2026 NPPES data Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program NPI 1205198082 MD
Verify on CMS →

Ryan Sivertson, MD

Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program in Sioux Falls, South Dakota.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 331,274 in Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
115
Medicare Part D claims · 64 beneficiaries · Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program avg: 459
MIPS score
76.7/100
▼ 7 pts below national avg 83.5 · Above neutral

What the federal data shows

Ryan Sivertson, MD reported a CMS MIPS final score of 76.7/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 115 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

76.7/100
MIPS score · -7 vs avg
115
Part D claims, 2023
≥17th
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Ryan Sivertson, MD

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1205198082), first enumerated 06/08/2012.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 115 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 76.7/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1205198082 · Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program

NPI-10 · ENUM-MID · TAX-MEGA · MIPS-BELOW · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1205198082
  • ENUM-MID 2012
  • TAX-MEGA 331K Student in
  • MIPS-BELOW 76.7/100
  • RX-LIGHT 115
  • BOOK-THIN 457 in South Dakota
  • PHOTO-FINISH Jenny Hoffmann · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Ryan Sivertson, MD's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

77 ≥ 17th percentile 17% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). This entry sits in this band. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Ryan Sivertson, MD sits

This provider among student in an organized health care education/training program peers

Across the 12,177 student in an organized health care education/training program providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Ryan Sivertson, MD writes more Part D claims than 29% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 15% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 98Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 98Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Ryan Sivertson, MD, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 29 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one student in an organized health care education/training program peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Ryan Sivertson, MD. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Ryan Sivertson, MD?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 06/08/2012

NPI 1205198082

Primary specialty

Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program

High-volume

331,274 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

115 75% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 459

MIPS final score

76.7/100 6.8 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in South Dakota

How Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program compares to other specialties among South Dakota providers

South Dakota providers
Physical Therapist5.6%Pharmacist5.5%Registered Nurse4.8%Family Nurse Practitioner4.7%Mental Health Counselor4%Physician Assistant3.7%Student in an Organized Heal…2.7%
Largest specialties in South Dakota (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Ryan Sivertson, MD's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
76.7/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%76.7%
MIPS final score (Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program) - 76.7/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

1305 W 18TH ST
Sioux Falls, SD 57105

Provider Details

NPI 1205198082
Specialty Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program
Credentials MD
Gender Male
NPI Issued 06/08/2012

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

76.6912
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
78.5693
Quality
44.5681
Cost
99
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

115
Total Claims
$2K
Total Drug Cost
64
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
115
Total Day Supply
1,085
Generic Drug Cost
$2K
Antibiotic Claims
42

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
69.2 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.84
Gender Split
73% female / 27% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

Drug Claims
Cephalexin
20
Sodium Bicarbonate
18

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program Overview

How Ryan Sivertson, MD fits within the Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program landscape nationally.

331,274
Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program Providers in US
55
States with Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program
459
Avg Claims per Provider

Ryan Sivertson, MD's 115 claims are below the specialty average of 459.

Nationwide Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Sivertson, both outside South Dakota so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (76.7 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2012)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program Providers in South Dakota

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in South Dakota, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Sivertson.

One of 457 Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program providers enrolled in South Dakota, 5 are shown here.

Compare Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Ryan Sivertson, MD's specialty?
Ryan Sivertson, MD specializes in Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program and practices in Sioux Falls, South Dakota. Credentials: MD.
How much does Ryan Sivertson, MD prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Ryan Sivertson, MD wrote 115 Medicare Part D claims totaling $2K in drug costs for 64 beneficiaries.
What is Ryan Sivertson, MD's Medicare quality score?
Ryan Sivertson, MD has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 76.7/100 (Quality: 78.6, Cost: 44.6). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Ryan Sivertson, MD located?
Ryan Sivertson, MD is located at 1305 W 18TH ST, Sioux Falls, SD, 57105. Phone: (605) 333-1000.
What is Ryan Sivertson, MD's NPI number?
Ryan Sivertson, MD's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1205198082, issued on 06/08/2012.
How many Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program providers are there in the US?
There are 331,274 Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program providers across 55 states in the US. The average Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program provider writes 459 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Ryan Sivertson, MD prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Ryan Sivertson, MD's most frequently prescribed drugs include Cephalexin, Sodium Bicarbonate. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Ryan Sivertson, MD accept Medicare?
Ryan Sivertson, MD appears in CMS Medicare data with 115 Part D claims and 64 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Ryan Sivertson, MD's credentials?
Ryan Sivertson, MD's NPI is 1205198082 with credentials MD. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.