2026 NPPES data Geriatric Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician NPI 1841283686 MD
Verify on CMS →

Priscilla Bade, MD

Geriatric Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician in Rapid City, South Dakota.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 4,161 in Geriatric Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
5K
Medicare Part D claims · 206 beneficiaries · Geriatric Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician avg: 4K
Generic prescribing
76%
generic claims · 22% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
97.6/100
▲ 14 pts above national avg 83.1 · Exceptional
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Priscilla Bade, MD reported a CMS MIPS final score of 97.6/100 - above the 83.1 national average - and filed 5,000 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

97.6/100
MIPS score · +14 vs avg
5K
Part D claims, 2023
76%
generic prescribing
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Priscilla Bade, MD's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure

98 Top 15% higher than 85% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Below this entry. 90+: 189,403 scored providers (40%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Priscilla Bade, MD sits

This provider among geriatric medicine (internal medicine) physician peers

Across the 724 geriatric medicine (internal medicine) physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Priscilla Bade, MD writes more Part D claims than 66% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 88% - placing this provider in the high-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePart D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 98Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 98Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Priscilla Bade, MD-Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 66 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one geriatric medicine (internal medicine) physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Priscilla Bade, MD. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Priscilla Bade, MD practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting + 1 hospital affiliation - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Priscilla Bade, MD?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 08/26/2005

NPI 1841283686

Primary specialty

Geriatric Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician

Niche

4,161 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

5,000 12% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 4,450

MIPS final score

97.6/100 14.5 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in South Dakota

How Geriatric Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician compares to other specialties among South Dakota providers

South Dakota providers
Physical Therapist - 5.6%Physical Therapist5.6%Pharmacist - 5.5%Pharmacist5.5%Registered Nurse - 4.8%Registered Nurse4.8%Family Nurse Practitioner - 4.7%Family Nurse Practitioner4.7%Mental Health Counselor - 4%Mental Health Counselor4%Physician Assistant - 3.7%Physician Assistant3.7%Geriatric Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician - 0%Geriatric Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician0%
Largest specialties in South Dakota (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Priscilla Bade, MD's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Geriatric Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
97.6/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Geriatric Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician) - 97.6/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%97.6%
MIPS final score (Geriatric Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician) - 97.6/100 vs national avg 83.1
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Priscilla Bade, MD appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Geriatric Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician provider holding MD credentials at 224 ELK ST, Rapid City, SD, 57701, with a listed phone of (605) 755-7710. NPI 1841283686 was issued on 08/26/2005.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 5,000 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 206 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $355K in drug spend, split 22% brand-name and 76% generic by claim count, with an opioid prescribing rate of 1.5%. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 97.6/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 86.5), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Geriatric Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician is a narrow specialty nationwide, with 4,161 enrolled providers across 52 states and an average of 4,450 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline.

Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist, always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

224 ELK ST
Rapid City, SD 57701

Provider Details

NPI 1841283686
Specialty Geriatric Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician
Credentials MD
Gender Female
NPI Issued 08/26/2005

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

97.5814
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
86.5348
Quality
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Alternative Payment Model

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Priscilla Bade, MD bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Monument Health Rapid City Hospital Inc
Rapid City, SD

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Typical

Priscilla Bade, MD - brand share 22.0%
Geriatric Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician average

22% brand-name claims vs 76% generic, on 5,000 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

5,000
Total Claims
$355K
Total Drug Cost
206
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
5,017
Total Day Supply
109,471
Brand vs Generic
22% brand / 76% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$205K
Generic Drug Cost
$147K
Opioid Claims
73 (1.5% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
77

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
81.7 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.99
Gender Split
77% female / 23% male
Age Distribution
<65: 13, 65-74: 39, 75-84: 60, 85+: 94

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Priscilla Bade, MD prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Levothyroxine Sodium
353
Furosemide
225
Lisinopril
220
Potassium Chloride
205
Sertraline Hcl
196
Eliquis
Apixaban
189
Metoprolol Tartrate
152
Atorvastatin Calcium
132
Quetiapine Fumarate
132
Amlodipine Besylate
128

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Geriatric Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician Overview

How Priscilla Bade, MD fits within the Geriatric Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician landscape nationally.

4,161
Geriatric Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician Providers in US
52
States with Geriatric Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician
4,450
Avg Claims per Provider

Priscilla Bade, MD's 5,000 claims are above the specialty average of 4,450.

Nearby Geriatric Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician Providers in South Dakota

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in South Dakota, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Bade.

Compare Geriatric Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry, providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the South Dakota medical board, federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Geriatric Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only, they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Priscilla Bade, MD's specialty?
Priscilla Bade, MD specializes in Geriatric Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician and practices in Rapid City, South Dakota. Credentials: MD.
How much does Priscilla Bade, MD prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Priscilla Bade, MD wrote 5,000 Medicare Part D claims totaling $355K in drug costs for 206 beneficiaries.
What is Priscilla Bade, MD's Medicare quality score?
Priscilla Bade, MD has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 97.6/100 (Quality: 86.5). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Priscilla Bade, MD located?
Priscilla Bade, MD is located at 224 ELK ST, Rapid City, SD, 57701. Phone: (605) 755-7710.
What is Priscilla Bade, MD's NPI number?
Priscilla Bade, MD's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1841283686, issued on 08/26/2005.
Does Priscilla Bade, MD prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Priscilla Bade, MD's prescribing is 22% brand-name and 76% generic drugs by claim count, with $205K in brand drug costs.
Does Priscilla Bade, MD prescribe opioids?
Yes, Priscilla Bade, MD had 73 opioid claims in 2023 with an opioid prescribing rate of 1.5%.
How many Geriatric Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 4,161 Geriatric Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician providers across 52 states in the US. The average Geriatric Medicine (Internal Medicine) Physician provider writes 4,450 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Priscilla Bade, MD prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Priscilla Bade, MD's most frequently prescribed drugs include Levothyroxine Sodium, Furosemide, Lisinopril. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Priscilla Bade, MD accept Medicare?
Priscilla Bade, MD appears in CMS Medicare data with 5,000 Part D claims and 206 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Priscilla Bade, MD's credentials?
Priscilla Bade, MD's NPI is 1841283686 with credentials MD. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.