PlainDoctor

2026 NPPES data Radiation Oncology Physician NPI 1447243670 M.D.
Verify on CMS →

Nathan Floyd, M.D.

Radiation Oncology Physician in Lexington, North Carolina.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 6,141 in Radiation Oncology Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
152
Medicare Part D claims · 64 beneficiaries · Radiation Oncology Physician avg: 135
MIPS score
98.3/100
▲ 15 pts above national avg 83.5 · Exceptional
Verify NPI on CMS Methodology
Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

What the federal data shows

Nathan Floyd, M.D. reported a CMS MIPS final score of 98.3/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 152 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

98.3/100
MIPS score · +15 vs avg
152
Part D claims, 2024
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)
≥89th
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Nathan Floyd, M.D.

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1447243670), first enumerated 08/23/2005.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 152 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 98.3/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Board certification signal

    Heuristic suggests board-certified status based on ABMS-eligible specialty taxonomy plus active CMS participation signals — not a direct ABMS verification.

    Source: NUCC taxonomy + CMS participation heuristic

  • Reported

    Hospital affiliations

    1 CMS Care Compare hospital affiliation on record — practice footprint from the Doctors and Clinicians file.

    Source: CMS Care Compare

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1447243670 · Radiation Oncology Physician

NPI-10 · ENUM-LEGACY · TAX-MID · MIPS-ELITE · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1447243670
  • ENUM-LEGACY 2005
  • TAX-MID 6K Radiation Oncology
  • MIPS-ELITE 98.3/100
  • RX-LIGHT 152
  • BOOK-THIN 201 in North Carolina
  • PHOTO-FINISH Jaymeson Stroud, M.D. · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Nathan Floyd, M.D.'s MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

98 ≥ 89th percentile 89% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Below this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Nathan Floyd, M.D. sits

This provider among radiation oncology physician peers

Across the 1,834 radiation oncology physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Nathan Floyd, M.D. writes more Part D claims than 69% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 87% - placing this provider in the high-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100022.845.768.591.3Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Nathan Floyd, M.D., Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 69 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one radiation oncology physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Nathan Floyd, M.D.. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

✓
Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Nathan Floyd, M.D. practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting + 1 hospital affiliation - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Nathan Floyd, M.D.?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 08/23/2005

NPI 1447243670

Primary specialty

Radiation Oncology Physician

Mid-sized

6,141 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

152 13% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 135

MIPS final score

98.3/100 14.8 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in North Carolina

How Radiation Oncology Physician compares to other specialties among North Carolina providers

North Carolina providers
Clinical Social Worker7.1%Behavior Technician6.8%Pharmacist4.9%Student in an Organized Heal…4.7%Physical Therapist4.2%Mental Health Counselor4.2%Radiation Oncology Physician0.1%
Largest specialties in North Carolina (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Nathan Floyd, M.D.'s 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Radiation Oncology Physician national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
98.3/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%98.3%
MIPS final score (Radiation Oncology Physician) - 98.3/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

107 W MEDICAL PARK DR
Lexington, NC 27292
(336) 713-0033

Provider Details

NPI 1447243670
Specialty Radiation Oncology Physician
Credentials M.D.
Gender Male
NPI Issued 08/23/2005

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

98.3
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
98
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Nathan Floyd, M.D. bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Lexington, NC

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

152
Total Claims
$4K
Total Drug Cost
64
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
194.033
Total Day Supply
4,794
Generic Drug Cost
$3K

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
70.3 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
2.01
Gender Split
48% female / 52% male
Age Distribution
<65: 14, 65-74: 32, 75-84: N/A, 85+: N/A

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Nathan Floyd, M.D. prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Tamsulosin Hcl
 34
Mometasone Furoate
 33
Famotidine
 12

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

More Radiation Oncology Physician in NC → All providers in North Carolina → Compare specialties →

Radiation Oncology Physician Overview

How Nathan Floyd, M.D. fits within the Radiation Oncology Physician landscape nationally.

6,141
Radiation Oncology Physician Providers in US
53
States with Radiation Oncology Physician
135
Avg Claims per Provider

Nathan Floyd, M.D.'s 152 claims are above the specialty average of 135.

Nationwide Radiation Oncology Physician peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Floyd, both outside North Carolina so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (98.3 here).

Jaymeson Stroud 98.3 FL Chul Ha 98.3 TX Michael Goodman 98.3 GA Sandra Gregory 98.3 GA

Same NPPES enumeration year (2005)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

David Moylan New Philadelphia, PA Angel Blanco Corpus Christi, TX Bonnie Goins Saint Joseph, MO Jason Hayes Mankato, MN

Nearby Radiation Oncology Physician Providers in North Carolina

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in North Carolina, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Floyd.

One of 201 Radiation Oncology Physician providers enrolled in North Carolina, 5 are shown here.

Dr. Mustafa Abugideiri
MD
Wilmington, NC
Dr. Jeffrey Acker
M.D.
Pinehurst, NC
Dr. Quentin Adams
M.D.
Winston Salem, NC
Dr. Mark Alden
MD
Greenville, NC
Karen Allen
NP
Durham, NC

Compare Radiation Oncology Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Nathan Floyd, M.D.'s specialty? ▼
Nathan Floyd, M.D. specializes in Radiation Oncology Physician and practices in Lexington, North Carolina. Credentials: M.D..
How much does Nathan Floyd, M.D. prescribe under Medicare Part D? ▼
In 2024, Nathan Floyd, M.D. wrote 152 Medicare Part D claims totaling $4K in drug costs for 64 beneficiaries.
What is Nathan Floyd, M.D.'s Medicare quality score? ▼
Nathan Floyd, M.D. has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 98.3/100. The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Nathan Floyd, M.D. located? ▼
Nathan Floyd, M.D. is located at 107 W MEDICAL PARK DR, Lexington, NC, 27292. Phone: (336) 713-0033.
What is Nathan Floyd, M.D.'s NPI number? ▼
Nathan Floyd, M.D.'s National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1447243670, issued on 08/23/2005.
How many Radiation Oncology Physician providers are there in the US? ▼
There are 6,141 Radiation Oncology Physician providers across 53 states in the US. The average Radiation Oncology Physician provider writes 135 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Nathan Floyd, M.D. prescribe most often? ▼
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Nathan Floyd, M.D.'s most frequently prescribed drugs include Tamsulosin Hcl, Mometasone Furoate, Famotidine. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Nathan Floyd, M.D. accept Medicare? ▼
Nathan Floyd, M.D. appears in CMS Medicare data with 152 Part D claims and 64 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Nathan Floyd, M.D.'s credentials? ▼
Nathan Floyd, M.D.'s NPI is 1447243670 with credentials M.D.. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.