2026 NPPES data Psychiatric/Mental Health Registered Nurse NPI 1235395732 FNP-C
Verify on CMS →

Rachel Self, FNP-C

Psychiatric/Mental Health Registered Nurse in Carrollton, Texas.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 11,949 in Psychiatric/Mental Health Registered Nurse, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
36
Medicare Part D claims · 19 beneficiaries · Psychiatric/Mental Health Registered Nurse avg: 830
Generic prescribing
64%
generic claims · 36% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
78.2/100
▼ 5 pts below national avg 83.5 · Above neutral
Industry payments
$240.36
8 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)

What the federal data shows

Rachel Self, FNP-C reported a CMS MIPS final score of 78.2/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 36 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

78.2/100
MIPS score · -5 vs avg
36
Part D claims, 2024
64%
generic prescribing
$240.36
industry payments (Sunshine Act)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Rachel Self, FNP-C

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1235395732), first enumerated 08/04/2008.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 36 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 78.2/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Industry payment transparency

    $240.36 in reported industry payments (8 transfers) in 2024 under the federal Sunshine Act — disclosed transfers of value, not a quality rating.

    Source: CMS Open Payments

  • State context

    State board disciplinary context

    Texas statewide board action statistics are published annually — these figures describe aggregate state activity, not Rachel Self, FNP-C's individual license status. Verify directly with the state medical board.

    Source: TMB annual report 2023

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1235395732 · Psychiatric/Mental Health Registered Nurse

NPI-10 · ENUM-MID · TAX-MID · MIPS-BELOW · RX-TRACE · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1235395732
  • ENUM-MID 2008
  • TAX-MID 12K Psychiatric/Mental Health
  • MIPS-BELOW 78.2/100
  • RX-TRACE 36
  • BOOK-THIN 279 in Texas
  • PHOTO-FINISH Christine Asher · ±0.2

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Rachel Self, FNP-C's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

78 ≥ 23rd percentile 23% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). This entry sits in this band. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Rachel Self, FNP-C sits

This provider among psychiatric/mental health registered nurse peers

Across the 110 psychiatric/mental health registered nurse providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Rachel Self, FNP-C writes more Part D claims than 9% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 24% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.148.372.496.6Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Rachel Self, FNP-C, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 9 · MIPS quality, percentile: 24
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one psychiatric/mental health registered nurse peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Rachel Self, FNP-C. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Rachel Self, FNP-C?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 08/04/2008

NPI 1235395732

Primary specialty

Psychiatric/Mental Health Registered Nurse

Mid-sized

11,949 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

36 96% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 830

MIPS final score

78.2/100 5.3 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Texas

How Psychiatric/Mental Health Registered Nurse compares to other specialties among Texas providers

Texas providers
Behavior Technician6%Student in an Organized Heal…5.3%Family Nurse Practitioner4.5%Professional Counselor4.4%Pharmacist4.3%Speech-Language Pathologist3.9%Psychiatric/Mental Health Re…0.1%
Largest specialties in Texas (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Rachel Self, FNP-C's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Psychiatric/Mental Health Registered Nurse national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
78.2/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%78.2%
MIPS final score (Psychiatric/Mental Health Registered Nurse) - 78.2/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

2133 GREENVIEW DR
Carrollton, TX 75010

Provider Details

NPI 1235395732
Specialty Psychiatric/Mental Health Registered Nurse
Credentials FNP-C
Gender Female
NPI Issued 08/04/2008

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

78.1548
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
82.66
Quality
44.5227
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Rachel Self, FNP-C. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$240

Largest payer

ABBVIE INC.

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

License & disciplinary context - Texas TMB 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~77K Texas medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Rachel Self, FNP-C. To verify Rachel Self, FNP-C's current license status, search the TMB public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

344
Total board actions, Texas 2023
Across 334 cases
4.47
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Texas statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
94 cases

TMB publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Texas disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Above average

Rachel Self, FNP-C - brand share 36.0%
Psychiatric/Mental Health Registered Nurse average

36% brand-name claims vs 64% generic, on 36 2024 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

36
Total Claims
$13K
Total Drug Cost
19
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
50.4
Total Day Supply
1,388
Brand vs Generic
36% brand / 64% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$13K
Generic Drug Cost
$321

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
68.1 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.29

Psychiatric/Mental Health Registered Nurse Overview

How Rachel Self, FNP-C fits within the Psychiatric/Mental Health Registered Nurse landscape nationally.

11,949
Psychiatric/Mental Health Registered Nurse Providers in US
54
States with Psychiatric/Mental Health Registered Nurse
830
Avg Claims per Provider

Rachel Self, FNP-C's 36 claims are below the specialty average of 830.

Nationwide Psychiatric/Mental Health Registered Nurse peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Self, both outside Texas so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (78.2 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2008)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Psychiatric/Mental Health Registered Nurse Providers in Texas

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Texas, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Self.

One of 279 Psychiatric/Mental Health Registered Nurse providers enrolled in Texas, 5 are shown here.

Compare Psychiatric/Mental Health Registered Nurse nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Rachel Self, FNP-C's specialty?
Rachel Self, FNP-C specializes in Psychiatric/Mental Health Registered Nurse and practices in Carrollton, Texas. Credentials: FNP-C.
How much does Rachel Self, FNP-C prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Rachel Self, FNP-C wrote 36 Medicare Part D claims totaling $13K in drug costs for 19 beneficiaries.
What is Rachel Self, FNP-C's Medicare quality score?
Rachel Self, FNP-C has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 78.2/100 (Quality: 82.7, Cost: 44.5). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Rachel Self, FNP-C located?
Rachel Self, FNP-C is located at 2133 GREENVIEW DR, Carrollton, TX, 75010. Phone: (469) 305-8057.
What is Rachel Self, FNP-C's NPI number?
Rachel Self, FNP-C's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1235395732, issued on 08/04/2008.
Does Rachel Self, FNP-C prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Rachel Self, FNP-C's prescribing is 36% brand-name and 64% generic drugs by claim count, with $13K in brand drug costs.
How many Psychiatric/Mental Health Registered Nurse providers are there in the US?
There are 11,949 Psychiatric/Mental Health Registered Nurse providers across 54 states in the US. The average Psychiatric/Mental Health Registered Nurse provider writes 830 Medicare Part D claims per year.
Does Rachel Self, FNP-C accept Medicare?
Rachel Self, FNP-C appears in CMS Medicare data with 36 Part D claims and 19 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Rachel Self, FNP-C's credentials?
Rachel Self, FNP-C's NPI is 1235395732 with credentials FNP-C. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.