Noelle Andrychowicz, APRN, CNP
Registered Nurse in Springdale, Arkansas.
This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 185,440 in Registered Nurse, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.
Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File, 2024
What the federal data shows
Noelle Andrychowicz, APRN, CNP reported a CMS MIPS final score of 83.5/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 2,977 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.
- 83.5/100
- MIPS score · +0 vs avg
- 3K
- Part D claims, 2024
- 91%
- generic prescribing
- $150.54
- industry payments (Sunshine Act)
Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.
Federal trust snapshot
What official records show about Noelle Andrychowicz, APRN, CNP
Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.
- Verified
NPI registry status
Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1629341250), first enumerated 02/13/2012.
Source: CMS NPPES
- Reported
Medicare Part D participation
Filed 2,977 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.
Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF
- Reported
CMS quality reporting (MIPS)
Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 83.5/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.
Source: CMS Quality Payment Program
- Reported
Industry payment transparency
$150.54 in reported industry payments (2 transfers) in 2024 under the federal Sunshine Act — disclosed transfers of value, not a quality rating.
Source: CMS Open Payments
- Not in federal data
Individual sanction lookup
PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.
Source: State medical board / FSMB
This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.
CMS NPPES provider registry desk
NPI 1629341250 · Registered Nurse
NPI-10 · ENUM-MID · TAX-MEGA · MIPS-INLINE · RX-MID · BOOK-LIGHT · PHOTO-FINISH
- NPI-10 1629341250
- ENUM-MID 2012
- TAX-MEGA 185K Registered Nurse
- MIPS-INLINE 83.5/100
- RX-MID 2,977
- BOOK-LIGHT 1,496 in Arkansas
- PHOTO-FINISH Anna Altman, NP-BC · ±0.0
MIPS final-score neighbourhood
Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity
- Andrychowicz · t…
Andrychowicz · this provider
83.5 MIPS pts
- Abby Bathke, NP-…
Abby Bathke, NP-C
83.5 MIPS pts
- Anna Altman, NP-…
Anna Altman, NP-BC
83.5 MIPS pts
- Laura Ashbach · …
Laura Ashbach
83.5 MIPS pts
- Erin Ashby, CRNA…
Erin Ashby, CRNA
83.5 MIPS pts
What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).
Noelle Andrychowicz, APRN, CNP's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.
84 ≥ 39th percentile 39% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.
Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023
Where Noelle Andrychowicz, APRN, CNP sits
This provider among registered nurse peers
Across the 3,271 registered nurse providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Noelle Andrychowicz, APRN, CNP writes more Part D claims than 91% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 42% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.
Each dot is one registered nurse peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Noelle Andrychowicz, APRN, CNP. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.
What does the federal data show about Noelle Andrychowicz, APRN, CNP?
Near national averagePrimary specialty
Medicare Part D claims
MIPS final score
Specialty distribution in Arkansas
How Registered Nurse compares to other specialties among Arkansas providers
Registered Nurse ranks #13 among Arkansas's specialties (2.2% of in-state providers)
Each bar is a specialty's share of the Arkansas provider total, by primary NUCC taxonomy. The highlighted bar is Registered Nurse; the long tail of smaller specialties is omitted for legibility.
Medicare quality performance, MIPS
Noelle Andrychowicz, APRN, CNP's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Registered Nurse national average
- MIPS Final Score
- 83.5/100
- vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
Quality benchmarks
- National MIPS avg 2023 measured reporting year
- Quality dim CMS Quality category
- Cost dim CMS Cost category
- Specialty volume Registered Nurse US NPIs
83.5/100 MIPS final score - 0.0 pts above the 83.5 national average
Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities composite score for the 2023 performance year. Specialty: Registered Nurse. Quality dim: 81.8. Cost dim: 63.3.
How MIPS and board certification work
The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.
Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).
Practice Address
Provider Details
| NPI | 1629341250 |
|---|---|
| Specialty | Registered Nurse |
| Credentials | APRN, CNP |
| Gender | Female |
| NPI Issued | 02/13/2012 |
Verify this provider's license
PlainDoctor pulls this profile from the CMS NPPES public registry. Confirm Noelle Andrychowicz, APRN, CNP's current license status, disciplinary history, and board certifications with the Arkansas State Medical Board in Arkansas before relying on this page for a clinical or care decision.
How we sourced this profile
Profile fields combine the CMS NPPES monthly snapshot (provider directory, taxonomy, and address) with calendar-year 2023 Medicare Part D and MIPS public-use files when records are present. NPI 1629341250 is the unique 10-digit identifier CMS uses to link Andrychowicz across every Medicare, Medicaid, and HIPAA-covered transaction. Read full methodology →
CMS Quality Score (MIPS)
Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.
Reporting: Group practice
Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data
The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Noelle Andrychowicz, APRN, CNP. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.
Total received
$151
Largest payer
ABBVIE INC.
Most common payment type
Food and Beverage
Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.
Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Generic-heavy
8% brand-name claims vs 91% generic, on 2,977 2024 Medicare Part D claims.
The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.
Medicare Part D Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.
Prescribing Breakdown
- 30-Day Fills
- 3,047.533
- Total Day Supply
- 69,502
- Brand vs Generic
- 8% brand / 91% generic
- Brand Drug Cost
- $73K
- Generic Drug Cost
- $110K
- Opioid Claims
- 89 (3.0% rate)
- Antibiotic Claims
- 86
Patient Demographics
- Average Patient Age
- 75.0 years
- Avg HCC Risk Score
- 2.73
- Gender Split
- 69% female / 31% male
- Age Distribution
- <65: 17, 65-74: 45, 75-84: 42, 85+: 20
Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)
Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.
What Noelle Andrychowicz, APRN, CNP prescribes most
Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024
- Gabapentin
Gabapentin
161 claims
- Duloxetine Hcl
Duloxetine Hcl
139 claims
- Pantoprazole Sodium
Pantoprazole Sodium
94 claims
- Tamsulosin Hcl
Tamsulosin Hcl
79 claims
- Furosemide
Furosemide
77 claims
- Lisinopril
Lisinopril
67 claims
- Losartan Potassium 61
Losartan Potassium
61 claims
- Amlodipine Besylate 58
Amlodipine Besylate
58 claims
| Drug | Claims |
|---|---|
| Gabapentin | 161 |
| Duloxetine Hcl | 139 |
| Pantoprazole Sodium | 94 |
| Tamsulosin Hcl | 79 |
| Furosemide | 77 |
| Lisinopril | 67 |
| Losartan Potassium | 61 |
| Amlodipine Besylate | 58 |
| Omeprazole | 58 |
| Trazodone Hcl | 58 |
* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.
Registered Nurse Overview
How Noelle Andrychowicz, APRN, CNP fits within the Registered Nurse landscape nationally.
Noelle Andrychowicz, APRN, CNP's 2,977 claims are above the specialty average of 1,063.
Nationwide Registered Nurse peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year
Two federal-record peer sets for Andrychowicz, both outside Arkansas so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.
Similar MIPS final score
Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (83.5 here).
Same NPPES enumeration year (2012)
Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.
Nearby Registered Nurse Providers in Arkansas
Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Arkansas, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Andrychowicz.
One of 1,496 Registered Nurse providers enrolled in Arkansas, 5 are shown here.
Compare Registered Nurse nationally: see state-by-state distribution →
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Noelle Andrychowicz, APRN, CNP's specialty? ▼
How much does Noelle Andrychowicz, APRN, CNP prescribe under Medicare Part D? ▼
What is Noelle Andrychowicz, APRN, CNP's Medicare quality score? ▼
Where is Noelle Andrychowicz, APRN, CNP located? ▼
What is Noelle Andrychowicz, APRN, CNP's NPI number? ▼
Does Noelle Andrychowicz, APRN, CNP prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs? ▼
Does Noelle Andrychowicz, APRN, CNP prescribe opioids? ▼
How many Registered Nurse providers are there in the US? ▼
What drugs does Noelle Andrychowicz, APRN, CNP prescribe most often? ▼
Does Noelle Andrychowicz, APRN, CNP accept Medicare? ▼
How can I verify Noelle Andrychowicz, APRN, CNP's credentials? ▼
Data Sources
View source datasets and methodology notes
- Provider Directory
- CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
- Specialty Classification
- NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
- Prescribing Data
- CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
- Quality Performance
- CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
- Limitations
- Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.
See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.
Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).
Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology
Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.
Published by
PlainDoctor
Independent public-data reference that compiles, verifies, and contextualizes official datasets. We do not accept compensation from entities we cover, and every dataset cites its originating public source.