2026 NPPES data Primary Care Nurse Practitioner NPI 1588267488
Verify on CMS →

Richard Sutherland

Primary Care Nurse Practitioner in Martinsburg, West Virginia.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 10,597 in Primary Care Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
2K
Medicare Part D claims · 642 beneficiaries · Primary Care Nurse Practitioner avg: 1K
Generic prescribing
92%
generic claims · 8% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
91.4/100
▲ 8 pts above national avg 83.5 · Exceptional
Industry payments
$1.0K
41 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)

What the federal data shows

Richard Sutherland reported a CMS MIPS final score of 91.4/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 1,820 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

91.4/100
MIPS score · +8 vs avg
2K
Part D claims, 2024
92%
generic prescribing
$1.0K
industry payments (Sunshine Act)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Richard Sutherland

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1588267488), first enumerated 11/21/2020.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 1,820 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 91.4/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Hospital affiliations

    1 CMS Care Compare hospital affiliation on record — practice footprint from the Doctors and Clinicians file.

    Source: CMS Care Compare

  • Reported

    Industry payment transparency

    $1.0K in reported industry payments (41 transfers) in 2024 under the federal Sunshine Act — disclosed transfers of value, not a quality rating.

    Source: CMS Open Payments

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1588267488 · Primary Care Nurse Practitioner

NPI-10 · ENUM-RECENT · TAX-MID · MIPS-ABOVE · RX-MID · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1588267488
  • ENUM-RECENT 2020
  • TAX-MID 11K Primary Care
  • MIPS-ABOVE 91.4/100
  • RX-MID 1,820
  • BOOK-THIN 55 in West Virginia
  • PHOTO-FINISH Ashley Brisebois · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Richard Sutherland's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

91 ≥ 61st percentile 61% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Below this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Richard Sutherland sits

This provider among primary care nurse practitioner peers

Across the 926 primary care nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Richard Sutherland writes more Part D claims than 73% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 63% - placing this provider in the high-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Richard Sutherland, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one primary care nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Richard Sutherland. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Richard Sutherland?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 11/21/2020

NPI 1588267488

Primary specialty

Primary Care Nurse Practitioner

Mid-sized

10,597 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

1,820 24% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,471

MIPS final score

91.4/100 7.9 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in West Virginia

How Primary Care Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among West Virginia providers

West Virginia providers
Personal Care Attendant38.6%Home Health Aide8.2%Community Health Worker5.3%Homemaker3.1%Student in an Organized Heal…2.9%Pharmacist2.9%Primary Care Nurse Practitio…0.1%
Largest specialties in West Virginia (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Richard Sutherland's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Primary Care Nurse Practitioner national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
91.4/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%91.4%
MIPS final score (Primary Care Nurse Practitioner) - 91.4/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

1000 SUSHRUTA DR
Martinsburg, WV 25401

Provider Details

NPI 1588267488
Specialty Primary Care Nurse Practitioner
Gender Male
NPI Issued 11/21/2020

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

91.4381
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
84.9783
Quality
99
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Individual

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Richard Sutherland bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Center For Dermatology - Erik B Hurst
Martinsburg, WV

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Richard Sutherland. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$1.0K

Largest payer

Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc.

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Generic-heavy

Richard Sutherland - brand share 8.0%
Primary Care Nurse Practitioner average

8% brand-name claims vs 92% generic, on 1,820 2024 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

1,820
Total Claims
$547K
Total Drug Cost
642
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
2,154.1
Total Day Supply
58,382
Brand vs Generic
8% brand / 92% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$502K
Generic Drug Cost
$45K
Antibiotic Claims
124

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
74.2 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.12
Gender Split
43% female / 57% male
Age Distribution
<65: 46, 65-74: 265, 75-84: 262, 85+: 69

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Richard Sutherland prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Triamcinolone Acetonide
354
Ketoconazole
307
Hydrocortisone
256
Clobetasol Propionate
175
Doxycycline Hyclate
67
Methotrexate
Methotrexate Sodium
54
Mupirocin
53
Tacrolimus
50
Ciclopirox
Ciclopirox Olamine
48
Fluorouracil
44

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Primary Care Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Richard Sutherland fits within the Primary Care Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

10,597
Primary Care Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
54
States with Primary Care Nurse Practitioner
1,471
Avg Claims per Provider

Richard Sutherland's 1,820 claims are above the specialty average of 1,471.

Nationwide Primary Care Nurse Practitioner peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Sutherland, both outside West Virginia so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (91.4 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2020)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Primary Care Nurse Practitioner Providers in West Virginia

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in West Virginia, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Sutherland.

One of 55 Primary Care Nurse Practitioner providers enrolled in West Virginia, 5 are shown here.

Compare Primary Care Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Richard Sutherland's specialty?
Richard Sutherland specializes in Primary Care Nurse Practitioner and practices in Martinsburg, West Virginia.
How much does Richard Sutherland prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Richard Sutherland wrote 1,820 Medicare Part D claims totaling $547K in drug costs for 642 beneficiaries.
What is Richard Sutherland's Medicare quality score?
Richard Sutherland has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 91.4/100 (Quality: 85). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Richard Sutherland located?
Richard Sutherland is located at 1000 SUSHRUTA DR, Martinsburg, WV, 25401. Phone: (304) 263-3933.
What is Richard Sutherland's NPI number?
Richard Sutherland's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1588267488, issued on 11/21/2020.
Does Richard Sutherland prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Richard Sutherland's prescribing is 8% brand-name and 92% generic drugs by claim count, with $502K in brand drug costs.
How many Primary Care Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US?
There are 10,597 Primary Care Nurse Practitioner providers across 54 states in the US. The average Primary Care Nurse Practitioner provider writes 1,471 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Richard Sutherland prescribe most often?
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Richard Sutherland's most frequently prescribed drugs include Triamcinolone Acetonide, Ketoconazole, Hydrocortisone. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Richard Sutherland accept Medicare?
Richard Sutherland appears in CMS Medicare data with 1,820 Part D claims and 642 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Richard Sutherland's credentials?
Richard Sutherland's NPI is 1588267488. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.