Nurse Practitioner
  • MIPS-ABOVE 93.1/100
  • RX-LIGHT 161
  • BOOK-LIGHT 2,085 in Washington
  • PHOTO-FINISH Mallory Dupriest · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Natalie Williams, ARNP's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

93 ≥ 69th percentile 69% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Below this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Natalie Williams, ARNP sits

This provider among nurse practitioner peers

Across the 13,205 nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Natalie Williams, ARNP writes more Part D claims than 31% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 69% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.148.372.496.6Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Natalie Williams, ARNP, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 31 · MIPS quality, percentile: 69
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Natalie Williams, ARNP. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Natalie Williams, ARNP?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 07/24/2008

NPI 1801051339

Primary specialty

Nurse Practitioner

High-volume

87,700 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

161 85% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,084

MIPS final score

93.1/100 9.6 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Washington

How Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among Washington providers

Washington providers
Mental Health Counselor8.6%Massage Therapist6.5%Counselor5.7%Behavior Technician4.5%Pharmacist4%Physical Therapist3.6%Nurse Practitioner1%
Largest specialties in Washington (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Natalie Williams, ARNP's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Nurse Practitioner national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
93.1/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%93.1%
MIPS final score (Nurse Practitioner) - 93.1/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

1959 NE PACIFIC ST
Seattle, WA 98195
(206) 520-5000

Provider Details

NPI 1801051339
Specialty Nurse Practitioner
Credentials ARNP
Gender Female
NPI Issued 07/24/2008

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

93.0932
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
73.9573
Quality
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Alternative Payment Model

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Natalie Williams, ARNP bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

The Association OF University Physicians
Seattle, WA

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

License & disciplinary context - Washington WMC 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~34K Washington medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Natalie Williams, ARNP. To verify Natalie Williams, ARNP's current license status, search the WMC public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

88
Total board actions, Washington 2023
Across 85 cases
2.59
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Washington statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
31 cases

WMC publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Washington disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

161
Total Claims
$18K
Total Drug Cost
49
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
167
Total Day Supply
2,835
Generic Drug Cost
$3K
Opioid Claims
38 (23.6% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
13

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
70.7 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.64
Gender Split
53% female / 47% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Natalie Williams, ARNP prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Oxycodone Hcl
 29
Ondansetron Odt
Ondansetron
22
Enoxaparin Sodium
 21
Pantoprazole Sodium
 15

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

More Nurse Practitioner in WA → All providers in Washington → Compare specialties →

Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Natalie Williams, ARNP fits within the Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

87,700
Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
56
States with Nurse Practitioner
1,084
Avg Claims per Provider

Natalie Williams, ARNP's 161 claims are below the specialty average of 1,084.

Nationwide Nurse Practitioner peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Williams, both outside Washington so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (93.1 here).

Mallory Dupriest 93.1 TX Holly Irvin 93.1 MA Anna Pfouts 93.1 CO Corneliu Volosen 93.1 OR

Same NPPES enumeration year (2008)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Adam Blanks Jackson, MS Connie Wolford Stanford, CA Katie O'Brien Worcester, MA Erin Ruud Bloomington, IL

Nearby Nurse Practitioner Providers in Washington

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Washington, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Williams.

One of 2,085 Nurse Practitioner providers enrolled in Washington, 5 are shown here.

Saada Abdela
Seattle, WA
Dr. Glenda Abercrombie
ARNP, FNP-C
Yakima, WA
Dr. Brenda Abraham
N.P.
Bremerton, WA
Dr. Hemlal Acharya
ARNP PHMNP-BC, MS
Auburn, WA
Dr. Marja Adair
ARNP
Richland, WA

Compare Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Natalie Williams, ARNP's specialty? ▼
Natalie Williams, ARNP specializes in Nurse Practitioner and practices in Seattle, Washington. Credentials: ARNP.
How much does Natalie Williams, ARNP prescribe under Medicare Part D? ▼
In 2023, Natalie Williams, ARNP wrote 161 Medicare Part D claims totaling $18K in drug costs for 49 beneficiaries.
What is Natalie Williams, ARNP's Medicare quality score? ▼
Natalie Williams, ARNP has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 93.1/100 (Quality: 74). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Natalie Williams, ARNP located? ▼
Natalie Williams, ARNP is located at 1959 NE PACIFIC ST, Seattle, WA, 98195. Phone: (206) 520-5000.
What is Natalie Williams, ARNP's NPI number? ▼
Natalie Williams, ARNP's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1801051339, issued on 07/24/2008.
Does Natalie Williams, ARNP prescribe opioids? ▼
Yes, Natalie Williams, ARNP had 38 opioid claims in 2023 with an opioid prescribing rate of 23.6%.
How many Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US? ▼
There are 87,700 Nurse Practitioner providers across 56 states in the US. The average Nurse Practitioner provider writes 1,084 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Natalie Williams, ARNP prescribe most often? ▼
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Natalie Williams, ARNP's most frequently prescribed drugs include Oxycodone Hcl, Ondansetron Odt, Enoxaparin Sodium. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Natalie Williams, ARNP accept Medicare? ▼
Natalie Williams, ARNP appears in CMS Medicare data with 161 Part D claims and 49 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Natalie Williams, ARNP's credentials? ▼
Natalie Williams, ARNP's NPI is 1801051339 with credentials ARNP. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.