PlainDoctor

2026 NPPES data Surgical Oncology Physician NPI 1821144635 MD, PHD, MPH, FACS
Verify on CMS →

Sabha Ganai, MD, PHD, MPH, FACS

Surgical Oncology Physician in Fargo, North Dakota.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 1,460 in Surgical Oncology Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
20
Medicare Part D claims · Surgical Oncology Physician avg: 99
MIPS score
83/100
▼ 1 pts below national avg 83.5 · Above neutral
Verify NPI on CMS Methodology
Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

What the federal data shows

Sabha Ganai, MD, PHD, MPH, FACS reported a CMS MIPS final score of 83/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 20 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

83/100
MIPS score · -1 vs avg
20
Part D claims, 2024
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)
≥36th
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Sabha Ganai, MD, PHD, MPH, FACS

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1821144635), first enumerated 01/25/2007.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 20 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 83/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Board certification signal

    Heuristic suggests board-certified status based on ABMS-eligible specialty taxonomy plus active CMS participation signals — not a direct ABMS verification.

    Source: NUCC taxonomy + CMS participation heuristic

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1821144635 · Surgical Oncology Physician

NPI-10 · ENUM-MID · TAX-NARROW · MIPS-INLINE · RX-TRACE · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1821144635
  • ENUM-MID 2007
  • TAX-NARROW 1,460
  • MIPS-INLINE 83/100
  • RX-TRACE 20
  • BOOK-THIN 4 in North Dakota
  • PHOTO-FINISH Kahyun Yoon-Flannery · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Sabha Ganai, MD, PHD, MPH, FACS's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

83 ≥ 36th percentile 36% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). This entry sits in this band. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Sabha Ganai, MD, PHD, MPH, FACS sits

This provider among surgical oncology physician peers

Across the 408 surgical oncology physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Sabha Ganai, MD, PHD, MPH, FACS writes more Part D claims than 17% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 40% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.949.974.899.8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Sabha Ganai, MD, PHD, MPH, FACS, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one surgical oncology physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Sabha Ganai, MD, PHD, MPH, FACS. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

✓
Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Sabha Ganai, MD, PHD, MPH, FACS practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Sabha Ganai, MD, PHD, MPH, FACS?

Near national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 01/25/2007

NPI 1821144635

Primary specialty

Surgical Oncology Physician

Niche

1,460 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

20 80% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 99

MIPS final score

83/100 0.5 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in North Dakota

How Surgical Oncology Physician compares to other specialties among North Dakota providers

North Dakota providers
Personal Care Attendant8.1%Case Manager/Care Coordinator6.4%Physical Therapist4.6%Speech-Language Pathologist4.5%Registered Nurse4.1%Social Worker3.9%Surgical Oncology Physician0%
Largest specialties in North Dakota (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Sabha Ganai, MD, PHD, MPH, FACS's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Surgical Oncology Physician national average

Near national average
MIPS Final Score
83/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%83%
MIPS final score (Surgical Oncology Physician) - 83/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

737 BROADWAY N
Fargo, ND 58102
(701) 234-2000

Provider Details

NPI 1821144635
Specialty Surgical Oncology Physician
Credentials MD, PHD, MPH, FACS
Gender Female
NPI Issued 01/25/2007

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

82.9973
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
87.0681
Quality
57.0897
Cost
99
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

20
Total Claims
$2K
Total Drug Cost
N/A
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
28.6
Total Day Supply
637
Generic Drug Cost
$263

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
73.2 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
4.60
More Surgical Oncology Physician in ND → All providers in North Dakota → Compare specialties →

Surgical Oncology Physician Overview

How Sabha Ganai, MD, PHD, MPH, FACS fits within the Surgical Oncology Physician landscape nationally.

1,460
Surgical Oncology Physician Providers in US
51
States with Surgical Oncology Physician
99
Avg Claims per Provider

Sabha Ganai, MD, PHD, MPH, FACS's 20 claims are below the specialty average of 99.

Nationwide Surgical Oncology Physician peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Ganai, both outside North Dakota so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (83 here).

Kahyun Yoon-Flannery 83 NJ David Bertsch 82.9 PA Rebekah Macfie 82.9 PA Rhiana Menen 83.3 ID

Same NPPES enumeration year (2007)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Gina Modena Akron, OH Kristi Funk Beverly Hills, CA Bret Schipper Hartford, CT Betsy Washburn Chattanooga, TN

Nearby Surgical Oncology Physician Providers in North Dakota

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in North Dakota, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Ganai.

One of 4 Surgical Oncology Physician providers enrolled in North Dakota, 3 are shown here.

Dr. Kiarash Mashayek
M.D,M.S
Fargo, ND
Dr. Colette Pameijer
M.D.
Fargo, ND
Dr. Robert Sticca
MD
Grand Forks, ND

Compare Surgical Oncology Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Sabha Ganai, MD, PHD, MPH, FACS's specialty? ▼
Sabha Ganai, MD, PHD, MPH, FACS specializes in Surgical Oncology Physician and practices in Fargo, North Dakota. Credentials: MD, PHD, MPH, FACS.
How much does Sabha Ganai, MD, PHD, MPH, FACS prescribe under Medicare Part D? ▼
In 2024, Sabha Ganai, MD, PHD, MPH, FACS wrote 20 Medicare Part D claims totaling $2K in drug costs for N/A beneficiaries.
What is Sabha Ganai, MD, PHD, MPH, FACS's Medicare quality score? ▼
Sabha Ganai, MD, PHD, MPH, FACS has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 83/100 (Quality: 87.1, Cost: 57.1). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Sabha Ganai, MD, PHD, MPH, FACS located? ▼
Sabha Ganai, MD, PHD, MPH, FACS is located at 737 BROADWAY N, Fargo, ND, 58102. Phone: (701) 234-2000.
What is Sabha Ganai, MD, PHD, MPH, FACS's NPI number? ▼
Sabha Ganai, MD, PHD, MPH, FACS's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1821144635, issued on 01/25/2007.
How many Surgical Oncology Physician providers are there in the US? ▼
There are 1,460 Surgical Oncology Physician providers across 51 states in the US. The average Surgical Oncology Physician provider writes 99 Medicare Part D claims per year.
Does Sabha Ganai, MD, PHD, MPH, FACS accept Medicare? ▼
Sabha Ganai, MD, PHD, MPH, FACS appears in CMS Medicare data with 20 Part D claims and N/A Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Sabha Ganai, MD, PHD, MPH, FACS's credentials? ▼
Sabha Ganai, MD, PHD, MPH, FACS's NPI is 1821144635 with credentials MD, PHD, MPH, FACS. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.