2026 NPPES data Urology Physician NPI 1629696794 MD, PHD
Verify on CMS →

Nathaniel Oswald, MD, PHD

Urology Physician in Provo, Utah.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 13,606 in Urology Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
289
Medicare Part D claims · 153 beneficiaries · Urology Physician avg: 1K
MIPS score
78.6/100
▼ 5 pts below national avg 83.5 · Above neutral
Industry payments
$206.68
5 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)

What the federal data shows

Nathaniel Oswald, MD, PHD reported a CMS MIPS final score of 78.6/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 289 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

78.6/100
MIPS score · -5 vs avg
289
Part D claims, 2024
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)
≥23rd
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Nathaniel Oswald, MD, PHD

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1629696794), first enumerated 07/06/2020.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 289 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 78.6/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Board certification signal

    Heuristic suggests board-certified status based on ABMS-eligible specialty taxonomy plus active CMS participation signals — not a direct ABMS verification.

    Source: NUCC taxonomy + CMS participation heuristic

  • Reported

    Hospital affiliations

    3 CMS Care Compare hospital affiliations on record — practice footprint from the Doctors and Clinicians file.

    Source: CMS Care Compare

  • Reported

    Industry payment transparency

    $206.68 in reported industry payments (5 transfers) in 2024 under the federal Sunshine Act — disclosed transfers of value, not a quality rating.

    Source: CMS Open Payments

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1629696794 · Urology Physician

NPI-10 · ENUM-RECENT · TAX-MID · MIPS-BELOW · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1629696794
  • ENUM-RECENT 2020
  • TAX-MID 14K Urology Physician
  • MIPS-BELOW 78.6/100
  • RX-LIGHT 289
  • BOOK-THIN 96 in Utah
  • PHOTO-FINISH Haidar Abdul-Muhsin · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Nathaniel Oswald, MD, PHD's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

79 ≥ 23rd percentile 23% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). This entry sits in this band. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Nathaniel Oswald, MD, PHD sits

This provider among urology physician peers

Across the 4,091 urology physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Nathaniel Oswald, MD, PHD writes more Part D claims than 16% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 22% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.949.974.899.8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Nathaniel Oswald, MD, PHD, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 16 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one urology physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Nathaniel Oswald, MD, PHD. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Nathaniel Oswald, MD, PHD practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting + 3 hospital affiliations - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Nathaniel Oswald, MD, PHD?

Near national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 07/06/2020

NPI 1629696794

Primary specialty

Urology Physician

Mid-sized

13,606 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

289 79% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,354

MIPS final score

78.6/100 4.9 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Utah

How Urology Physician compares to other specialties among Utah providers

Utah providers
Behavior Technician13%Clinical Social Worker6.3%Community Health Worker5.9%Case Manager/Care Coordinator5.7%Counselor4.7%Student in an Organized Heal…4.5%Urology Physician0.1%
Largest specialties in Utah (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Nathaniel Oswald, MD, PHD's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Urology Physician national average

Near national average
MIPS Final Score
78.6/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%78.6%
MIPS final score (Urology Physician) - 78.6/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

395 W COUGAR BLVD STE 704
Provo, UT 84604

Provider Details

NPI 1629696794
Specialty Urology Physician
Credentials MD, PHD
Gender Male
NPI Issued 07/06/2020

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

78.5864
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
69.056
Quality
59.5653
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Nathaniel Oswald, MD, PHD bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

According to CMS billing records, Nathaniel Oswald, MD, PHD is affiliated with 3 Medicare-billing facilities across 2 states.

Ihc Health Services Inc
Provo, UT
Mayo Clinic Arizona
Scottsdale, AZ
Northern Arizona Healthcare Corporation
Flagstaff, AZ

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Nathaniel Oswald, MD, PHD. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$207

Largest payer

Boston Scientific Corporation

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

289
Total Claims
$23K
Total Drug Cost
153
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
417.033
Total Day Supply
9,505
Generic Drug Cost
$7K
Opioid Claims
15 (5.2% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
98

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
74.6 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.51
Gender Split
21% female / 79% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Nathaniel Oswald, MD, PHD prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Tamsulosin Hcl
47
Nitrofurantoin Mono-Macro
Nitrofurantoin Monohyd/M-Cryst
20
Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim
Sulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim
20
Trospium Chloride
19
Methenamine Hippurate
18
Myrbetriq
Mirabegron
18
Oxycodone Hcl
15
Doxycycline Hyclate
14
Ciprofloxacin Hcl
12

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Urology Physician Overview

How Nathaniel Oswald, MD, PHD fits within the Urology Physician landscape nationally.

13,606
Urology Physician Providers in US
54
States with Urology Physician
1,354
Avg Claims per Provider

Nathaniel Oswald, MD, PHD's 289 claims are below the specialty average of 1,354.

Nationwide Urology Physician peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Oswald, both outside Utah so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (78.6 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2020)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Urology Physician Providers in Utah

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Utah, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Oswald.

One of 96 Urology Physician providers enrolled in Utah, 5 are shown here.

Compare Urology Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Nathaniel Oswald, MD, PHD's specialty?
Nathaniel Oswald, MD, PHD specializes in Urology Physician and practices in Provo, Utah. Credentials: MD, PHD.
How much does Nathaniel Oswald, MD, PHD prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Nathaniel Oswald, MD, PHD wrote 289 Medicare Part D claims totaling $23K in drug costs for 153 beneficiaries.
What is Nathaniel Oswald, MD, PHD's Medicare quality score?
Nathaniel Oswald, MD, PHD has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 78.6/100 (Quality: 69.1, Cost: 59.6). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Nathaniel Oswald, MD, PHD located?
Nathaniel Oswald, MD, PHD is located at 395 W COUGAR BLVD STE 704, Provo, UT, 84604. Phone: (866) 415-6556.
What is Nathaniel Oswald, MD, PHD's NPI number?
Nathaniel Oswald, MD, PHD's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1629696794, issued on 07/06/2020.
Does Nathaniel Oswald, MD, PHD prescribe opioids?
Yes, Nathaniel Oswald, MD, PHD had 15 opioid claims in 2024 with an opioid prescribing rate of 5.2%.
How many Urology Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 13,606 Urology Physician providers across 54 states in the US. The average Urology Physician provider writes 1,354 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Nathaniel Oswald, MD, PHD prescribe most often?
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Nathaniel Oswald, MD, PHD's most frequently prescribed drugs include Tamsulosin Hcl, Nitrofurantoin Mono-Macro, Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Nathaniel Oswald, MD, PHD accept Medicare?
Nathaniel Oswald, MD, PHD appears in CMS Medicare data with 289 Part D claims and 153 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Nathaniel Oswald, MD, PHD's credentials?
Nathaniel Oswald, MD, PHD's NPI is 1629696794 with credentials MD, PHD. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.