2026 NPPES data Hematology & Oncology Physician NPI 1912968728 MD
Verify on CMS →

Rajneesh Nath, MD

Hematology & Oncology Physician in New Brunswick, New Jersey.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 11,232 in Hematology & Oncology Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
2K
Medicare Part D claims · 126 beneficiaries · Hematology & Oncology Physician avg: 847
MIPS score
81.5/100
▼ 2 pts below national avg 83.5 · Above neutral
Industry payments
$15.4K
13 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)

What the federal data shows

Rajneesh Nath, MD reported a CMS MIPS final score of 81.5/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 1,605 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

81.5/100
MIPS score · -2 vs avg
2K
Part D claims, 2023
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)
≥32nd
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1912968728 · Hematology & Oncology Physician

NPI-10 · ENUM-LEGACY · TAX-MID · MIPS-INLINE · RX-MID · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1912968728
  • ENUM-LEGACY 2006
  • TAX-MID 11K Hematology &
  • MIPS-INLINE 81.5/100
  • RX-MID 1,605
  • BOOK-THIN 323 in New Jersey
  • PHOTO-FINISH Shakeela Bahadur · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Rajneesh Nath, MD's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

82 ≥ 32nd percentile 32% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). This entry sits in this band. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Rajneesh Nath, MD sits

This provider among hematology & oncology physician peers

Across the 4,019 hematology & oncology physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Rajneesh Nath, MD writes more Part D claims than 83% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 33% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.148.372.496.6Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Rajneesh Nath, MD, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one hematology & oncology physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Rajneesh Nath, MD. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Rajneesh Nath, MD practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting + 1 hospital affiliation - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Rajneesh Nath, MD?

Near national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 03/31/2006

NPI 1912968728

Primary specialty

Hematology & Oncology Physician

Mid-sized

11,232 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

1,605 89% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 847

MIPS final score

81.5/100 2 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in New Jersey

How Hematology & Oncology Physician compares to other specialties among New Jersey providers

New Jersey providers
Mental Health Counselor6.2%Physical Therapist5.9%Clinical Social Worker5.5%Student in an Organized Heal…5.4%Pharmacist5%Internal Medicine Physician3.1%Hematology & Oncology Physic…0.2%
Largest specialties in New Jersey (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Rajneesh Nath, MD's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Hematology & Oncology Physician national average

Near national average
MIPS Final Score
81.5/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%81.5%
MIPS final score (Hematology & Oncology Physician) - 81.5/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

200 LITTLE ALBANY STREET, 9TH FLOOR
New Brunswick, NJ 08901

Provider Details

NPI 1912968728
Specialty Hematology & Oncology Physician
Credentials MD
Gender Male
NPI Issued 03/31/2006

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

81.4923
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
38.3075
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Rajneesh Nath, MD bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Rutgers Health-Rwj Scleroderma Program
New Brunswick, NJ

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Rajneesh Nath, MD. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$15.4K

Largest payer

ADC Therapeutics America, Inc.

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

1,605
Total Claims
$1.8M
Total Drug Cost
126
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
1,873
Total Day Supply
49,147
Generic Drug Cost
$488K
Opioid Claims
25 (1.6% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
244

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
69.1 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
3.76
Gender Split
40% female / 60% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Rajneesh Nath, MD prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Valacyclovir
Valacyclovir Hcl
159
Pantoprazole Sodium
131
Posaconazole
101
Venclexta
Venetoclax
99
Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim
Sulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim
78
Potassium Chloride
69
Levofloxacin
64
Vancomycin Hcl
56
Ondansetron Hcl
41
Prevymis
Letermovir
38

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Hematology & Oncology Physician Overview

How Rajneesh Nath, MD fits within the Hematology & Oncology Physician landscape nationally.

11,232
Hematology & Oncology Physician Providers in US
54
States with Hematology & Oncology Physician
847
Avg Claims per Provider

Rajneesh Nath, MD's 1,605 claims are above the specialty average of 847.

Nationwide Hematology & Oncology Physician peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Nath, both outside New Jersey so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (81.5 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2006)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Hematology & Oncology Physician Providers in New Jersey

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in New Jersey, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Nath.

One of 323 Hematology & Oncology Physician providers enrolled in New Jersey, 5 are shown here.

Compare Hematology & Oncology Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Rajneesh Nath, MD's specialty?
Rajneesh Nath, MD specializes in Hematology & Oncology Physician and practices in New Brunswick, New Jersey. Credentials: MD.
How much does Rajneesh Nath, MD prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Rajneesh Nath, MD wrote 1,605 Medicare Part D claims totaling $1.8M in drug costs for 126 beneficiaries.
What is Rajneesh Nath, MD's Medicare quality score?
Rajneesh Nath, MD has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 81.5/100, Cost: 38.3. The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Rajneesh Nath, MD located?
Rajneesh Nath, MD is located at 200 LITTLE ALBANY STREET, 9TH FLOOR, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901. Phone: (732) 235-2465.
What is Rajneesh Nath, MD's NPI number?
Rajneesh Nath, MD's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1912968728, issued on 03/31/2006.
Does Rajneesh Nath, MD prescribe opioids?
Yes, Rajneesh Nath, MD had 25 opioid claims in 2023 with an opioid prescribing rate of 1.6%.
How many Hematology & Oncology Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 11,232 Hematology & Oncology Physician providers across 54 states in the US. The average Hematology & Oncology Physician provider writes 847 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Rajneesh Nath, MD prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Rajneesh Nath, MD's most frequently prescribed drugs include Valacyclovir, Pantoprazole Sodium, Posaconazole. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Rajneesh Nath, MD accept Medicare?
Rajneesh Nath, MD appears in CMS Medicare data with 1,605 Part D claims and 126 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Rajneesh Nath, MD's credentials?
Rajneesh Nath, MD's NPI is 1912968728 with credentials MD. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.