2026 NPPES data Primary Care Nurse Practitioner NPI 1013309939 APRN, AGNP
Verify on CMS →

Patrice Lindh, APRN, AGNP

Primary Care Nurse Practitioner in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 10,597 in Primary Care Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
459
Medicare Part D claims · 127 beneficiaries · Primary Care Nurse Practitioner avg: 1K
MIPS score
83.5/100
▲ 0 pts above national avg 83.5 · Above neutral

What the federal data shows

Patrice Lindh, APRN, AGNP reported a CMS MIPS final score of 83.5/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 459 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

83.5/100
MIPS score · +0 vs avg
459
Part D claims, 2024
≥39th
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Patrice Lindh, APRN, AGNP

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1013309939), first enumerated 03/02/2015.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 459 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 83.5/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Hospital affiliations

    1 CMS Care Compare hospital affiliation on record — practice footprint from the Doctors and Clinicians file.

    Source: CMS Care Compare

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1013309939 · Primary Care Nurse Practitioner

NPI-10 · ENUM-MID · TAX-MID · MIPS-INLINE · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1013309939
  • ENUM-MID 2015
  • TAX-MID 11K Primary Care
  • MIPS-INLINE 83.5/100
  • RX-LIGHT 459
  • BOOK-THIN 162 in Minnesota
  • PHOTO-FINISH Kabita Steiny, FNP-C · ±0.1

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Patrice Lindh, APRN, AGNP's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

84 ≥ 39th percentile 39% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). This entry sits in this band. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Patrice Lindh, APRN, AGNP sits

This provider among primary care nurse practitioner peers

Across the 926 primary care nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Patrice Lindh, APRN, AGNP writes more Part D claims than 43% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 40% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Patrice Lindh, APRN, AGNP, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one primary care nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Patrice Lindh, APRN, AGNP. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Patrice Lindh, APRN, AGNP?

Near national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 03/02/2015

NPI 1013309939

Primary specialty

Primary Care Nurse Practitioner

Mid-sized

10,597 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

459 69% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,471

MIPS final score

83.5/100 0 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Minnesota

How Primary Care Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among Minnesota providers

Minnesota providers
Behavior Technician12%Clinical Social Worker4.7%Physical Therapist4%Pharmacist3.7%Student in an Organized Heal…3.4%Mental Health Counselor3.1%Primary Care Nurse Practitio…0.1%
Largest specialties in Minnesota (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Patrice Lindh, APRN, AGNP's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Primary Care Nurse Practitioner national average

Near national average
MIPS Final Score
83.5/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%83.5%
MIPS final score (Primary Care Nurse Practitioner) - 83.5/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

2925 CHICAGO AVE
Minneapolis, MN 55407

Provider Details

NPI 1013309939
Specialty Primary Care Nurse Practitioner
Credentials APRN, AGNP
Gender Female
NPI Issued 03/02/2015

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

83.5331
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
81.7967
Quality
63.3136
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Patrice Lindh, APRN, AGNP bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Allina Health System
Minneapolis, MN

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

459
Total Claims
$17K
Total Drug Cost
127
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
497.633
Total Day Supply
10,598
Generic Drug Cost
$7K
Opioid Claims
36 (7.8% rate)

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
79.5 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
2.23
Gender Split
69% female / 31% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Patrice Lindh, APRN, AGNP prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Losartan Potassium
37
Carvedilol
31
Lisinopril
31
Metoprolol Succinate
26
Oxycodone Hcl
25
Amlodipine Besylate
23
Gabapentin
17
Atorvastatin Calcium
13
Buspirone Hcl
13
Furosemide
13

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Primary Care Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Patrice Lindh, APRN, AGNP fits within the Primary Care Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

10,597
Primary Care Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
54
States with Primary Care Nurse Practitioner
1,471
Avg Claims per Provider

Patrice Lindh, APRN, AGNP's 459 claims are below the specialty average of 1,471.

Nationwide Primary Care Nurse Practitioner peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Lindh, both outside Minnesota so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (83.5 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2015)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Primary Care Nurse Practitioner Providers in Minnesota

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Minnesota, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Lindh.

One of 162 Primary Care Nurse Practitioner providers enrolled in Minnesota, 5 are shown here.

Compare Primary Care Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Patrice Lindh, APRN, AGNP's specialty?
Patrice Lindh, APRN, AGNP specializes in Primary Care Nurse Practitioner and practices in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Credentials: APRN, AGNP.
How much does Patrice Lindh, APRN, AGNP prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Patrice Lindh, APRN, AGNP wrote 459 Medicare Part D claims totaling $17K in drug costs for 127 beneficiaries.
What is Patrice Lindh, APRN, AGNP's Medicare quality score?
Patrice Lindh, APRN, AGNP has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 83.5/100 (Quality: 81.8, Cost: 63.3). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Patrice Lindh, APRN, AGNP located?
Patrice Lindh, APRN, AGNP is located at 2925 CHICAGO AVE, Minneapolis, MN, 55407. Phone: (612) 262-5000.
What is Patrice Lindh, APRN, AGNP's NPI number?
Patrice Lindh, APRN, AGNP's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1013309939, issued on 03/02/2015.
Does Patrice Lindh, APRN, AGNP prescribe opioids?
Yes, Patrice Lindh, APRN, AGNP had 36 opioid claims in 2024 with an opioid prescribing rate of 7.8%.
How many Primary Care Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US?
There are 10,597 Primary Care Nurse Practitioner providers across 54 states in the US. The average Primary Care Nurse Practitioner provider writes 1,471 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Patrice Lindh, APRN, AGNP prescribe most often?
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Patrice Lindh, APRN, AGNP's most frequently prescribed drugs include Losartan Potassium, Carvedilol, Lisinopril. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Patrice Lindh, APRN, AGNP accept Medicare?
Patrice Lindh, APRN, AGNP appears in CMS Medicare data with 459 Part D claims and 127 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Patrice Lindh, APRN, AGNP's credentials?
Patrice Lindh, APRN, AGNP's NPI is 1013309939 with credentials APRN, AGNP. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.