2026 NPPES data Radiation Oncology Physician NPI 1316921034 MD
Verify on CMS →

Peter Han, MD

Radiation Oncology Physician in Poughkeepsie, New York.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 6,141 in Radiation Oncology Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
50
Medicare Part D claims · 20 beneficiaries · Radiation Oncology Physician avg: 135
MIPS score
84.1/100
▲ 1 pts above national avg 83.5 · Above neutral

What the federal data shows

Peter Han, MD reported a CMS MIPS final score of 84.1/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 50 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

84.1/100
MIPS score · +1 vs avg
50
Part D claims, 2024
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)
≥42nd
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Peter Han, MD

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1316921034), first enumerated 12/06/2005.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 50 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 84.1/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Board certification signal

    Heuristic suggests board-certified status based on ABMS-eligible specialty taxonomy plus active CMS participation signals — not a direct ABMS verification.

    Source: NUCC taxonomy + CMS participation heuristic

  • Reported

    Hospital affiliations

    1 CMS Care Compare hospital affiliation on record — practice footprint from the Doctors and Clinicians file.

    Source: CMS Care Compare

  • State context

    State board disciplinary context

    New York statewide board action statistics are published annually — these figures describe aggregate state activity, not Peter Han, MD's individual license status. Verify directly with the state medical board.

    Source: NYSBPMC annual report 2023

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1316921034 · Radiation Oncology Physician

NPI-10 · ENUM-LEGACY · TAX-MID · MIPS-INLINE · RX-TRACE · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1316921034
  • ENUM-LEGACY 2005
  • TAX-MID 6K Radiation Oncology
  • MIPS-INLINE 84.1/100
  • RX-TRACE 50
  • BOOK-THIN 404 in New York
  • PHOTO-FINISH Brian Chon · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Peter Han, MD's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

84 ≥ 42nd percentile 42% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). This entry sits in this band. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Peter Han, MD sits

This provider among radiation oncology physician peers

Across the 1,834 radiation oncology physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Peter Han, MD writes more Part D claims than 28% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 41% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100022.845.768.591.3Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Peter Han, MD, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 41
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one radiation oncology physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Peter Han, MD. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Peter Han, MD practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting + 1 hospital affiliation - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Peter Han, MD?

Near national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 12/06/2005

NPI 1316921034

Primary specialty

Radiation Oncology Physician

Mid-sized

6,141 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

50 63% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 135

MIPS final score

84.1/100 0.6 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in New York

How Radiation Oncology Physician compares to other specialties among New York providers

New York providers
Student in an Organized Heal…8%Registered Nurse5.2%Clinical Social Worker4.9%Social Worker4.5%Speech-Language Pathologist4.5%Licensed Practical Nurse4.3%Radiation Oncology Physician0.1%
Largest specialties in New York (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Peter Han, MD's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Radiation Oncology Physician national average

Near national average
MIPS Final Score
84.1/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%84.1%
MIPS final score (Radiation Oncology Physician) - 84.1/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

45 READE PL FL 1
Poughkeepsie, NY 12601

Provider Details

NPI 1316921034
Specialty Radiation Oncology Physician
Credentials MD
Gender Male
NPI Issued 12/06/2005

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

84.1496
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
78.1119
Quality
69.0533
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Peter Han, MD bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Nuvance Health Medical Practice PC
Poughkeepsie, NY

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

License & disciplinary context - New York NYSBPMC 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~100K New York medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Peter Han, MD. To verify Peter Han, MD's current license status, search the NYSBPMC public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

312
Total board actions, New York 2023
Across 302 cases
3.12
Actions per 1,000 licensees
New York statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
89 cases

NYSBPMC publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the New York disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

50
Total Claims
$309
Total Drug Cost
20
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
93.4
Total Day Supply
2,711
Generic Drug Cost
$305

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
75.5 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.47
Age Distribution
<65: 0, 65-74: 12, 75-84: N/A, 85+: N/A

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

Drug Claims
Tamsulosin Hcl
37

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Radiation Oncology Physician Overview

How Peter Han, MD fits within the Radiation Oncology Physician landscape nationally.

6,141
Radiation Oncology Physician Providers in US
53
States with Radiation Oncology Physician
135
Avg Claims per Provider

Peter Han, MD's 50 claims are below the specialty average of 135.

Nationwide Radiation Oncology Physician peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Han, both outside New York so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (84.1 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2005)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Radiation Oncology Physician Providers in New York

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in New York, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Han.

One of 404 Radiation Oncology Physician providers enrolled in New York, 5 are shown here.

Compare Radiation Oncology Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Peter Han, MD's specialty?
Peter Han, MD specializes in Radiation Oncology Physician and practices in Poughkeepsie, New York. Credentials: MD.
How much does Peter Han, MD prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Peter Han, MD wrote 50 Medicare Part D claims totaling $309 in drug costs for 20 beneficiaries.
What is Peter Han, MD's Medicare quality score?
Peter Han, MD has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 84.1/100 (Quality: 78.1, Cost: 69.1). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Peter Han, MD located?
Peter Han, MD is located at 45 READE PL FL 1, Poughkeepsie, NY, 12601. Phone: (845) 431-5645.
What is Peter Han, MD's NPI number?
Peter Han, MD's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1316921034, issued on 12/06/2005.
How many Radiation Oncology Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 6,141 Radiation Oncology Physician providers across 53 states in the US. The average Radiation Oncology Physician provider writes 135 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Peter Han, MD prescribe most often?
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Peter Han, MD's most frequently prescribed drugs include Tamsulosin Hcl. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Peter Han, MD accept Medicare?
Peter Han, MD appears in CMS Medicare data with 50 Part D claims and 20 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Peter Han, MD's credentials?
Peter Han, MD's NPI is 1316921034 with credentials MD. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.