PlainDoctor

2026 NPPES data Oncology Clinical Nurse Specialist NPI 1356353791 C.N.P.
Verify on CMS →

Nathan Rousse, C.N.P.

Oncology Clinical Nurse Specialist in Traverse City, Michigan.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 211 in Oncology Clinical Nurse Specialist, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
11
Medicare Part D claims · Oncology Clinical Nurse Specialist avg: 435
MIPS score
100/100
▲ 17 pts above national avg 83.5 · Exceptional
Verify NPI on CMS Methodology
Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

What the federal data shows

Nathan Rousse, C.N.P. reported a CMS MIPS final score of 100/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 11 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

100/100
MIPS score · +17 vs avg
11
Part D claims, 2023
≥92nd
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1356353791 · Oncology Clinical Nurse Specialist

NPI-10 · ENUM-LEGACY · TAX-TRACE · MIPS-ELITE · RX-TRACE · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1356353791
  • ENUM-LEGACY 2006
  • TAX-TRACE 211
  • MIPS-ELITE 100/100
  • RX-TRACE 11
  • BOOK-THIN 5 in Michigan
  • PHOTO-FINISH Lisa Neuenfeldt · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Nathan Rousse, C.N.P.'s MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

100 ≥ 92nd percentile 92% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Below this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Nathan Rousse, C.N.P. sits

This provider among oncology clinical nurse specialist peers

Across the 29 oncology clinical nurse specialist providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Nathan Rousse, C.N.P. writes more Part D claims than 0% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 90% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.448.873.297.7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 36 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 11 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 54 · MIPS quality, percentile: 86Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 61 · MIPS quality, percentile: 4Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 46 · MIPS quality, percentile: 64Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 61Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 96 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 21Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 4 · MIPS quality, percentile: 39Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 89 · MIPS quality, percentile: 11Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 54Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 71 · MIPS quality, percentile: 86Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 36Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 79 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 86 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 21 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 29 · MIPS quality, percentile: 71Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 64 · MIPS quality, percentile: 14Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 14 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 29 · MIPS quality, percentile: 29Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 79Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 46Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 54Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 39 · MIPS quality, percentile: 64Nathan Rousse, C.N.P., Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one oncology clinical nurse specialist peer from a representative sample of 28; the gold marker is Nathan Rousse, C.N.P.. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Nathan Rousse, C.N.P.?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 08/13/2006

NPI 1356353791

Primary specialty

Oncology Clinical Nurse Specialist

Rare

211 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

11 97% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 435

MIPS final score

100/100 16.5 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Michigan

How Oncology Clinical Nurse Specialist compares to other specialties among Michigan providers

Michigan providers
Behavior Technician21.4%Clinical Social Worker5.8%Student in an Organized Heal…3.6%Physical Therapist3.4%Social Worker3.4%Pharmacist3%Oncology Clinical Nurse Spec…0%
Largest specialties in Michigan (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Nathan Rousse, C.N.P.'s 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Oncology Clinical Nurse Specialist national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
100/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%99%
MIPS final score (Oncology Clinical Nurse Specialist) - 100/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

217 S MADISON STREET
Traverse City, MI 49684
(231) 922-9270

Provider Details

NPI 1356353791
Specialty Oncology Clinical Nurse Specialist
Credentials C.N.P.
Gender Male
NPI Issued 08/13/2006

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

100
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Nathan Rousse, C.N.P. bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

According to CMS billing records, Nathan Rousse, C.N.P. is affiliated with 3 Medicare-billing facilities.

Kalkaska Memorial Health Center
Kalkaska, MI
Critical Access Hospitals
CMS CCN: 231301
Munson Healthcare Cadillac
Cadillac, MI
Munson Healthcare Grayling
Grayling, MI

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

License & disciplinary context - Michigan MI-BOM 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~41K Michigan medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Nathan Rousse, C.N.P.. To verify Nathan Rousse, C.N.P.'s current license status, search the MI-BOM public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

123
Total board actions, Michigan 2023
Across 120 cases
3.00
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Michigan statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
44 cases

MI-BOM publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Michigan disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

11
Total Claims
$86
Total Drug Cost
N/A
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
11
Total Day Supply
234
Brand Drug Cost
$0
Generic Drug Cost
$86

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
79.5 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
2.32
More Oncology Clinical Nurse Specialist in MI → All providers in Michigan → Compare specialties →

Oncology Clinical Nurse Specialist Overview

How Nathan Rousse, C.N.P. fits within the Oncology Clinical Nurse Specialist landscape nationally.

211
Oncology Clinical Nurse Specialist Providers in US
39
States with Oncology Clinical Nurse Specialist
435
Avg Claims per Provider

Nathan Rousse, C.N.P.'s 11 claims are below the specialty average of 435.

Nationwide Oncology Clinical Nurse Specialist peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Rousse, both outside Michigan so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (100 here).

Lisa Neuenfeldt 100 FL Patricia Fann 99.1 CA Rose Hiu 99.1 CA Linda Janisch 97.7 IL

Same NPPES enumeration year (2006)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Tammie Thompson Canton, OH Giustina Brechbill Canton, OH Laura Moore Cleveland, OH Mary Duong Los Angeles, CA

Nearby Oncology Clinical Nurse Specialist Providers in Michigan

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Michigan, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Rousse.

One of 5 Oncology Clinical Nurse Specialist providers enrolled in Michigan, 4 are shown here.

Dr. Grace Brown
MSN, RN, AGCNS-BC
Grand Rapids, MI
Dr. Kelsey Hebel
AGCNS-BC
Detroit, MI
Dr. Christine Olree
R.N.
Grand Rapids, MI
Dr. Randa Preihs
NP
Grand Rapids, MI

Compare Oncology Clinical Nurse Specialist nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Nathan Rousse, C.N.P.'s specialty? ▼
Nathan Rousse, C.N.P. specializes in Oncology Clinical Nurse Specialist and practices in Traverse City, Michigan. Credentials: C.N.P..
How much does Nathan Rousse, C.N.P. prescribe under Medicare Part D? ▼
In 2023, Nathan Rousse, C.N.P. wrote 11 Medicare Part D claims totaling $86 in drug costs for N/A beneficiaries.
What is Nathan Rousse, C.N.P.'s Medicare quality score? ▼
Nathan Rousse, C.N.P. has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 100/100. The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Nathan Rousse, C.N.P. located? ▼
Nathan Rousse, C.N.P. is located at 217 S MADISON STREET, Traverse City, MI, 49684. Phone: (231) 922-9270.
What is Nathan Rousse, C.N.P.'s NPI number? ▼
Nathan Rousse, C.N.P.'s National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1356353791, issued on 08/13/2006.
How many Oncology Clinical Nurse Specialist providers are there in the US? ▼
There are 211 Oncology Clinical Nurse Specialist providers across 39 states in the US. The average Oncology Clinical Nurse Specialist provider writes 435 Medicare Part D claims per year.
Does Nathan Rousse, C.N.P. accept Medicare? ▼
Nathan Rousse, C.N.P. appears in CMS Medicare data with 11 Part D claims and N/A Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Nathan Rousse, C.N.P.'s credentials? ▼
Nathan Rousse, C.N.P.'s NPI is 1356353791 with credentials C.N.P.. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.