2026 NPPES data Adult Health Nurse Practitioner NPI 1891039608 NP
Verify on CMS →

Rachel Barish, NP

Adult Health Nurse Practitioner in Washington, District of Columbia.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 29,492 in Adult Health Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
721
Medicare Part D claims · 130 beneficiaries · Adult Health Nurse Practitioner avg: 1K
Generic prescribing
85%
generic claims · 15% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
88.2/100
▲ 5 pts above national avg 83.1 · Above neutral
Industry payments
$2.8K
13 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Rachel Barish, NP reported a CMS MIPS final score of 88.2/100 - above the 83.1 national average - and filed 721 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

88.2/100
MIPS score · +5 vs avg
721
Part D claims, 2023
85%
generic prescribing
$2.8K
industry payments (Sunshine Act)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Rachel Barish, NP's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure

88 Top 44% higher than 56% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). This entry sits in this band. 90+: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Rachel Barish, NP sits

This provider among adult health nurse practitioner peers

Across the 4,289 adult health nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Rachel Barish, NP writes more Part D claims than 63% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 56% - placing this provider in the high-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.448.873.297.7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePart D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Rachel Barish, NP-Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 56
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one adult health nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Rachel Barish, NP. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Rachel Barish, NP?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 11/16/2012

NPI 1891039608

Primary specialty

Adult Health Nurse Practitioner

Mid-sized

29,492 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

721 40% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,201

MIPS final score

88.2/100 5.1 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in District of Columbia

How Adult Health Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among District of Columbia providers

District of Columbia providers
Home Health Aide - 20.8%Home Health Aide20.8%Personal Care Attendant - 11.5%Personal Care Attendant11.5%Case Manager/Care Coordinator - 7%Case Manager/Care Coordinator7%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program - 6.4%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program6.4%Clinical Social Worker - 4%Clinical Social Worker4%Internal Medicine Physician - 2.1%Internal Medicine Physician2.1%Adult Health Nurse Practitioner - 0.2%Adult Health Nurse Practitioner0.2%
Largest specialties in District of Columbia (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Rachel Barish, NP's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Adult Health Nurse Practitioner national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
88.2/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Adult Health Nurse Practitioner) - 88.2/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%88.2%
MIPS final score (Adult Health Nurse Practitioner) - 88.2/100 vs national avg 83.1
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Rachel Barish, NP appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Adult Health Nurse Practitioner provider holding NP credentials at 3800 RESERVOIR RD NW, Washington, DC, 20007, with a listed phone of (202) 444-1294. NPI 1891039608 was issued on 11/16/2012.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 721 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 130 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $100K in drug spend, split 15% brand-name and 85% generic by claim count. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 88.2/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 72.9, Cost 60), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Adult Health Nurse Practitioner is a mid-sized specialty nationwide, with 29,492 enrolled providers across 55 states and an average of 1,201 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline.

Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist, always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

3800 RESERVOIR RD NW
Washington, DC 20007

Provider Details

NPI 1891039608
Specialty Adult Health Nurse Practitioner
Credentials NP
Gender Female
NPI Issued 11/16/2012

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

88.2391
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
72.9364
Quality
60.0002
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Rachel Barish, NP. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$2.8K

Largest payer

AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Typical

Rachel Barish, NP - brand share 15.0%
Adult Health Nurse Practitioner average

15% brand-name claims vs 85% generic, on 721 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

721
Total Claims
$100K
Total Drug Cost
130
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
1,431
Total Day Supply
42,667
Brand vs Generic
15% brand / 85% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$89K
Generic Drug Cost
$11K

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
71.7 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
3.01
Gender Split
52% female / 48% male
Age Distribution
<65: 22, 65-74: 58, 75-84: 37, 85+: 13

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Rachel Barish, NP prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Atorvastatin Calcium
75
Carvedilol
74
Eliquis
Apixaban
55
Metoprolol Succinate
48
Amlodipine Besylate
45
Chlorthalidone
32
Rosuvastatin Calcium
31
Entresto
Sacubitril/Valsartan
30
Hydralazine Hcl
30
Furosemide
29

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Adult Health Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Rachel Barish, NP fits within the Adult Health Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

29,492
Adult Health Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
55
States with Adult Health Nurse Practitioner
1,201
Avg Claims per Provider

Rachel Barish, NP's 721 claims are below the specialty average of 1,201.

Nearby Adult Health Nurse Practitioner Providers in District of Columbia

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in District of Columbia, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Barish.

Compare Adult Health Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry, providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the District of Columbia medical board, federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Adult Health Nurse Practitioner peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only, they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Rachel Barish, NP's specialty?
Rachel Barish, NP specializes in Adult Health Nurse Practitioner and practices in Washington, District of Columbia. Credentials: NP.
How much does Rachel Barish, NP prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Rachel Barish, NP wrote 721 Medicare Part D claims totaling $100K in drug costs for 130 beneficiaries.
What is Rachel Barish, NP's Medicare quality score?
Rachel Barish, NP has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 88.2/100 (Quality: 72.9, Cost: 60). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Rachel Barish, NP located?
Rachel Barish, NP is located at 3800 RESERVOIR RD NW, Washington, DC, 20007. Phone: (202) 444-1294.
What is Rachel Barish, NP's NPI number?
Rachel Barish, NP's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1891039608, issued on 11/16/2012.
Does Rachel Barish, NP prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Rachel Barish, NP's prescribing is 15% brand-name and 85% generic drugs by claim count, with $89K in brand drug costs.
How many Adult Health Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US?
There are 29,492 Adult Health Nurse Practitioner providers across 55 states in the US. The average Adult Health Nurse Practitioner provider writes 1,201 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Rachel Barish, NP prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Rachel Barish, NP's most frequently prescribed drugs include Atorvastatin Calcium, Carvedilol, Eliquis. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Rachel Barish, NP accept Medicare?
Rachel Barish, NP appears in CMS Medicare data with 721 Part D claims and 130 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Rachel Barish, NP's credentials?
Rachel Barish, NP's NPI is 1891039608 with credentials NP. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.