2026 NPPES data Physician Assistant NPI 1235804584 PA-C
Verify on CMS →

Ruth Keeling, PA-C

Physician Assistant in New Windsor, New York.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 150,974 in Physician Assistant, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
952
Medicare Part D claims · 409 beneficiaries · Physician Assistant avg: 790
Generic prescribing
97%
generic claims · 3% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
80.8/100
▼ 3 pts below national avg 83.5 · Above neutral
Industry payments
$540.35
23 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)

What the federal data shows

Ruth Keeling, PA-C reported a CMS MIPS final score of 80.8/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 952 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

80.8/100
MIPS score · -3 vs avg
952
Part D claims, 2023
97%
generic prescribing
$540.35
industry payments (Sunshine Act)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1235804584 · Physician Assistant

NPI-10 · ENUM-RECENT · TAX-MEGA · MIPS-INLINE · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-MID · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1235804584
  • ENUM-RECENT 2021
  • TAX-MEGA 151K Physician Assistant
  • MIPS-INLINE 80.8/100
  • RX-LIGHT 952
  • BOOK-MID 14,599 in New York
  • PHOTO-FINISH Robyn De Stefano · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Ruth Keeling, PA-C's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

81 ≥ 30th percentile 30% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). This entry sits in this band. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Ruth Keeling, PA-C sits

This provider among physician assistant peers

Across the 26,497 physician assistant providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Ruth Keeling, PA-C writes more Part D claims than 82% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 30% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Ruth Keeling, PA-C, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one physician assistant peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Ruth Keeling, PA-C. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Ruth Keeling, PA-C?

Near national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 08/10/2021

NPI 1235804584

Primary specialty

Physician Assistant

High-volume

150,974 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

952 21% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 790

MIPS final score

80.8/100 2.7 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in New York

How Physician Assistant compares to other specialties among New York providers

New York providers
Student in an Organized Heal…7.8%Registered Nurse5.2%Clinical Social Worker4.9%Social Worker4.5%Speech-Language Pathologist4.5%Licensed Practical Nurse4.3%Physician Assistant2.7%
Largest specialties in New York (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Ruth Keeling, PA-C's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Physician Assistant national average

Near national average
MIPS Final Score
80.8/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%80.8%
MIPS final score (Physician Assistant) - 80.8/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

4 CROTTY LN UPPR LEVEL
New Windsor, NY 12553

Provider Details

NPI 1235804584
Specialty Physician Assistant
Credentials PA-C
Gender Female
NPI Issued 08/10/2021

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

80.7875
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
74.6194
Quality
63.0055
Cost
98
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Ruth Keeling, PA-C bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Albany Ent And Allergy Services PC
Albany, NY
Ent And Allergy Associates LLP
Yonkers, NY

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Ruth Keeling, PA-C. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$540

Largest payer

GlaxoSmithKline, LLC.

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

License & disciplinary context - New York NYSBPMC 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~100K New York medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Ruth Keeling, PA-C. To verify Ruth Keeling, PA-C's current license status, search the NYSBPMC public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

312
Total board actions, New York 2023
Across 302 cases
3.12
Actions per 1,000 licensees
New York statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
89 cases

NYSBPMC publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the New York disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Generic-heavy

Ruth Keeling, PA-C - brand share 3.0%
Physician Assistant average

3% brand-name claims vs 97% generic, on 952 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

952
Total Claims
$34K
Total Drug Cost
409
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
1,784
Total Day Supply
47,611
Brand vs Generic
3% brand / 97% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$7K
Generic Drug Cost
$27K
Antibiotic Claims
84

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
71.8 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.11
Gender Split
60% female / 40% male
Age Distribution
<65: 51, 65-74: 207, 75-84: 114, 85+: 37

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Ruth Keeling, PA-C prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Famotidine
182
Ipratropium Bromide
114
Fluticasone Propionate
86
Omeprazole
75
Mupirocin
60
Azelastine Hcl
46
Montelukast Sodium
46
Levocetirizine Dihydrochloride
38
Prednisone
37
Doxycycline Hyclate
35

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Physician Assistant Overview

How Ruth Keeling, PA-C fits within the Physician Assistant landscape nationally.

150,974
Physician Assistant Providers in US
56
States with Physician Assistant
790
Avg Claims per Provider

Ruth Keeling, PA-C's 952 claims are above the specialty average of 790.

Nationwide Physician Assistant peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Keeling, both outside New York so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (80.8 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2021)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Physician Assistant Providers in New York

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in New York, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Keeling.

One of 14,599 Physician Assistant providers enrolled in New York, 5 are shown here.

Compare Physician Assistant nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Ruth Keeling, PA-C's specialty?
Ruth Keeling, PA-C specializes in Physician Assistant and practices in New Windsor, New York. Credentials: PA-C.
How much does Ruth Keeling, PA-C prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Ruth Keeling, PA-C wrote 952 Medicare Part D claims totaling $34K in drug costs for 409 beneficiaries.
What is Ruth Keeling, PA-C's Medicare quality score?
Ruth Keeling, PA-C has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 80.8/100 (Quality: 74.6, Cost: 63). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Ruth Keeling, PA-C located?
Ruth Keeling, PA-C is located at 4 CROTTY LN UPPR LEVEL, New Windsor, NY, 12553. Phone: (845) 562-0760.
What is Ruth Keeling, PA-C's NPI number?
Ruth Keeling, PA-C's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1235804584, issued on 08/10/2021.
Does Ruth Keeling, PA-C prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Ruth Keeling, PA-C's prescribing is 3% brand-name and 97% generic drugs by claim count, with $7K in brand drug costs.
How many Physician Assistant providers are there in the US?
There are 150,974 Physician Assistant providers across 56 states in the US. The average Physician Assistant provider writes 790 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Ruth Keeling, PA-C prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Ruth Keeling, PA-C's most frequently prescribed drugs include Famotidine, Ipratropium Bromide, Fluticasone Propionate. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Ruth Keeling, PA-C accept Medicare?
Ruth Keeling, PA-C appears in CMS Medicare data with 952 Part D claims and 409 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Ruth Keeling, PA-C's credentials?
Ruth Keeling, PA-C's NPI is 1235804584 with credentials PA-C. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.