2026 NPPES data Family Nurse Practitioner NPI 1427511757 APRN
Verify on CMS →

Rachel Rushing, APRN

Family Nurse Practitioner in Vienna, Illinois. This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers — including 209,817 in Family Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration — see our methodology.

Federal data — no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is — no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
3K
Medicare Part D claims · 256 beneficiaries · Family Nurse Practitioner avg: 1K
Generic prescribing
86%
generic claims · 14% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
70.3/100
▼ 13 pts below national avg 83.1 · Mid-tier
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Rachel Rushing, APRN reported a CMS MIPS final score of 70.3/100 — below the 83.1 national average — and filed 3,379 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

70.3/100
MIPS score · -13 vs avg
3K
Part D claims, 2023
86%
generic prescribing

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) — no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Rachel Rushing, APRN's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023 — the federal quality measure

70 8th percentile higher than 8% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). This entry sits in this band. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Above this entry. 90–100: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Rachel Rushing, APRN sits

This provider among family nurse practitioner peers

Across the 27,154 family nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Rachel Rushing, APRN writes more Part D claims than 90% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 8% — placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100022.344.666.989.3Part D claim volume — percentile in specialtyMIPS quality — percentilePart D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality — percentile: 18Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality — percentile: 37Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality — percentile: 15Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality — percentile: 10Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality — percentile: 55Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality — percentile: 72Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality — percentile: 68Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality — percentile: 78Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality — percentile: 5Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality — percentile: 0Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality — percentile: 75Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality — percentile: 8Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality — percentile: 22Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality — percentile: 3Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality — percentile: 25Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality — percentile: 65Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality — percentile: 73Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality — percentile: 43Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality — percentile: 23Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality — percentile: 83Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality — percentile: 12Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality — percentile: 15Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality — percentile: 38Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality — percentile: 48Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality — percentile: 62Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality — percentile: 60Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality — percentile: 33Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality — percentile: 40Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality — percentile: 28Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality — percentile: 70Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality — percentile: 82Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality — percentile: 58Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality — percentile: 53Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality — percentile: 75Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality — percentile: 50Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality — percentile: 30Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality — percentile: 20Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality — percentile: 52Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality — percentile: 80Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality — percentile: 67Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality — percentile: 27Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality — percentile: 63Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality — percentile: 2Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality — percentile: 57Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality — percentile: 35Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality — percentile: 47Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality — percentile: 42Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality — percentile: 43Rachel Rushing, APRN — Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality — percentile: 8
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one family nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Rachel Rushing, APRN. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Rachel Rushing, APRN?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 04/12/2019

NPI 1427511757

Primary specialty

Family Nurse Practitioner

High-volume

209,817 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

3,379 177% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,222

MIPS final score

70.3/100 12.8 pts vs avg

Mid-tier band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Illinois

How Family Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among Illinois providers

Illinois providers

Largest specialties in Illinois (% of in-state providers)

Clinical Social Worker — 5.2%Clinical Social Worker5.2%Physical Therapist — 5%Physical Therapist5%Mental Health Counselor — 4.5%Mental Health Counselor4.5%Speech-Language Pathologist — 4.2%Speech-Language Pathologist4.2%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program — 4.2%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program4.2%Pharmacist — 4.1%Pharmacist4.1%Family Nurse Practitioner — 3%Family Nurse Practitioner3%
Largest specialties in Illinois (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance — MIPS

Rachel Rushing, APRN's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Family Nurse Practitioner national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
70.3/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Family Nurse Practitioner) — 70.3/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%70.3%
MIPS final score (Family Nurse Practitioner) — 70.3/100 vs national avg 83.1

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Rachel Rushing, APRN appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Family Nurse Practitioner provider holding APRN credentials at 6695 HWY 146 E, Vienna, IL, 62995, with a listed phone of (618) 658-8371. NPI 1427511757 was issued on 04/12/2019. Because NPPES data is self-reported by the provider and refreshed monthly, the address, phone, and specialty reflect what Rushing most recently submitted to CMS rather than a vetted directory listing, which is why patients should always confirm the practice is still at this location before scheduling.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 3,379 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 256 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $374K in drug spend, split 14% brand-name and 86% generic by claim count, with an opioid prescribing rate of 6.4%. These figures capture only Medicare Part D — commercial insurance, Medicaid, and cash-pay prescriptions are not included, and any drug-beneficiary cell under 11 is suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 70.3/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 72.9, Cost 31.3), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Family Nurse Practitioner is a high-volume specialty nationwide, with 209,817 enrolled providers across 56 states and an average of 1,222 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline. Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist — always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

6695 HWY 146 E
Vienna, IL 62995

Provider Details

NPI 1427511757
Specialty Family Nurse Practitioner
Credentials APRN
Gender Female
NPI Issued 04/12/2019

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

70.2711
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
72.9479
Quality
31.289
Cost
96
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

License & disciplinary context — Illinois IDFPR 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only — NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~42K Illinois medical licensees in 2023 — they are NOT specific to Rachel Rushing, APRN. To verify Rachel Rushing, APRN's current license status, search the IDFPR public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

106
Total board actions, Illinois 2023
Across 103 cases
2.52
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Illinois statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
38 cases

IDFPR publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Illinois disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Typical

Rachel Rushing, APRN — brand share 14.0%
Family Nurse Practitioner average

14% brand-name claims vs 86% generic, on 3,379 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

3,379
Total Claims
$374K
Total Drug Cost
256
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
6,142
Total Day Supply
179,438
Brand vs Generic
14% brand / 86% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$303K
Generic Drug Cost
$69K
Opioid Claims
215 (6.4% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
48

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
72.7 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.04
Gender Split
60% female / 40% male
Age Distribution
<65: 37, 65-74: 104, 75-84: 90, 85+: 25

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Rachel Rushing, APRN prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Omeprazole
135
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen
Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen
133
Levothyroxine Sodium
129
Lisinopril
104
Pravastatin Sodium
100
Gabapentin
87
Amlodipine Besylate
84
Simvastatin
78
Metoprolol Succinate
76
Metformin Hcl
63

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Family Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Rachel Rushing, APRN fits within the Family Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

209,817
Family Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
56
States with Family Nurse Practitioner
1,222
Avg Claims per Provider

Rachel Rushing, APRN's 3,379 claims are above the specialty average of 1,222.

Nearby Family Nurse Practitioner Providers in Illinois

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Illinois, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Rushing.

Compare Family Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry — providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Illinois medical board — federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Family Nurse Practitioner peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only — they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Rachel Rushing, APRN's specialty?
Rachel Rushing, APRN specializes in Family Nurse Practitioner and practices in Vienna, Illinois. Credentials: APRN.
How much does Rachel Rushing, APRN prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Rachel Rushing, APRN wrote 3,379 Medicare Part D claims totaling $374K in drug costs for 256 beneficiaries.
What is Rachel Rushing, APRN's Medicare quality score?
Rachel Rushing, APRN has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 70.3/100 (Quality: 72.9, Cost: 31.3). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Rachel Rushing, APRN located?
Rachel Rushing, APRN is located at 6695 HWY 146 E, Vienna, IL, 62995. Phone: (618) 658-8371.
What is Rachel Rushing, APRN's NPI number?
Rachel Rushing, APRN's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1427511757, issued on 04/12/2019.
Does Rachel Rushing, APRN prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Rachel Rushing, APRN's prescribing is 14% brand-name and 86% generic drugs by claim count, with $303K in brand drug costs.
Does Rachel Rushing, APRN prescribe opioids?
Yes, Rachel Rushing, APRN had 215 opioid claims in 2023 with an opioid prescribing rate of 6.4%.
How many Family Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US?
There are 209,817 Family Nurse Practitioner providers across 56 states in the US. The average Family Nurse Practitioner provider writes 1,222 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Rachel Rushing, APRN prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Rachel Rushing, APRN's most frequently prescribed drugs include Omeprazole, Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen, Levothyroxine Sodium. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Rachel Rushing, APRN accept Medicare?
Rachel Rushing, APRN appears in CMS Medicare data with 3,379 Part D claims and 256 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Rachel Rushing, APRN's credentials?
Rachel Rushing, APRN's NPI is 1427511757 with credentials APRN. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) — 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.