2026 NPPES data Registered Nurse NPI 1528635893 FNP-BC
Verify on CMS →

Rachel Wilson, FNP-BC

Registered Nurse in Wellesley, Massachusetts. This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers — including 175,652 in Registered Nurse, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration — see our methodology.

Federal data — no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is — no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
21
Medicare Part D claims · 20 beneficiaries · Registered Nurse avg: 1K
MIPS score
84.9/100
▲ 2 pts above national avg 83.1 · Above neutral
Industry payments
$113.61
2 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Rachel Wilson, FNP-BC reported a CMS MIPS final score of 84.9/100 — above the 83.1 national average — and filed 21 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

84.9/100
MIPS score · +2 vs avg
21
Part D claims, 2023
$113.61
industry payments (Sunshine Act)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) — no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Rachel Wilson, FNP-BC's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023 — the federal quality measure

85 45th percentile higher than 45% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). This entry sits in this band. 90–100: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Rachel Wilson, FNP-BC sits

This provider among registered nurse peers

Across the 3,327 registered nurse providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Rachel Wilson, FNP-BC writes more Part D claims than 4% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 48% — placing this provider in the lower-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume — percentile in specialtyMIPS quality — percentilePart D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality — percentile: 98Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality — percentile: 98Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality — percentile: 60Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality — percentile: 90Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality — percentile: 58Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality — percentile: 67Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality — percentile: 72Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality — percentile: 73Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality — percentile: 63Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality — percentile: 75Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality — percentile: 12Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality — percentile: 3Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality — percentile: 93Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality — percentile: 88Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality — percentile: 70Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality — percentile: 78Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality — percentile: 80Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality — percentile: 15Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality — percentile: 27Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality — percentile: 95Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality — percentile: 68Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality — percentile: 42Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality — percentile: 17Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality — percentile: 5Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality — percentile: 77Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality — percentile: 47Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality — percentile: 62Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality — percentile: 8Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality — percentile: 55Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality — percentile: 43Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality — percentile: 22Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality — percentile: 43Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality — percentile: 28Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality — percentile: 97Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality — percentile: 2Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality — percentile: 10Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality — percentile: 25Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality — percentile: 30Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality — percentile: 53Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality — percentile: 80Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality — percentile: 7Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality — percentile: 87Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality — percentile: 50Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality — percentile: 57Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality — percentile: 48Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality — percentile: 65Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality — percentile: 18Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality — percentile: 23Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality — percentile: 0Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality — percentile: 83Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality — percentile: 20Rachel Wilson, FNP-BC — Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 4 · MIPS quality — percentile: 48
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one registered nurse peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Rachel Wilson, FNP-BC. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Rachel Wilson, FNP-BC?

Near national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 06/07/2021

NPI 1528635893

Primary specialty

Registered Nurse

High-volume

175,652 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

21 98% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,000

MIPS final score

84.9/100 1.8 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Massachusetts

How Registered Nurse compares to other specialties among Massachusetts providers

Massachusetts providers

Largest specialties in Massachusetts (% of in-state providers)

Mental Health Counselor — 8.3%Mental Health Counselor8.3%Clinical Social Worker — 7.8%Clinical Social Worker7.8%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program — 6.2%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program6.2%Behavior Technician — 4.9%Behavior Technician4.9%Counselor — 4.3%Counselor4.3%Internal Medicine Physician — 3.7%Internal Medicine Physician3.7%Registered Nurse — 2.8%Registered Nurse2.8%
Largest specialties in Massachusetts (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance — MIPS

Rachel Wilson, FNP-BC's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Registered Nurse national average

Near national average
MIPS Final Score
84.9/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Registered Nurse) — 84.9/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%84.9%
MIPS final score (Registered Nurse) — 84.9/100 vs national avg 83.1

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Rachel Wilson, FNP-BC appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Registered Nurse provider holding FNP-BC credentials at 188 LINDEN ST, Wellesley, MA, 02482, with a listed phone of (617) 876-5519. NPI 1528635893 was issued on 06/07/2021. Because NPPES data is self-reported by the provider and refreshed monthly, the address, phone, and specialty reflect what Wilson most recently submitted to CMS rather than a vetted directory listing, which is why patients should always confirm the practice is still at this location before scheduling.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 21 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 20 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $250 in drug spend. These figures capture only Medicare Part D — commercial insurance, Medicaid, and cash-pay prescriptions are not included, and any drug-beneficiary cell under 11 is suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 84.9/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 73.4, Cost 98.3), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Registered Nurse is a high-volume specialty nationwide, with 175,652 enrolled providers across 56 states and an average of 1,000 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline. Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist — always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

188 LINDEN ST
Wellesley, MA 02482

Provider Details

NPI 1528635893
Specialty Registered Nurse
Credentials FNP-BC
Gender Female
NPI Issued 06/07/2021

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

84.8818
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
73.4429
Quality
98.294
Cost

Reporting: Group practice

Industry payments received (2024) — CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Rachel Wilson, FNP-BC. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$114

Largest payer

Stryker Corporation

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias — they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

License & disciplinary context — Massachusetts BORIM 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only — NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~38K Massachusetts medical licensees in 2023 — they are NOT specific to Rachel Wilson, FNP-BC. To verify Rachel Wilson, FNP-BC's current license status, search the BORIM public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

80
Total board actions, Massachusetts 2023
Across 78 cases
2.11
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Massachusetts statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
29 cases

BORIM publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Massachusetts disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

21
Total Claims
$250
Total Drug Cost
20
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
21
Total Day Supply
239
Generic Drug Cost
$103

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
74.8 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
0.76
Age Distribution
<65: 0, 65-74: N/A, 75-84: N/A, 85+: N/A

Registered Nurse Overview

How Rachel Wilson, FNP-BC fits within the Registered Nurse landscape nationally.

175,652
Registered Nurse Providers in US
56
States with Registered Nurse
1,000
Avg Claims per Provider

Rachel Wilson, FNP-BC's 21 claims are below the specialty average of 1,000.

Nearby Registered Nurse Providers in Massachusetts

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Massachusetts, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Wilson.

Compare Registered Nurse nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry — providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Massachusetts medical board — federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Registered Nurse peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only — they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Rachel Wilson, FNP-BC's specialty?
Rachel Wilson, FNP-BC specializes in Registered Nurse and practices in Wellesley, Massachusetts. Credentials: FNP-BC.
How much does Rachel Wilson, FNP-BC prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Rachel Wilson, FNP-BC wrote 21 Medicare Part D claims totaling $250 in drug costs for 20 beneficiaries.
What is Rachel Wilson, FNP-BC's Medicare quality score?
Rachel Wilson, FNP-BC has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 84.9/100 (Quality: 73.4, Cost: 98.3). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Rachel Wilson, FNP-BC located?
Rachel Wilson, FNP-BC is located at 188 LINDEN ST, Wellesley, MA, 02482. Phone: (617) 876-5519.
What is Rachel Wilson, FNP-BC's NPI number?
Rachel Wilson, FNP-BC's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1528635893, issued on 06/07/2021.
How many Registered Nurse providers are there in the US?
There are 175,652 Registered Nurse providers across 56 states in the US. The average Registered Nurse provider writes 1,000 Medicare Part D claims per year.
Does Rachel Wilson, FNP-BC accept Medicare?
Rachel Wilson, FNP-BC appears in CMS Medicare data with 21 Part D claims and 20 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Rachel Wilson, FNP-BC's credentials?
Rachel Wilson, FNP-BC's NPI is 1528635893 with credentials FNP-BC. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) — 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.