2026 NPPES data Hematology & Oncology Physician NPI 1073563516 MD
Verify on CMS →

Richard Frame, MD

Hematology & Oncology Physician in Salt Lake City, Utah.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 11,530 in Hematology & Oncology Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
78
Medicare Part D claims · 46 beneficiaries · Hematology & Oncology Physician avg: 885
Generic prescribing
86%
generic claims · 14% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
73.9/100
▼ 10 pts below national avg 83.5 · Mid-tier
Industry payments
$106.73
5 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)

What the federal data shows

Richard Frame, MD reported a CMS MIPS final score of 73.9/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 78 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

73.9/100
MIPS score · -10 vs avg
78
Part D claims, 2024
86%
generic prescribing
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Richard Frame, MD

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1073563516), first enumerated 05/12/2006.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 78 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 73.9/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Board certification signal

    Heuristic suggests board-certified status based on ABMS-eligible specialty taxonomy plus active CMS participation signals — not a direct ABMS verification.

    Source: NUCC taxonomy + CMS participation heuristic

  • Reported

    Industry payment transparency

    $106.73 in reported industry payments (5 transfers) in 2024 under the federal Sunshine Act — disclosed transfers of value, not a quality rating.

    Source: CMS Open Payments

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

Compare Frame with other Hematology & Oncology Physician providers

Same primary specialty, same federal CMS NPPES roster.

Also enrolled in Utah

Other specialties in Salt Lake City: Case Manager/Care Coordinator (1,971) · Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program (1,718) · Community Health Worker (1,661) · Behavior Technician (1,240)

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1073563516 · Hematology & Oncology Physician

NPI-10 · ENUM-LEGACY · TAX-MID · MIPS-BELOW · RX-TRACE · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1073563516
  • ENUM-LEGACY 2006
  • TAX-MID 12K Hematology &
  • MIPS-BELOW 73.9/100
  • RX-TRACE 78
  • BOOK-THIN 80 in Utah
  • PHOTO-FINISH Neil Schacht, MD · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Richard Frame, MD's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

74 ≥ 11th percentile 11% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). This entry sits in this band. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Richard Frame, MD sits

This provider among hematology & oncology physician peers

Across the 4,019 hematology & oncology physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Richard Frame, MD writes more Part D claims than 7% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 11% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.148.372.496.6Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Richard Frame, MD, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 11
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one hematology & oncology physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Richard Frame, MD. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Richard Frame, MD practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Richard Frame, MD?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 05/12/2006

NPI 1073563516

Primary specialty

Hematology & Oncology Physician

Mid-sized

11,530 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

78 91% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 885

MIPS final score

73.9/100 9.6 pts vs avg

Mid-tier band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Utah

How Hematology & Oncology Physician compares to other specialties among Utah providers

Utah providers
Behavior Technician13%Clinical Social Worker6.3%Community Health Worker5.9%Case Manager/Care Coordinator5.7%Counselor4.7%Student in an Organized Heal…4.5%Hematology & Oncology Physic…0.1%
Largest specialties in Utah (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Richard Frame, MD's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Hematology & Oncology Physician national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
73.9/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%73.9%
MIPS final score (Hematology & Oncology Physician) - 73.9/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

3838 S 700 E
Salt Lake City, UT 84106

Provider Details

NPI 1073563516
Specialty Hematology & Oncology Physician
Credentials MD
Gender Male
NPI Issued 05/12/2006

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

73.9058
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
61.008
Quality
50.3317
Cost
91
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Richard Frame, MD. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$107

Largest payer

Daiichi Sankyo Inc.

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Typical

Richard Frame, MD - brand share 14.0%
Hematology & Oncology Physician average

14% brand-name claims vs 86% generic, on 78 2024 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

78
Total Claims
$109K
Total Drug Cost
46
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
127.667
Total Day Supply
3,233
Brand vs Generic
14% brand / 86% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$108K
Generic Drug Cost
$980

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
72.0 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
2.22
Gender Split
65% female / 35% male

Hematology & Oncology Physician Overview

How Richard Frame, MD fits within the Hematology & Oncology Physician landscape nationally.

11,530
Hematology & Oncology Physician Providers in US
54
States with Hematology & Oncology Physician
885
Avg Claims per Provider

Richard Frame, MD's 78 claims are below the specialty average of 885.

Nationwide Hematology & Oncology Physician peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Frame, both outside Utah so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (73.9 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2006)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Hematology & Oncology Physician Providers in Utah

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Utah, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Frame.

One of 80 Hematology & Oncology Physician providers enrolled in Utah, 11 are shown on this page.

Compare Hematology & Oncology Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Richard Frame, MD's specialty?
Richard Frame, MD specializes in Hematology & Oncology Physician and practices in Salt Lake City, Utah. Credentials: MD.
How much does Richard Frame, MD prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Richard Frame, MD wrote 78 Medicare Part D claims totaling $109K in drug costs for 46 beneficiaries.
What is Richard Frame, MD's Medicare quality score?
Richard Frame, MD has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 73.9/100 (Quality: 61, Cost: 50.3). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Richard Frame, MD located?
Richard Frame, MD is located at 3838 S 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84106. Phone: (801) 269-0231.
What is Richard Frame, MD's NPI number?
Richard Frame, MD's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1073563516, issued on 05/12/2006.
Does Richard Frame, MD prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Richard Frame, MD's prescribing is 14% brand-name and 86% generic drugs by claim count, with $108K in brand drug costs.
How many Hematology & Oncology Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 11,530 Hematology & Oncology Physician providers across 54 states in the US. The average Hematology & Oncology Physician provider writes 885 Medicare Part D claims per year.
Does Richard Frame, MD accept Medicare?
Richard Frame, MD appears in CMS Medicare data with 78 Part D claims and 46 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Richard Frame, MD's credentials?
Richard Frame, MD's NPI is 1073563516 with credentials MD. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.