2026 NPPES data Internal Medicine Physician NPI 1134315872 M.D.
Verify on CMS →

Philip Isenberg, M.D.

Internal Medicine Physician in Midvale, Utah.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 172,737 in Internal Medicine Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
6K
Medicare Part D claims · 586 beneficiaries · Internal Medicine Physician avg: 3K
Generic prescribing
84%
generic claims · 15% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
95.7/100
▲ 12 pts above national avg 83.5 · Exceptional

What the federal data shows

Philip Isenberg, M.D. reported a CMS MIPS final score of 95.7/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 6,301 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

95.7/100
MIPS score · +12 vs avg
6K
Part D claims, 2023
84%
generic prescribing
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1134315872 · Internal Medicine Physician

NPI-10 · ENUM-MID · TAX-MEGA · MIPS-ELITE · RX-MID · BOOK-LIGHT · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1134315872
  • ENUM-MID 2007
  • TAX-MEGA 173K Internal Medicine
  • MIPS-ELITE 95.7/100
  • RX-MID 6,301
  • BOOK-LIGHT 982 in Utah
  • PHOTO-FINISH John Berquist · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Philip Isenberg, M.D.'s MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

96 ≥ 78th percentile 78% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Below this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Philip Isenberg, M.D. sits

This provider among internal medicine physician peers

Across the 34,612 internal medicine physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Philip Isenberg, M.D. writes more Part D claims than 85% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 82% - placing this provider in the high-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Philip Isenberg, M.D., Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one internal medicine physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Philip Isenberg, M.D.. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Philip Isenberg, M.D. practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting + 1 hospital affiliation - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Philip Isenberg, M.D.?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 09/17/2007

NPI 1134315872

Primary specialty

Internal Medicine Physician

High-volume

172,737 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

6,301 132% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 2,716

MIPS final score

95.7/100 12.2 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Utah

How Internal Medicine Physician compares to other specialties among Utah providers

Utah providers
Behavior Technician12.4%Clinical Social Worker6.3%Community Health Worker6.1%Case Manager/Care Coordinator5.9%Counselor4.9%Student in an Organized Heal…4.3%Internal Medicine Physician1.3%
Largest specialties in Utah (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Philip Isenberg, M.D.'s 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Internal Medicine Physician national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
95.7/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%95.7%
MIPS final score (Internal Medicine Physician) - 95.7/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

7495 S STATE ST
Midvale, UT 84047

Provider Details

NPI 1134315872
Specialty Internal Medicine Physician
Credentials M.D.
Gender Male
NPI Issued 09/17/2007

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

95.7054
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
92.1917
Quality
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Philip Isenberg, M.D. bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Kaiser Foundation Health Plan OF Washington
Port Orchard, WA

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Typical

Philip Isenberg, M.D. - brand share 15.0%
Internal Medicine Physician average

15% brand-name claims vs 84% generic, on 6,301 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

6,301
Total Claims
$697K
Total Drug Cost
586
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
14,198
Total Day Supply
412,123
Brand vs Generic
15% brand / 84% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$576K
Generic Drug Cost
$119K
Opioid Claims
159 (2.5% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
78

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
72.7 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.19
Gender Split
52% female / 48% male
Age Distribution
<65: 68, 65-74: 257, 75-84: 204, 85+: 57

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Philip Isenberg, M.D. prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Omeprazole
300
Atorvastatin Calcium
281
Amlodipine Besylate
219
Levothyroxine Sodium
213
Lisinopril
209
Rosuvastatin Calcium
180
Metformin Hcl
160
Gabapentin
121
Metoprolol Succinate
113
Losartan Potassium
108

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Internal Medicine Physician Overview

How Philip Isenberg, M.D. fits within the Internal Medicine Physician landscape nationally.

172,737
Internal Medicine Physician Providers in US
56
States with Internal Medicine Physician
2,716
Avg Claims per Provider

Philip Isenberg, M.D.'s 6,301 claims are above the specialty average of 2,716.

Nationwide Internal Medicine Physician peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Isenberg, both outside Utah so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (95.7 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2007)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Internal Medicine Physician Providers in Utah

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Utah, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Isenberg.

One of 982 Internal Medicine Physician providers enrolled in Utah, 5 are shown here.

Compare Internal Medicine Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Philip Isenberg, M.D.'s specialty?
Philip Isenberg, M.D. specializes in Internal Medicine Physician and practices in Midvale, Utah. Credentials: M.D..
How much does Philip Isenberg, M.D. prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Philip Isenberg, M.D. wrote 6,301 Medicare Part D claims totaling $697K in drug costs for 586 beneficiaries.
What is Philip Isenberg, M.D.'s Medicare quality score?
Philip Isenberg, M.D. has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 95.7/100 (Quality: 92.2). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Philip Isenberg, M.D. located?
Philip Isenberg, M.D. is located at 7495 S STATE ST, Midvale, UT, 84047. Phone: (801) 213-9400.
What is Philip Isenberg, M.D.'s NPI number?
Philip Isenberg, M.D.'s National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1134315872, issued on 09/17/2007.
Does Philip Isenberg, M.D. prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Philip Isenberg, M.D.'s prescribing is 15% brand-name and 84% generic drugs by claim count, with $576K in brand drug costs.
Does Philip Isenberg, M.D. prescribe opioids?
Yes, Philip Isenberg, M.D. had 159 opioid claims in 2023 with an opioid prescribing rate of 2.5%.
How many Internal Medicine Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 172,737 Internal Medicine Physician providers across 56 states in the US. The average Internal Medicine Physician provider writes 2,716 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Philip Isenberg, M.D. prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Philip Isenberg, M.D.'s most frequently prescribed drugs include Omeprazole, Atorvastatin Calcium, Amlodipine Besylate. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Philip Isenberg, M.D. accept Medicare?
Philip Isenberg, M.D. appears in CMS Medicare data with 6,301 Part D claims and 586 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Philip Isenberg, M.D.'s credentials?
Philip Isenberg, M.D.'s NPI is 1134315872 with credentials M.D.. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.