2026 NPPES data Urology Physician NPI 1912910787 M.D.
Verify on CMS →

Noah Schenkman, M.D.

Urology Physician in Charlottesville, Virginia. This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers — including 13,350 in Urology Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration — see our methodology.

Federal data — no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is — no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
272
Medicare Part D claims · 97 beneficiaries · Urology Physician avg: 1K
Generic prescribing
86%
generic claims · 14% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
79.4/100
▼ 4 pts below national avg 83.1 · Above neutral
Industry payments
$350.46
3 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Noah Schenkman, M.D. reported a CMS MIPS final score of 79.4/100 — below the 83.1 national average — and filed 272 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

79.4/100
MIPS score · -4 vs avg
272
Part D claims, 2023
86%
generic prescribing
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) — no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Noah Schenkman, M.D.'s MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023 — the federal quality measure

79 30th percentile higher than 30% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). This entry sits in this band. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Above this entry. 90–100: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Noah Schenkman, M.D. sits

This provider among urology physician peers

Across the 4,623 urology physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Noah Schenkman, M.D. writes more Part D claims than 14% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 34% — placing this provider in the lower-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume — percentile in specialtyMIPS quality — percentilePart D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality — percentile: 87Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality — percentile: 78Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality — percentile: 52Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality — percentile: 17Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality — percentile: 60Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality — percentile: 55Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality — percentile: 63Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality — percentile: 97Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality — percentile: 50Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality — percentile: 45Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality — percentile: 17Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality — percentile: 77Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality — percentile: 53Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality — percentile: 2Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality — percentile: 95Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality — percentile: 0Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality — percentile: 15Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality — percentile: 38Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality — percentile: 87Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality — percentile: 42Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality — percentile: 5Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality — percentile: 97Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality — percentile: 68Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality — percentile: 72Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality — percentile: 37Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality — percentile: 58Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality — percentile: 40Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality — percentile: 93Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality — percentile: 12Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality — percentile: 17Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality — percentile: 73Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality — percentile: 97Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality — percentile: 17Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality — percentile: 8Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality — percentile: 3Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality — percentile: 45Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality — percentile: 65Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality — percentile: 17Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality — percentile: 35Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality — percentile: 62Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality — percentile: 57Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality — percentile: 10Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality — percentile: 7Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality — percentile: 67Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality — percentile: 17Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality — percentile: 17Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality — percentile: 48Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality — percentile: 80Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality — percentile: 17Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality — percentile: 75Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality — percentile: 17Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality — percentile: 70Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality — percentile: 83Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality — percentile: 82Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality — percentile: 17Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality — percentile: 17Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality — percentile: 87Noah Schenkman, M.D. — Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 14 · MIPS quality — percentile: 34
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one urology physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Noah Schenkman, M.D.. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic — not verified)

Noah Schenkman, M.D. practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting — signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Noah Schenkman, M.D.?

Near national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 08/14/2006

NPI 1912910787

Primary specialty

Urology Physician

Mid-sized

13,350 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

272 79% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,280

MIPS final score

79.4/100 3.7 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Virginia

How Urology Physician compares to other specialties among Virginia providers

Virginia providers

Largest specialties in Virginia (% of in-state providers)

Behavior Technician — 5.2%Behavior Technician5.2%Clinical Social Worker — 5.1%Clinical Social Worker5.1%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program — 4.7%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program4.7%Physical Therapist — 4.6%Physical Therapist4.6%Pharmacist — 4.5%Pharmacist4.5%Professional Counselor — 4%Professional Counselor4%Urology Physician — 0.2%Urology Physician0.2%
Largest specialties in Virginia (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance — MIPS

Noah Schenkman, M.D.'s 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Urology Physician national average

Near national average
MIPS Final Score
79.4/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Urology Physician) — 79.4/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%79.4%
MIPS final score (Urology Physician) — 79.4/100 vs national avg 83.1

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Noah Schenkman, M.D. appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Urology Physician provider holding M.D. credentials at UVA HOSPITAL W, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, with a listed phone of (434) 924-2224. NPI 1912910787 was issued on 08/14/2006. Because NPPES data is self-reported by the provider and refreshed monthly, the address, phone, and specialty reflect what Schenkman most recently submitted to CMS rather than a vetted directory listing, which is why patients should always confirm the practice is still at this location before scheduling.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 272 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 97 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $32K in drug spend, split 14% brand-name and 86% generic by claim count. These figures capture only Medicare Part D — commercial insurance, Medicaid, and cash-pay prescriptions are not included, and any drug-beneficiary cell under 11 is suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 79.4/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 73.7, Cost 57.7), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Urology Physician is a mid-sized specialty nationwide, with 13,350 enrolled providers across 54 states and an average of 1,280 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline. Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist — always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

UVA HOSPITAL W
Charlottesville, VA 22908

Provider Details

NPI 1912910787
Specialty Urology Physician
Credentials M.D.
Gender Male
NPI Issued 08/14/2006

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

79.3949
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
73.6607
Quality
57.6556
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Industry payments received (2024) — CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Noah Schenkman, M.D.. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$350

Largest payer

C. R. Bard, Inc. & Subsidiaries

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias — they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Typical

Noah Schenkman, M.D. — brand share 14.0%
Urology Physician average

14% brand-name claims vs 86% generic, on 272 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

272
Total Claims
$32K
Total Drug Cost
97
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
711
Total Day Supply
20,755
Brand vs Generic
14% brand / 86% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$25K
Generic Drug Cost
$8K
Antibiotic Claims
25

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
74.2 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.55
Gender Split
20% female / 80% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Noah Schenkman, M.D. prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Tamsulosin Hcl
93
Finasteride
54
Myrbetriq
Mirabegron
28
Oxybutynin Chloride Er
Oxybutynin Chloride
18
Potassium Citrate Er
Potassium Citrate
15
Nitrofurantoin
Nitrofurantoin Macrocrystal
14

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Urology Physician Overview

How Noah Schenkman, M.D. fits within the Urology Physician landscape nationally.

13,350
Urology Physician Providers in US
54
States with Urology Physician
1,280
Avg Claims per Provider

Noah Schenkman, M.D.'s 272 claims are below the specialty average of 1,280.

Nearby Urology Physician Providers in Virginia

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Virginia, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Schenkman.

Compare Urology Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry — providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Virginia medical board — federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Urology Physician peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only — they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Noah Schenkman, M.D.'s specialty?
Noah Schenkman, M.D. specializes in Urology Physician and practices in Charlottesville, Virginia. Credentials: M.D..
How much does Noah Schenkman, M.D. prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Noah Schenkman, M.D. wrote 272 Medicare Part D claims totaling $32K in drug costs for 97 beneficiaries.
What is Noah Schenkman, M.D.'s Medicare quality score?
Noah Schenkman, M.D. has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 79.4/100 (Quality: 73.7, Cost: 57.7). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Noah Schenkman, M.D. located?
Noah Schenkman, M.D. is located at UVA HOSPITAL W, Charlottesville, VA, 22908. Phone: (434) 924-2224.
What is Noah Schenkman, M.D.'s NPI number?
Noah Schenkman, M.D.'s National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1912910787, issued on 08/14/2006.
Does Noah Schenkman, M.D. prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Noah Schenkman, M.D.'s prescribing is 14% brand-name and 86% generic drugs by claim count, with $25K in brand drug costs.
How many Urology Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 13,350 Urology Physician providers across 54 states in the US. The average Urology Physician provider writes 1,280 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Noah Schenkman, M.D. prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Noah Schenkman, M.D.'s most frequently prescribed drugs include Tamsulosin Hcl, Finasteride, Myrbetriq. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Noah Schenkman, M.D. accept Medicare?
Noah Schenkman, M.D. appears in CMS Medicare data with 272 Part D claims and 97 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Noah Schenkman, M.D.'s credentials?
Noah Schenkman, M.D.'s NPI is 1912910787 with credentials M.D.. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) — 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.