2026 NPPES data Nurse Practitioner NPI 1194141317 FNP-C
Verify on CMS →

Rebecca Bender, FNP-C

Nurse Practitioner in Anderson, Missouri.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 87,227 in Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
7K
Medicare Part D claims · 419 beneficiaries · Nurse Practitioner avg: 1K
Generic prescribing
86%
generic claims · 13% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
64.7/100
▼ 18 pts below national avg 83.1 · Mid-tier
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Rebecca Bender, FNP-C reported a CMS MIPS final score of 64.7/100 - below the 83.1 national average - and filed 7,004 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

64.7/100
MIPS score · -18 vs avg
7K
Part D claims, 2023
86%
generic prescribing

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Rebecca Bender, FNP-C's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure

65 6th percentile higher than 6% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). This entry sits in this band. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Above this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Rebecca Bender, FNP-C sits

This provider among nurse practitioner peers

Across the 13,476 nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Rebecca Bender, FNP-C writes more Part D claims than 98% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 4% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.148.372.496.6Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePart D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Rebecca Bender, FNP-C-Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 4
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Rebecca Bender, FNP-C. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Rebecca Bender, FNP-C?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 03/12/2014

NPI 1194141317

Primary specialty

Nurse Practitioner

High-volume

87,227 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

7,004 vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,084

MIPS final score

64.7/100 18.4 pts vs avg

Mid-tier band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Missouri

How Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among Missouri providers

Missouri providers
Pharmacist - 4.8%Pharmacist4.8%Professional Counselor - 4.8%Professional Counselor4.8%Speech-Language Pathologist - 4.5%Speech-Language Pathologist4.5%Clinical Social Worker - 4.5%Clinical Social Worker4.5%Family Nurse Practitioner - 4.3%Family Nurse Practitioner4.3%Physical Therapist - 4%Physical Therapist4%Nurse Practitioner - 1.4%Nurse Practitioner1.4%
Largest specialties in Missouri (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Rebecca Bender, FNP-C's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Nurse Practitioner national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
64.7/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Nurse Practitioner) - 64.7/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%64.7%
MIPS final score (Nurse Practitioner) - 64.7/100 vs national avg 83.1
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Rebecca Bender, FNP-C appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Nurse Practitioner provider holding FNP-C credentials at 510 PARK STREET, Anderson, MO, 64831, with a listed phone of (417) 845-0545. NPI 1194141317 was issued on 03/12/2014.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 7,004 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 419 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $645K in drug spend, split 13% brand-name and 86% generic by claim count, with an opioid prescribing rate of 1.0%. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 64.7/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 58.6, Cost 58.5), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Nurse Practitioner is a high-volume specialty nationwide, with 87,227 enrolled providers across 56 states and an average of 1,084 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline.

Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist, always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

510 PARK STREET
Anderson, MO 64831

Provider Details

NPI 1194141317
Specialty Nurse Practitioner
Credentials FNP-C
Gender Female
NPI Issued 03/12/2014

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

64.7437
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
58.555
Quality
58.4614
Cost

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Rebecca Bender, FNP-C bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Freeman-Oak Hill Health System
Seneca, MO

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Typical

Rebecca Bender, FNP-C - brand share 13.0%
Nurse Practitioner average

13% brand-name claims vs 86% generic, on 7,004 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

7,004
Total Claims
$645K
Total Drug Cost
419
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
12,295
Total Day Supply
354,808
Brand vs Generic
13% brand / 86% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$544K
Generic Drug Cost
$98K
Opioid Claims
73 (1.0% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
244

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
70.9 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.11
Gender Split
62% female / 38% male
Age Distribution
<65: 82, 65-74: 187, 75-84: 111, 85+: 39

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Rebecca Bender, FNP-C prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Amlodipine Besylate
319
Lisinopril
287
Atorvastatin Calcium
258
Levothyroxine Sodium
246
Losartan Potassium
231
Gabapentin
204
Metformin Hcl
183
Pantoprazole Sodium
178
Albuterol Sulfate Hfa
Albuterol Sulfate
138
Rosuvastatin Calcium
127

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Rebecca Bender, FNP-C fits within the Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

87,227
Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
56
States with Nurse Practitioner
1,084
Avg Claims per Provider

Rebecca Bender, FNP-C's 7,004 claims are above the specialty average of 1,084.

Nearby Nurse Practitioner Providers in Missouri

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Missouri, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Bender.

Compare Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry, providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Missouri medical board, federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Nurse Practitioner peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only, they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Rebecca Bender, FNP-C's specialty?
Rebecca Bender, FNP-C specializes in Nurse Practitioner and practices in Anderson, Missouri. Credentials: FNP-C.
How much does Rebecca Bender, FNP-C prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Rebecca Bender, FNP-C wrote 7,004 Medicare Part D claims totaling $645K in drug costs for 419 beneficiaries.
What is Rebecca Bender, FNP-C's Medicare quality score?
Rebecca Bender, FNP-C has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 64.7/100 (Quality: 58.6, Cost: 58.5). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Rebecca Bender, FNP-C located?
Rebecca Bender, FNP-C is located at 510 PARK STREET, Anderson, MO, 64831. Phone: (417) 845-0545.
What is Rebecca Bender, FNP-C's NPI number?
Rebecca Bender, FNP-C's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1194141317, issued on 03/12/2014.
Does Rebecca Bender, FNP-C prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Rebecca Bender, FNP-C's prescribing is 13% brand-name and 86% generic drugs by claim count, with $544K in brand drug costs.
Does Rebecca Bender, FNP-C prescribe opioids?
Yes, Rebecca Bender, FNP-C had 73 opioid claims in 2023 with an opioid prescribing rate of 1.0%.
How many Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US?
There are 87,227 Nurse Practitioner providers across 56 states in the US. The average Nurse Practitioner provider writes 1,084 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Rebecca Bender, FNP-C prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Rebecca Bender, FNP-C's most frequently prescribed drugs include Amlodipine Besylate, Lisinopril, Atorvastatin Calcium. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Rebecca Bender, FNP-C accept Medicare?
Rebecca Bender, FNP-C appears in CMS Medicare data with 7,004 Part D claims and 419 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Rebecca Bender, FNP-C's credentials?
Rebecca Bender, FNP-C's NPI is 1194141317 with credentials FNP-C. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.