PlainDoctor

2026 NPPES data Radiation Oncology Physician NPI 1225343072 M.D./PH.D.
Verify on CMS →

Nathan Cannon, M.D./PH.D.

Radiation Oncology Physician in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 6,141 in Radiation Oncology Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
221
Medicare Part D claims · 108 beneficiaries · Radiation Oncology Physician avg: 135
Generic prescribing
92%
generic claims · 8% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
100/100
▲ 17 pts above national avg 83.5 · Exceptional
Verify NPI on CMS Methodology
Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

What the federal data shows

Nathan Cannon, M.D./PH.D. reported a CMS MIPS final score of 100/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 221 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

100/100
MIPS score · +17 vs avg
221
Part D claims, 2024
92%
generic prescribing
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Nathan Cannon, M.D./PH.D.

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1225343072), first enumerated 08/17/2010.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 221 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 100/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Board certification signal

    Heuristic suggests board-certified status based on ABMS-eligible specialty taxonomy plus active CMS participation signals — not a direct ABMS verification.

    Source: NUCC taxonomy + CMS participation heuristic

  • Reported

    Hospital affiliations

    1 CMS Care Compare hospital affiliation on record — practice footprint from the Doctors and Clinicians file.

    Source: CMS Care Compare

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1225343072 · Radiation Oncology Physician

NPI-10 · ENUM-MID · TAX-MID · MIPS-ELITE · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1225343072
  • ENUM-MID 2010
  • TAX-MID 6K Radiation Oncology
  • MIPS-ELITE 100/100
  • RX-LIGHT 221
  • BOOK-THIN 120 in Indiana
  • PHOTO-FINISH Cynthia Anderson, M.D. · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Nathan Cannon, M.D./PH.D.'s MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

100 ≥ 92nd percentile 92% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Below this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Nathan Cannon, M.D./PH.D. sits

This provider among radiation oncology physician peers

Across the 1,834 radiation oncology physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Nathan Cannon, M.D./PH.D. writes more Part D claims than 82% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 92% - placing this provider in the high-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.148.372.496.6Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Nathan Cannon, M.D./PH.D., Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one radiation oncology physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Nathan Cannon, M.D./PH.D.. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

✓
Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Nathan Cannon, M.D./PH.D. practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting + 1 hospital affiliation - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Nathan Cannon, M.D./PH.D.?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 08/17/2010

NPI 1225343072

Primary specialty

Radiation Oncology Physician

Mid-sized

6,141 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

221 64% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 135

MIPS final score

100/100 16.5 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Indiana

How Radiation Oncology Physician compares to other specialties among Indiana providers

Indiana providers
Behavior Technician14.3%Student in an Organized Heal…4.8%Pharmacist4.3%Clinical Social Worker4.2%Family Nurse Practitioner4.2%Mental Health Counselor4.1%Radiation Oncology Physician0.1%
Largest specialties in Indiana (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Nathan Cannon, M.D./PH.D.'s 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Radiation Oncology Physician national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
100/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%99%
MIPS final score (Radiation Oncology Physician) - 100/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

11050 PARKVIEW CIRCLE DR
Fort Wayne, IN 46845
(260) 266-9100

Provider Details

NPI 1225343072
Specialty Radiation Oncology Physician
Credentials M.D./PH.D.
Gender Male
NPI Issued 08/17/2010

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

100
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
100
Quality

Reporting: Individual

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Nathan Cannon, M.D./PH.D. bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Radiation Oncology Associates P C
Fort Wayne, IN

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Generic-heavy

Nathan Cannon, M.D./PH.D. - brand share 8.0%
Radiation Oncology Physician average

8% brand-name claims vs 92% generic, on 221 2024 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

221
Total Claims
$3K
Total Drug Cost
108
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
404.1
Total Day Supply
10,776
Brand vs Generic
8% brand / 92% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$98
Generic Drug Cost
$3K
Antibiotic Claims
11

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
73.1 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.74
Gender Split
34% female / 66% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Nathan Cannon, M.D./PH.D. prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Tamsulosin Hcl
 64
Levothyroxine Sodium
 35
Memantine Hcl
 23
Dexamethasone
 15

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

More Radiation Oncology Physician in IN → All providers in Indiana → Compare specialties →

Radiation Oncology Physician Overview

How Nathan Cannon, M.D./PH.D. fits within the Radiation Oncology Physician landscape nationally.

6,141
Radiation Oncology Physician Providers in US
53
States with Radiation Oncology Physician
135
Avg Claims per Provider

Nathan Cannon, M.D./PH.D.'s 221 claims are above the specialty average of 135.

Nationwide Radiation Oncology Physician peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Cannon, both outside Indiana so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (100 here).

Cynthia Anderson 100 FL Sukhjeet Batth 100 CA Matthew Biagioli 100 FL Guy Bucy 100 FL

Same NPPES enumeration year (2010)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Jack Bagley Grand Junction, CO John Godsey Ocean Springs, MS Michelle Gentile Philadelphia, PA Puneeth Iyengar Dallas, TX

Nearby Radiation Oncology Physician Providers in Indiana

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Indiana, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Cannon.

One of 120 Radiation Oncology Physician providers enrolled in Indiana, 5 are shown here.

Dr. Scott Ackley
MD
Terre Haute, IN
Dr. Anwar Ahmad
M.D.
Hobart, IN
Dr. Frederick Albrink
MD
Jeffersonville, IN
Dr. Joy Allen
MD
Michigan City, IN
Dr. Francis Asamoah
MD
Indianapolis, IN

Compare Radiation Oncology Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Nathan Cannon, M.D./PH.D.'s specialty? ▼
Nathan Cannon, M.D./PH.D. specializes in Radiation Oncology Physician and practices in Fort Wayne, Indiana. Credentials: M.D./PH.D..
How much does Nathan Cannon, M.D./PH.D. prescribe under Medicare Part D? ▼
In 2024, Nathan Cannon, M.D./PH.D. wrote 221 Medicare Part D claims totaling $3K in drug costs for 108 beneficiaries.
What is Nathan Cannon, M.D./PH.D.'s Medicare quality score? ▼
Nathan Cannon, M.D./PH.D. has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 100/100 (Quality: 100). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Nathan Cannon, M.D./PH.D. located? ▼
Nathan Cannon, M.D./PH.D. is located at 11050 PARKVIEW CIRCLE DR, Fort Wayne, IN, 46845. Phone: (260) 266-9100.
What is Nathan Cannon, M.D./PH.D.'s NPI number? ▼
Nathan Cannon, M.D./PH.D.'s National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1225343072, issued on 08/17/2010.
Does Nathan Cannon, M.D./PH.D. prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs? ▼
Nathan Cannon, M.D./PH.D.'s prescribing is 8% brand-name and 92% generic drugs by claim count, with $98 in brand drug costs.
How many Radiation Oncology Physician providers are there in the US? ▼
There are 6,141 Radiation Oncology Physician providers across 53 states in the US. The average Radiation Oncology Physician provider writes 135 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Nathan Cannon, M.D./PH.D. prescribe most often? ▼
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Nathan Cannon, M.D./PH.D.'s most frequently prescribed drugs include Tamsulosin Hcl, Levothyroxine Sodium, Memantine Hcl. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Nathan Cannon, M.D./PH.D. accept Medicare? ▼
Nathan Cannon, M.D./PH.D. appears in CMS Medicare data with 221 Part D claims and 108 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Nathan Cannon, M.D./PH.D.'s credentials? ▼
Nathan Cannon, M.D./PH.D.'s NPI is 1225343072 with credentials M.D./PH.D.. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.