2026 NPPES data Acute Care Nurse Practitioner NPI 1992479679 ARNP
Verify on CMS →

Nicole Alsaker, ARNP

Acute Care Nurse Practitioner in Washington, Iowa.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 25,345 in Acute Care Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
7K
Medicare Part D claims · 663 beneficiaries · Acute Care Nurse Practitioner avg: 623
Generic prescribing
58%
generic claims · 42% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
7.5/100
▼ 76 pts below national avg 83.5 · Penalty band
Industry payments
$205.54
9 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)

What the federal data shows

Nicole Alsaker, ARNP reported a CMS MIPS final score of 7.5/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 6,921 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

7.5/100
MIPS score · -76 vs avg
7K
Part D claims, 2024
58%
generic prescribing
$205.54
industry payments (Sunshine Act)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Nicole Alsaker, ARNP

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1992479679), first enumerated 08/05/2021.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 6,921 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 7.5/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Industry payment transparency

    $205.54 in reported industry payments (9 transfers) in 2024 under the federal Sunshine Act — disclosed transfers of value, not a quality rating.

    Source: CMS Open Payments

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1992479679 · Acute Care Nurse Practitioner

NPI-10 · ENUM-RECENT · TAX-MID · MIPS-LOW · RX-MID · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1992479679
  • ENUM-RECENT 2021
  • TAX-MID 25K Acute Care
  • MIPS-LOW 7.5/100
  • RX-MID 6,921
  • BOOK-THIN 172 in Iowa
  • PHOTO-FINISH Justina George, APRN · ±0.6

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Nicole Alsaker, ARNP's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

8 ≥ 2nd percentile 2% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). This entry sits in this band. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Above this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Above this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Above this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Above this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Above this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Above this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Nicole Alsaker, ARNP sits

This provider among acute care nurse practitioner peers

Across the 3,830 acute care nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Nicole Alsaker, ARNP writes more Part D claims than 99% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 0% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100023.146.269.392.4Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Nicole Alsaker, ARNP, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 99 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one acute care nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Nicole Alsaker, ARNP. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Nicole Alsaker, ARNP?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 08/05/2021

NPI 1992479679

Primary specialty

Acute Care Nurse Practitioner

Mid-sized

25,345 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

6,921 11× vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 623

MIPS final score

7.5/100 76 pts vs avg

Penalty band band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Iowa

How Acute Care Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among Iowa providers

Iowa providers
Pharmacist6.5%Physical Therapist5.4%Mental Health Counselor5%Family Medicine Physician4.7%Clinical Social Worker4.2%Chiropractor4.1%Acute Care Nurse Practitioner0.4%
Largest specialties in Iowa (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Nicole Alsaker, ARNP's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Acute Care Nurse Practitioner national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
7.5/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%7.5%
MIPS final score (Acute Care Nurse Practitioner) - 7.5/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

400 E POLK ST
Washington, IA 52353

Provider Details

NPI 1992479679
Specialty Acute Care Nurse Practitioner
Credentials ARNP
Gender Female
NPI Issued 08/05/2021

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

7.5
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
0
Quality

Reporting: Group practice

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Nicole Alsaker, ARNP. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$206

Largest payer

Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc.

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Above average

Nicole Alsaker, ARNP - brand share 42.0%
Acute Care Nurse Practitioner average

42% brand-name claims vs 58% generic, on 6,921 2024 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

6,921
Total Claims
$2.1M
Total Drug Cost
663
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
9,669.467
Total Day Supply
271,000
Brand vs Generic
42% brand / 58% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$2.0M
Generic Drug Cost
$73K
Antibiotic Claims
719

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
74.1 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.55
Gender Split
55% female / 45% male
Age Distribution
<65: 53, 65-74: 291, 75-84: 237, 85+: 82

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Nicole Alsaker, ARNP prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Trelegy Ellipta
Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter
1,229
Montelukast Sodium
878
Albuterol Sulfate Hfa
Albuterol Sulfate
763
Azithromycin
582
Famotidine
390
Pantoprazole Sodium
327
Prednisone
296
Breo Ellipta
Fluticasone/Vilanterol
210
Breztri Aerosphere
Budesonide/Glycopyr/Formoterol
173
Roflumilast
158

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Nicole Alsaker, ARNP fits within the Acute Care Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

25,345
Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
53
States with Acute Care Nurse Practitioner
623
Avg Claims per Provider

Nicole Alsaker, ARNP's 6,921 claims are above the specialty average of 623.

Nationwide Acute Care Nurse Practitioner peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Alsaker, both outside Iowa so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (7.5 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2021)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Providers in Iowa

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Iowa, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Alsaker.

One of 172 Acute Care Nurse Practitioner providers enrolled in Iowa, 5 are shown here.

Compare Acute Care Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Nicole Alsaker, ARNP's specialty?
Nicole Alsaker, ARNP specializes in Acute Care Nurse Practitioner and practices in Washington, Iowa. Credentials: ARNP.
How much does Nicole Alsaker, ARNP prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Nicole Alsaker, ARNP wrote 6,921 Medicare Part D claims totaling $2.1M in drug costs for 663 beneficiaries.
What is Nicole Alsaker, ARNP's Medicare quality score?
Nicole Alsaker, ARNP has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 7.5/100 (Quality: 0). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Nicole Alsaker, ARNP located?
Nicole Alsaker, ARNP is located at 400 E POLK ST, Washington, IA, 52353. Phone: (319) 863-3936.
What is Nicole Alsaker, ARNP's NPI number?
Nicole Alsaker, ARNP's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1992479679, issued on 08/05/2021.
Does Nicole Alsaker, ARNP prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Nicole Alsaker, ARNP's prescribing is 42% brand-name and 58% generic drugs by claim count, with $2.0M in brand drug costs.
How many Acute Care Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US?
There are 25,345 Acute Care Nurse Practitioner providers across 53 states in the US. The average Acute Care Nurse Practitioner provider writes 623 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Nicole Alsaker, ARNP prescribe most often?
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Nicole Alsaker, ARNP's most frequently prescribed drugs include Trelegy Ellipta, Montelukast Sodium, Albuterol Sulfate Hfa. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Nicole Alsaker, ARNP accept Medicare?
Nicole Alsaker, ARNP appears in CMS Medicare data with 6,921 Part D claims and 663 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Nicole Alsaker, ARNP's credentials?
Nicole Alsaker, ARNP's NPI is 1992479679 with credentials ARNP. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.