2026 NPPES data Optometrist NPI 1588812390 O.D.
Verify on CMS →

Nathan Frank, O.D.

Optometrist in Anchorage, Alaska.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 60,484 in Optometrist, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
256
Medicare Part D claims · 103 beneficiaries · Optometrist avg: 257
Generic prescribing
16%
generic claims · 84% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
67.5/100
▼ 16 pts below national avg 83.1 · Mid-tier
Industry payments
$137.36
5 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Nathan Frank, O.D. reported a CMS MIPS final score of 67.5/100 - below the 83.1 national average - and filed 256 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

67.5/100
MIPS score · -16 vs avg
256
Part D claims, 2023
16%
generic prescribing
$137.36
industry payments (Sunshine Act)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Nathan Frank, O.D.'s MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure

68 7th percentile higher than 7% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). This entry sits in this band. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Above this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Nathan Frank, O.D. sits

This provider among optometrist peers

Across the 6,527 optometrist providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Nathan Frank, O.D. writes more Part D claims than 39% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 14% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.949.974.899.8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePart D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Nathan Frank, O.D.-Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 39 · MIPS quality, percentile: 14
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one optometrist peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Nathan Frank, O.D.. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Nathan Frank, O.D.?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 09/04/2008

NPI 1588812390

Primary specialty

Optometrist

High-volume

60,484 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

256 0% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 257

MIPS final score

67.5/100 15.6 pts vs avg

Mid-tier band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Alaska

How Optometrist compares to other specialties among Alaska providers

Alaska providers
Community Health Worker - 7.6%Community Health Worker7.6%Mental Health Counselor - 7.6%Mental Health Counselor7.6%Case Manager/Care Coordinator - 6.2%Case Manager/Care Coordinator6.2%Behavior Technician - 4.7%Behavior Technician4.7%Registered Nurse - 4.7%Registered Nurse4.7%Counselor - 4.4%Counselor4.4%Optometrist - 0.7%Optometrist0.7%
Largest specialties in Alaska (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Nathan Frank, O.D.'s 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Optometrist national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
67.5/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Optometrist) - 67.5/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%67.5%
MIPS final score (Optometrist) - 67.5/100 vs national avg 83.1
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Nathan Frank, O.D. appears in the CMS NPPES registry as an Optometrist provider holding O.D. credentials at 5955 ZEAMER AVE, Anchorage, AK, 99506, with a listed phone of (907) 580-2020. NPI 1588812390 was issued on 09/04/2008.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 256 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 103 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $403K in drug spend, split 84% brand-name and 16% generic by claim count. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 67.5/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 35), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Optometrist is a high-volume specialty nationwide, with 60,484 enrolled providers across 56 states and an average of 257 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline.

Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist, always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

5955 ZEAMER AVE
Anchorage, AK 99506

Provider Details

NPI 1588812390
Specialty Optometrist
Credentials O.D.
Gender Male
NPI Issued 09/04/2008

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

67.5
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
35
Quality

Reporting: Group practice

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Nathan Frank, O.D.. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$137

Largest payer

Alcon Vision LLC

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Brand-heavy

Nathan Frank, O.D. - brand share 84.0%
Optometrist average

84% brand-name claims vs 16% generic, on 256 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

256
Total Claims
$403K
Total Drug Cost
103
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
491
Total Day Supply
14,113
Brand vs Generic
84% brand / 16% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$397K
Generic Drug Cost
$7K

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
74.8 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
0.79
Gender Split
75% female / 25% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Nathan Frank, O.D. prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Xiidra
Lifitegrast
57
Loteprednol Etabonate
39
Lotemax Sm
Loteprednol Etabonate
21
Latanoprost
12

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Optometrist Overview

How Nathan Frank, O.D. fits within the Optometrist landscape nationally.

60,484
Optometrist Providers in US
56
States with Optometrist
257
Avg Claims per Provider

Nathan Frank, O.D.'s 256 claims are below the specialty average of 257.

Nearby Optometrist Providers in Alaska

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Alaska, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Frank.

Compare Optometrist nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry, providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Alaska medical board, federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Optometrist peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only, they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Nathan Frank, O.D.'s specialty?
Nathan Frank, O.D. specializes in Optometrist and practices in Anchorage, Alaska. Credentials: O.D..
How much does Nathan Frank, O.D. prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Nathan Frank, O.D. wrote 256 Medicare Part D claims totaling $403K in drug costs for 103 beneficiaries.
What is Nathan Frank, O.D.'s Medicare quality score?
Nathan Frank, O.D. has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 67.5/100 (Quality: 35). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Nathan Frank, O.D. located?
Nathan Frank, O.D. is located at 5955 ZEAMER AVE, Anchorage, AK, 99506. Phone: (907) 580-2020.
What is Nathan Frank, O.D.'s NPI number?
Nathan Frank, O.D.'s National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1588812390, issued on 09/04/2008.
Does Nathan Frank, O.D. prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Nathan Frank, O.D.'s prescribing is 84% brand-name and 16% generic drugs by claim count, with $397K in brand drug costs.
How many Optometrist providers are there in the US?
There are 60,484 Optometrist providers across 56 states in the US. The average Optometrist provider writes 257 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Nathan Frank, O.D. prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Nathan Frank, O.D.'s most frequently prescribed drugs include Xiidra, Loteprednol Etabonate, Lotemax Sm. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Nathan Frank, O.D. accept Medicare?
Nathan Frank, O.D. appears in CMS Medicare data with 256 Part D claims and 103 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Nathan Frank, O.D.'s credentials?
Nathan Frank, O.D.'s NPI is 1588812390 with credentials O.D.. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.