2026 NPPES data Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician NPI 1407833932 MD
Verify on CMS →

Richard Kim, MD

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician in Maywood, New Jersey.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 2,352 in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
278
Medicare Part D claims · 115 beneficiaries · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician avg: 86
MIPS score
0/100
▼ 83 pts below national avg 83.1 · Penalty band
Industry payments
$54.52
3 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Richard Kim, MD reported a CMS MIPS final score of 0/100 - below the 83.1 national average - and filed 278 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

0/100
MIPS score · -83 vs avg
278
Part D claims, 2023
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Richard Kim, MD's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure

0 0th percentile higher than 0% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). This entry sits in this band. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Above this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Above this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Above this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Above this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Above this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Above this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Richard Kim, MD sits

This provider among plastic and reconstructive surgery physician peers

Across the 276 plastic and reconstructive surgery physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Richard Kim, MD writes more Part D claims than 92% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 0% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.448.873.297.7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePart D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Richard Kim, MD-Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one plastic and reconstructive surgery physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Richard Kim, MD. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Richard Kim, MD practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Richard Kim, MD?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 12/27/2005

NPI 1407833932

Primary specialty

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician

Niche

2,352 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

278 223% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 86

MIPS final score

0/100 83.1 pts vs avg

Penalty band band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in New Jersey

How Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician compares to other specialties among New Jersey providers

New Jersey providers
Mental Health Counselor - 6.2%Mental Health Counselor6.2%Physical Therapist - 5.9%Physical Therapist5.9%Clinical Social Worker - 5.5%Clinical Social Worker5.5%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program - 5.4%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program5.4%Pharmacist - 5%Pharmacist5%Internal Medicine Physician - 3.1%Internal Medicine Physician3.1%Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician - 0%Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician0%
Largest specialties in New Jersey (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Richard Kim, MD's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
0/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician) - 0/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%0%
MIPS final score (Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician) - 0/100 vs national avg 83.1
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Richard Kim, MD appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician provider holding MD credentials at 113 W ESSEX ST STE 203, Maywood, NJ, 07607, with a listed phone of (201) 880-7766. NPI 1407833932 was issued on 12/27/2005.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 278 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 115 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $2K in drug spend, with an opioid prescribing rate of 32.4%. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 0/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 0), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician is a narrow specialty nationwide, with 2,352 enrolled providers across 54 states and an average of 86 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline.

Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist, always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

113 W ESSEX ST STE 203
Maywood, NJ 07607

Provider Details

NPI 1407833932
Specialty Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician
Credentials MD
Gender Male
NPI Issued 12/27/2005

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

0
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
0
Quality

Reporting: Individual

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Richard Kim, MD. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$55

Largest payer

Medtronic, Inc.

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

278
Total Claims
$2K
Total Drug Cost
115
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
287
Total Day Supply
2,905
Generic Drug Cost
$2K
Opioid Claims
90 (32.4% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
65

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
72.6 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.06
Gender Split
63% female / 37% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Richard Kim, MD prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Ibuprofen
93
Cephalexin
56
Acetaminophen-Codeine
Acetaminophen With Codeine
55
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen
Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen
17
Methylprednisolone
16
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen
Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen
11

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician Overview

How Richard Kim, MD fits within the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician landscape nationally.

2,352
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician Providers in US
54
States with Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician
86
Avg Claims per Provider

Richard Kim, MD's 278 claims are above the specialty average of 86.

Nearby Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician Providers in New Jersey

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in New Jersey, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Kim.

Compare Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry, providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the New Jersey medical board, federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only, they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Richard Kim, MD's specialty?
Richard Kim, MD specializes in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician and practices in Maywood, New Jersey. Credentials: MD.
How much does Richard Kim, MD prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Richard Kim, MD wrote 278 Medicare Part D claims totaling $2K in drug costs for 115 beneficiaries.
What is Richard Kim, MD's Medicare quality score?
Richard Kim, MD has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 0/100 (Quality: 0). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Richard Kim, MD located?
Richard Kim, MD is located at 113 W ESSEX ST STE 203, Maywood, NJ, 07607. Phone: (201) 880-7766.
What is Richard Kim, MD's NPI number?
Richard Kim, MD's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1407833932, issued on 12/27/2005.
Does Richard Kim, MD prescribe opioids?
Yes, Richard Kim, MD had 90 opioid claims in 2023 with an opioid prescribing rate of 32.4%.
How many Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 2,352 Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician providers across 54 states in the US. The average Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Physician provider writes 86 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Richard Kim, MD prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Richard Kim, MD's most frequently prescribed drugs include Ibuprofen, Cephalexin, Acetaminophen-Codeine. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Richard Kim, MD accept Medicare?
Richard Kim, MD appears in CMS Medicare data with 278 Part D claims and 115 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Richard Kim, MD's credentials?
Richard Kim, MD's NPI is 1407833932 with credentials MD. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.