2026 NPPES data Nurse Practitioner NPI 1154953693
Verify on CMS →

Priscilla Reindorf

Nurse Practitioner in San Francisco, California. This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers — including 87,227 in Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration — see our methodology.

Federal data — no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is — no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
62
Medicare Part D claims · 11 beneficiaries · Nurse Practitioner avg: 1K
Generic prescribing
0%
generic claims · 95% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
77.4/100
▼ 6 pts below national avg 83.1 · Above neutral
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Priscilla Reindorf reported a CMS MIPS final score of 77.4/100 — below the 83.1 national average — and filed 62 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

77.4/100
MIPS score · -6 vs avg
62
Part D claims, 2023
0%
generic prescribing

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) — no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Priscilla Reindorf's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023 — the federal quality measure

77 24th percentile higher than 24% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). This entry sits in this band. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Above this entry. 90–100: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Priscilla Reindorf sits

This provider among nurse practitioner peers

Across the 13,476 nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Priscilla Reindorf writes more Part D claims than 14% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 23% — placing this provider in the lower-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.148.372.496.6Part D claim volume — percentile in specialtyMIPS quality — percentilePart D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality — percentile: 58Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality — percentile: 63Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality — percentile: 37Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality — percentile: 90Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality — percentile: 23Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality — percentile: 60Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality — percentile: 75Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality — percentile: 33Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality — percentile: 65Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality — percentile: 38Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality — percentile: 78Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality — percentile: 5Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality — percentile: 55Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality — percentile: 40Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality — percentile: 67Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality — percentile: 42Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality — percentile: 25Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality — percentile: 87Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality — percentile: 20Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality — percentile: 8Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality — percentile: 22Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality — percentile: 75Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality — percentile: 60Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality — percentile: 2Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality — percentile: 15Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality — percentile: 70Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality — percentile: 72Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality — percentile: 28Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality — percentile: 52Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality — percentile: 88Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality — percentile: 73Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality — percentile: 18Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality — percentile: 12Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality — percentile: 7Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality — percentile: 30Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality — percentile: 53Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality — percentile: 80Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality — percentile: 48Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality — percentile: 3Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality — percentile: 0Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality — percentile: 43Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality — percentile: 50Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality — percentile: 33Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality — percentile: 57Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality — percentile: 10Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality — percentile: 17Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality — percentile: 47Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality — percentile: 82Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality — percentile: 68Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality — percentile: 83Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality — percentile: 45Priscilla Reindorf — Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 14 · MIPS quality — percentile: 23
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Priscilla Reindorf. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Priscilla Reindorf?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 02/12/2020

NPI 1154953693

Primary specialty

Nurse Practitioner

High-volume

87,227 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

62 94% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,084

MIPS final score

77.4/100 5.7 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in California

How Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among California providers

California providers

Largest specialties in California (% of in-state providers)

Behavior Technician — 17.3%Behavior Technician17.3%Marriage & Family Therapist — 5.5%Marriage & Family Therapist5.5%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program — 5%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program5%Mental Health Counselor — 3.9%Mental Health Counselor3.9%Pharmacist — 3.5%Pharmacist3.5%Clinical Social Worker — 3.1%Clinical Social Worker3.1%Nurse Practitioner — 0.7%Nurse Practitioner0.7%
Largest specialties in California (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance — MIPS

Priscilla Reindorf's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Nurse Practitioner national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
77.4/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Nurse Practitioner) — 77.4/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%77.4%
MIPS final score (Nurse Practitioner) — 77.4/100 vs national avg 83.1

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Priscilla Reindorf appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Nurse Practitioner provider at 425 CALIFORNIA ST STE 1400, San Francisco, CA, 94104, with a listed phone of (855) 527-1850. NPI 1154953693 was issued on 02/12/2020. Because NPPES data is self-reported by the provider and refreshed monthly, the address, phone, and specialty reflect what Reindorf most recently submitted to CMS rather than a vetted directory listing, which is why patients should always confirm the practice is still at this location before scheduling.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 62 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 11 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $66K in drug spend, split 95% brand-name and 0% generic by claim count. These figures capture only Medicare Part D — commercial insurance, Medicaid, and cash-pay prescriptions are not included, and any drug-beneficiary cell under 11 is suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 77.4/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 81.2, Cost 59.1), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Nurse Practitioner is a high-volume specialty nationwide, with 87,227 enrolled providers across 56 states and an average of 1,084 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline. Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist — always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

425 CALIFORNIA ST STE 1400
San Francisco, CA 94104

Provider Details

NPI 1154953693
Specialty Nurse Practitioner
Gender Female
NPI Issued 02/12/2020

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

77.4044
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
81.2452
Quality
59.065
Cost

Reporting: Group practice

License & disciplinary context — California MBC 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only — NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~150K California medical licensees in 2023 — they are NOT specific to Priscilla Reindorf. To verify Priscilla Reindorf's current license status, search the MBC public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

576
Total board actions, California 2023
Across 556 cases
3.84
Actions per 1,000 licensees
California statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
186 cases

MBC publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the California disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Brand-heavy

Priscilla Reindorf — brand share 95.0%
Nurse Practitioner average

95% brand-name claims vs 0% generic, on 62 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

62
Total Claims
$66K
Total Drug Cost
11
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
73
Total Day Supply
2,174
Brand vs Generic
95% brand / 0% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$66K

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
66.7 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.25

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

Drug Claims
Rybelsus
Semaglutide
36
Ozempic
Semaglutide
14

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Priscilla Reindorf fits within the Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

87,227
Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
56
States with Nurse Practitioner
1,084
Avg Claims per Provider

Priscilla Reindorf's 62 claims are below the specialty average of 1,084.

Nearby Nurse Practitioner Providers in California

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in California, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Reindorf.

Compare Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry — providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the California medical board — federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Nurse Practitioner peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only — they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Priscilla Reindorf's specialty?
Priscilla Reindorf specializes in Nurse Practitioner and practices in San Francisco, California.
How much does Priscilla Reindorf prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Priscilla Reindorf wrote 62 Medicare Part D claims totaling $66K in drug costs for 11 beneficiaries.
What is Priscilla Reindorf's Medicare quality score?
Priscilla Reindorf has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 77.4/100 (Quality: 81.2, Cost: 59.1). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Priscilla Reindorf located?
Priscilla Reindorf is located at 425 CALIFORNIA ST STE 1400, San Francisco, CA, 94104. Phone: (855) 527-1850.
What is Priscilla Reindorf's NPI number?
Priscilla Reindorf's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1154953693, issued on 02/12/2020.
Does Priscilla Reindorf prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Priscilla Reindorf's prescribing is 95% brand-name and 0% generic drugs by claim count, with $66K in brand drug costs.
How many Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US?
There are 87,227 Nurse Practitioner providers across 56 states in the US. The average Nurse Practitioner provider writes 1,084 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Priscilla Reindorf prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Priscilla Reindorf's most frequently prescribed drugs include Rybelsus, Ozempic. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Priscilla Reindorf accept Medicare?
Priscilla Reindorf appears in CMS Medicare data with 62 Part D claims and 11 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Priscilla Reindorf's credentials?
Priscilla Reindorf's NPI is 1154953693. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) — 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.