PlainDoctor

2026 NPPES data Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner NPI 1457720765 N.P.
Verify on CMS →

Rachel Kennamer, N.P.

Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner in Phoenix, Arizona.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 2,867 in Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
25
Medicare Part D claims · 13 beneficiaries · Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner avg: 232
MIPS score
87/100
▲ 4 pts above national avg 83.1 · Above neutral
Verify NPI on CMS Methodology
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Rachel Kennamer, N.P. reported a CMS MIPS final score of 87/100 - above the 83.1 national average - and filed 25 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

87/100
MIPS score · +4 vs avg
25
Part D claims, 2023

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Rachel Kennamer, N.P.'s MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure

87 Top 48% higher than 52% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). This entry sits in this band. 90+: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Rachel Kennamer, N.P. sits

This provider among obstetrics & gynecology nurse practitioner peers

Across the 240 obstetrics & gynecology nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Rachel Kennamer, N.P. writes more Part D claims than 11% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 55% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePart D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Rachel Kennamer, N.P.-Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 11 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one obstetrics & gynecology nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Rachel Kennamer, N.P.. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Rachel Kennamer, N.P.?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 09/16/2015

NPI 1457720765

Primary specialty

Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner

Niche

2,867 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

25 89% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 232

MIPS final score

87/100 3.9 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Arizona

How Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among Arizona providers

Arizona providers
Pharmacist - 5.6%Pharmacist5.6%Behavior Technician - 5.6%Behavior Technician5.6%Family Nurse Practitioner - 4.3%Family Nurse Practitioner4.3%Physical Therapist - 4.2%Physical Therapist4.2%Speech-Language Pathologist - 3.5%Speech-Language Pathologist3.5%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program - 3.5%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program3.5%Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner - 0.1%Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner0.1%
Largest specialties in Arizona (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Rachel Kennamer, N.P.'s 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
87/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner) - 87/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%87%
MIPS final score (Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner) - 87/100 vs national avg 83.1
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Rachel Kennamer, N.P. appears in the CMS NPPES registry as an Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner provider holding N.P. credentials at 303 E BASELINE RD, Phoenix, AZ, 85042, with a listed phone of (602) 243-7277. NPI 1457720765 was issued on 09/16/2015.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 25 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 13 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $1K in drug spend. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 87/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 79.4, Cost 54), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner is a narrow specialty nationwide, with 2,867 enrolled providers across 52 states and an average of 232 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline.

Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist, always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

303 E BASELINE RD
Phoenix, AZ 85042
(602) 243-7277

Provider Details

NPI 1457720765
Specialty Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner
Credentials N.P.
Gender Female
NPI Issued 09/16/2015

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

86.9932
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
79.3582
Quality
53.9524
Cost
88
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Rachel Kennamer, N.P. bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Gila River Health Care Corporation
Sacaton, AZ

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

25
Total Claims
$1K
Total Drug Cost
13
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
37
Total Day Supply
991
Generic Drug Cost
$970

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
70.2 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
2.40
Gender Split
100% female / 0% male
More Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner in AZ → All providers in Arizona → Compare specialties →

Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Rachel Kennamer, N.P. fits within the Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

2,867
Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
52
States with Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner
232
Avg Claims per Provider

Rachel Kennamer, N.P.'s 25 claims are below the specialty average of 232.

Nearby Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner Providers in Arizona

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Arizona, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Kennamer.

Dr. Karen Allen
RN/CNM
Phoenix, AZ
Dr. Natalie Andress
CNM
Flagstaff, AZ
Dr. Mary Andrews
NP
Tucson, AZ
Dr. Laura Angeleri
R.N.,N.P.
Scottsdale, AZ
Dr. Melissa Antognini
WHNP
Scottsdale, AZ

Compare Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry, providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Arizona medical board, federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only, they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Healthcare Guides

Learn more about finding, verifying, and understanding healthcare providers.

How to Find a Doctor
Step-by-step guide to choosing a provider
Verify Credentials
Check NPI, board certification & license status
Medical Specialties Explained
Who treats what and how specialties differ
Understanding Medicare Claims Data
What prescribing data reveals about a provider
In-Network vs Out-of-Network
How insurance networks affect your costs
Telehealth Guide
Virtual care options and coverage in 2026

Explore Arizona

Providers in Arizona
Browse all specialties and cities
All Specialties
690+ healthcare specialties
Rankings
Top prescribers and providers by state

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Rachel Kennamer, N.P.'s specialty? ▼
Rachel Kennamer, N.P. specializes in Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner and practices in Phoenix, Arizona. Credentials: N.P..
How much does Rachel Kennamer, N.P. prescribe under Medicare Part D? ▼
In 2023, Rachel Kennamer, N.P. wrote 25 Medicare Part D claims totaling $1K in drug costs for 13 beneficiaries.
What is Rachel Kennamer, N.P.'s Medicare quality score? ▼
Rachel Kennamer, N.P. has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 87/100 (Quality: 79.4, Cost: 54). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Rachel Kennamer, N.P. located? ▼
Rachel Kennamer, N.P. is located at 303 E BASELINE RD, Phoenix, AZ, 85042. Phone: (602) 243-7277.
What is Rachel Kennamer, N.P.'s NPI number? ▼
Rachel Kennamer, N.P.'s National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1457720765, issued on 09/16/2015.
How many Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US? ▼
There are 2,867 Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner providers across 52 states in the US. The average Obstetrics & Gynecology Nurse Practitioner provider writes 232 Medicare Part D claims per year.
Does Rachel Kennamer, N.P. accept Medicare? ▼
Rachel Kennamer, N.P. appears in CMS Medicare data with 25 Part D claims and 13 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Rachel Kennamer, N.P.'s credentials? ▼
Rachel Kennamer, N.P.'s NPI is 1457720765 with credentials N.P.. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.