PlainDoctor

2026 NPPES data Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery (Obstetrics & Gynecology) Physician NPI 1750369757 D.O.
Verify on CMS →

Patrick Woodman, D.O.

Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery (Obstetrics & Gynecology) Physician in Warren, Michigan.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 621 in Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery (Obstetrics & Gynecology) Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
400
Medicare Part D claims · 114 beneficiaries · Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery (Obstetrics & Gynecology) Physician avg: 661
Generic prescribing
78%
generic claims · 22% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
81.2/100
▼ 2 pts below national avg 83.5 · Above neutral
Industry payments
$496.8
17 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Verify NPI on CMS Methodology
Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

What the federal data shows

Patrick Woodman, D.O. reported a CMS MIPS final score of 81.2/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 400 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

81.2/100
MIPS score · -2 vs avg
400
Part D claims, 2024
78%
generic prescribing
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Patrick Woodman, D.O.

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1750369757), first enumerated 01/09/2006.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 400 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 81.2/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Board certification signal

    Heuristic suggests board-certified status based on ABMS-eligible specialty taxonomy plus active CMS participation signals — not a direct ABMS verification.

    Source: NUCC taxonomy + CMS participation heuristic

  • Reported

    Industry payment transparency

    $496.8 in reported industry payments (17 transfers) in 2024 under the federal Sunshine Act — disclosed transfers of value, not a quality rating.

    Source: CMS Open Payments

  • State context

    State board disciplinary context

    Michigan statewide board action statistics are published annually — these figures describe aggregate state activity, not Patrick Woodman, D.O.'s individual license status. Verify directly with the state medical board.

    Source: MI-BOM annual report 2023

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1750369757 · Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery (Obstetrics & Gynecology) Physician

NPI-10 · ENUM-LEGACY · TAX-NARROW · MIPS-INLINE · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1750369757
  • ENUM-LEGACY 2006
  • TAX-NARROW 621
  • MIPS-INLINE 81.2/100
  • RX-LIGHT 400
  • BOOK-THIN 20 in Michigan
  • PHOTO-FINISH Toya Gordon · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Patrick Woodman, D.O.'s MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

81 ≥ 32nd percentile 32% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). This entry sits in this band. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Patrick Woodman, D.O. sits

This provider among urogynecology and reconstructive pelvic surgery (obstetrics & gynecology) physician peers

Across the 201 urogynecology and reconstructive pelvic surgery (obstetrics & gynecology) physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Patrick Woodman, D.O. writes more Part D claims than 34% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 38% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.949.974.899.8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Patrick Woodman, D.O., Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 34 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one urogynecology and reconstructive pelvic surgery (obstetrics & gynecology) physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Patrick Woodman, D.O.. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

✓
Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Patrick Woodman, D.O. practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Patrick Woodman, D.O.?

Near national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 01/09/2006

NPI 1750369757

Primary specialty

Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery (Obstetrics & Gynecology) Physician

Niche

621 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

400 39% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 661

MIPS final score

81.2/100 2.3 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Michigan

How Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery (Obstetrics & Gynecology) Physician compares to other specialties among Michigan providers

Michigan providers
Behavior Technician22.2%Clinical Social Worker5.7%Student in an Organized Heal…3.7%Social Worker3.3%Physical Therapist3.3%Pharmacist2.9%Urogynecology and Reconstruc…0%
Largest specialties in Michigan (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Patrick Woodman, D.O.'s 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery (Obstetrics & Gynecology) Physician national average

Near national average
MIPS Final Score
81.2/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%81.2%
MIPS final score (Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery (Obstetrics & Gynecology) Physician) - 81.2/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

11800 E 12 MILE RD
Warren, MI 48093
(586) 576-1615

Provider Details

NPI 1750369757
Specialty Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery (Obstetrics & Gynecology) Physician
Credentials D.O.
Gender Male
NPI Issued 01/09/2006

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

81.234
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
68.9532
Quality
68.4936
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Patrick Woodman, D.O.. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$497

Largest payer

Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc.

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

License & disciplinary context - Michigan MI-BOM 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~41K Michigan medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Patrick Woodman, D.O.. To verify Patrick Woodman, D.O.'s current license status, search the MI-BOM public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

123
Total board actions, Michigan 2023
Across 120 cases
3.00
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Michigan statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
44 cases

MI-BOM publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Michigan disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Typical

Patrick Woodman, D.O. - brand share 22.0%
Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery (Obstetrics & Gynecology) Physician average

22% brand-name claims vs 78% generic, on 400 2024 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

400
Total Claims
$81K
Total Drug Cost
114
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
628.967
Total Day Supply
15,593
Brand vs Generic
22% brand / 78% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$72K
Generic Drug Cost
$9K
Opioid Claims
33 (8.3% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
25

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
72.0 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.22
Gender Split
100% female / 0% male
Age Distribution
<65: 13, 65-74: 56, 75-84: N/A, 85+: N/A

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Patrick Woodman, D.O. prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Estradiol
 66
Gemtesa
Vibegron
42
Solifenacin Succinate
 41
Ibuprofen
 32
Methenamine Hippurate
 31
Oxycodone Hcl
 30
Myrbetriq
Mirabegron
29
Imipramine Hcl
 19
Trospium Chloride Er
Trospium Chloride
14
Premarin
Estrogens, Conjugated
12

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

More Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery (Obstetrics & Gynecology) Physician in MI → All providers in Michigan → Compare specialties →

Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery (Obstetrics & Gynecology) Physician Overview

How Patrick Woodman, D.O. fits within the Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery (Obstetrics & Gynecology) Physician landscape nationally.

621
Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery (Obstetrics & Gynecology) Physician Providers in US
50
States with Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery (Obstetrics & Gynecology) Physician
661
Avg Claims per Provider

Patrick Woodman, D.O.'s 400 claims are below the specialty average of 661.

Nationwide Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery (Obstetrics & Gynecology) Physician peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Woodman, both outside Michigan so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (81.2 here).

Austin Hill 81.2 UT Gita Singh 81.2 IN Toya Gordon 81.2 PA Christopher Pugh 81.2 PA

Same NPPES enumeration year (2006)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Sandra Hernandez El Paso, TX Andrea Wang Anchorage, AK Elliot Greenberg Springfield, MA Felicia Rhaney Columbus, GA

Nearby Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery (Obstetrics & Gynecology) Physician Providers in Michigan

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Michigan, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Woodman.

One of 20 Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery (Obstetrics & Gynecology) Physician providers enrolled in Michigan, 5 are shown here.

Dr. Husam Abed
MD
Southgate, MI
Dr. Mary Ackenbom
MD
Ann Arbor, MI
Dr. Muhammad Aslam
M.D.
Detroit, MI
Dr. Jaclyn Baratono
DO
Brownstown, MI
Dr. Hope Bauer
MD
Grand Rapids, MI

Compare Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery (Obstetrics & Gynecology) Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Patrick Woodman, D.O.'s specialty? ▼
Patrick Woodman, D.O. specializes in Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery (Obstetrics & Gynecology) Physician and practices in Warren, Michigan. Credentials: D.O..
How much does Patrick Woodman, D.O. prescribe under Medicare Part D? ▼
In 2024, Patrick Woodman, D.O. wrote 400 Medicare Part D claims totaling $81K in drug costs for 114 beneficiaries.
What is Patrick Woodman, D.O.'s Medicare quality score? ▼
Patrick Woodman, D.O. has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 81.2/100 (Quality: 69, Cost: 68.5). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Patrick Woodman, D.O. located? ▼
Patrick Woodman, D.O. is located at 11800 E 12 MILE RD, Warren, MI, 48093. Phone: (586) 576-1615.
What is Patrick Woodman, D.O.'s NPI number? ▼
Patrick Woodman, D.O.'s National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1750369757, issued on 01/09/2006.
Does Patrick Woodman, D.O. prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs? ▼
Patrick Woodman, D.O.'s prescribing is 22% brand-name and 78% generic drugs by claim count, with $72K in brand drug costs.
Does Patrick Woodman, D.O. prescribe opioids? ▼
Yes, Patrick Woodman, D.O. had 33 opioid claims in 2024 with an opioid prescribing rate of 8.3%.
How many Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery (Obstetrics & Gynecology) Physician providers are there in the US? ▼
There are 621 Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery (Obstetrics & Gynecology) Physician providers across 50 states in the US. The average Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery (Obstetrics & Gynecology) Physician provider writes 661 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Patrick Woodman, D.O. prescribe most often? ▼
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Patrick Woodman, D.O.'s most frequently prescribed drugs include Estradiol, Gemtesa, Solifenacin Succinate. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Patrick Woodman, D.O. accept Medicare? ▼
Patrick Woodman, D.O. appears in CMS Medicare data with 400 Part D claims and 114 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Patrick Woodman, D.O.'s credentials? ▼
Patrick Woodman, D.O.'s NPI is 1750369757 with credentials D.O.. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.