2026 NPPES data Nurse Practitioner NPI 1497277354 NP
Verify on CMS →

Sara Rummelhoff, NP

Nurse Practitioner in Stanford, California. This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers — including 87,227 in Nurse Practitioner, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration — see our methodology.

Federal data — no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is — no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
196
Medicare Part D claims · 79 beneficiaries · Nurse Practitioner avg: 1K
Generic prescribing
86%
generic claims · 14% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
75/100
▼ 8 pts below national avg 83.1 · Above neutral
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Sara Rummelhoff, NP reported a CMS MIPS final score of 75/100 — below the 83.1 national average — and filed 196 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

75/100
MIPS score · -8 vs avg
196
Part D claims, 2023
86%
generic prescribing

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) — no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Sara Rummelhoff, NP's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023 — the federal quality measure

75 15th percentile higher than 15% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). This entry sits in this band. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Above this entry. 90–100: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Sara Rummelhoff, NP sits

This provider among nurse practitioner peers

Across the 13,476 nurse practitioner providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Sara Rummelhoff, NP writes more Part D claims than 34% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 14% — placing this provider in the lower-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.148.372.496.6Part D claim volume — percentile in specialtyMIPS quality — percentilePart D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality — percentile: 58Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality — percentile: 63Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality — percentile: 37Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality — percentile: 90Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality — percentile: 25Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality — percentile: 60Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality — percentile: 75Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality — percentile: 33Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality — percentile: 65Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality — percentile: 38Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality — percentile: 78Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality — percentile: 5Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality — percentile: 55Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality — percentile: 40Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality — percentile: 67Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality — percentile: 42Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality — percentile: 27Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality — percentile: 87Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality — percentile: 22Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality — percentile: 8Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality — percentile: 23Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality — percentile: 75Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality — percentile: 60Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality — percentile: 2Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality — percentile: 17Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality — percentile: 70Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality — percentile: 72Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality — percentile: 28Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality — percentile: 52Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality — percentile: 88Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality — percentile: 73Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality — percentile: 20Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality — percentile: 12Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality — percentile: 7Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality — percentile: 30Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality — percentile: 53Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality — percentile: 80Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality — percentile: 48Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality — percentile: 3Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality — percentile: 0Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality — percentile: 43Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality — percentile: 50Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality — percentile: 33Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality — percentile: 57Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality — percentile: 10Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality — percentile: 18Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality — percentile: 47Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality — percentile: 82Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality — percentile: 68Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality — percentile: 83Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality — percentile: 45Sara Rummelhoff, NP — Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 34 · MIPS quality — percentile: 14
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one nurse practitioner peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Sara Rummelhoff, NP. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Sara Rummelhoff, NP?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 07/12/2017

NPI 1497277354

Primary specialty

Nurse Practitioner

High-volume

87,227 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

196 82% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,084

MIPS final score

75/100 8.1 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in California

How Nurse Practitioner compares to other specialties among California providers

California providers

Largest specialties in California (% of in-state providers)

Behavior Technician — 17.3%Behavior Technician17.3%Marriage & Family Therapist — 5.5%Marriage & Family Therapist5.5%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program — 5%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program5%Mental Health Counselor — 3.9%Mental Health Counselor3.9%Pharmacist — 3.5%Pharmacist3.5%Clinical Social Worker — 3.1%Clinical Social Worker3.1%Nurse Practitioner — 0.7%Nurse Practitioner0.7%
Largest specialties in California (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance — MIPS

Sara Rummelhoff, NP's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Nurse Practitioner national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
75/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Nurse Practitioner) — 75/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%75%
MIPS final score (Nurse Practitioner) — 75/100 vs national avg 83.1

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Sara Rummelhoff, NP appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Nurse Practitioner provider holding NP credentials at 300 PASTEUR DR, Stanford, CA, 94305, with a listed phone of (650) 723-4000. NPI 1497277354 was issued on 07/12/2017. Because NPPES data is self-reported by the provider and refreshed monthly, the address, phone, and specialty reflect what Rummelhoff most recently submitted to CMS rather than a vetted directory listing, which is why patients should always confirm the practice is still at this location before scheduling.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 196 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 79 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $26K in drug spend, split 14% brand-name and 86% generic by claim count. These figures capture only Medicare Part D — commercial insurance, Medicaid, and cash-pay prescriptions are not included, and any drug-beneficiary cell under 11 is suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 75/100 for the 2023 performance year, compared with the national average of 83.1.

Nurse Practitioner is a high-volume specialty nationwide, with 87,227 enrolled providers across 56 states and an average of 1,084 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline. Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist — always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

300 PASTEUR DR
Stanford, CA 94305

Provider Details

NPI 1497277354
Specialty Nurse Practitioner
Credentials NP
Gender Female
NPI Issued 07/12/2017

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

75
Final Score
Avg: 83.1

Reporting: Group practice

License & disciplinary context — California MBC 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only — NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~150K California medical licensees in 2023 — they are NOT specific to Sara Rummelhoff, NP. To verify Sara Rummelhoff, NP's current license status, search the MBC public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

576
Total board actions, California 2023
Across 556 cases
3.84
Actions per 1,000 licensees
California statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
186 cases

MBC publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the California disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Typical

Sara Rummelhoff, NP — brand share 14.0%
Nurse Practitioner average

14% brand-name claims vs 86% generic, on 196 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

196
Total Claims
$26K
Total Drug Cost
79
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
271
Total Day Supply
7,600
Brand vs Generic
14% brand / 86% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$22K
Generic Drug Cost
$4K

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
77.0 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.76
Gender Split
57% female / 43% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Sara Rummelhoff, NP prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Metoprolol Succinate
17
Colchicine
16
Pantoprazole Sodium
15
Furosemide
12

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Nurse Practitioner Overview

How Sara Rummelhoff, NP fits within the Nurse Practitioner landscape nationally.

87,227
Nurse Practitioner Providers in US
56
States with Nurse Practitioner
1,084
Avg Claims per Provider

Sara Rummelhoff, NP's 196 claims are below the specialty average of 1,084.

Nearby Nurse Practitioner Providers in California

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in California, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Rummelhoff.

Compare Nurse Practitioner nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry — providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the California medical board — federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Nurse Practitioner peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only — they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Sara Rummelhoff, NP's specialty?
Sara Rummelhoff, NP specializes in Nurse Practitioner and practices in Stanford, California. Credentials: NP.
How much does Sara Rummelhoff, NP prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Sara Rummelhoff, NP wrote 196 Medicare Part D claims totaling $26K in drug costs for 79 beneficiaries.
What is Sara Rummelhoff, NP's Medicare quality score?
Sara Rummelhoff, NP has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 75/100. The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Sara Rummelhoff, NP located?
Sara Rummelhoff, NP is located at 300 PASTEUR DR, Stanford, CA, 94305. Phone: (650) 723-4000.
What is Sara Rummelhoff, NP's NPI number?
Sara Rummelhoff, NP's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1497277354, issued on 07/12/2017.
Does Sara Rummelhoff, NP prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Sara Rummelhoff, NP's prescribing is 14% brand-name and 86% generic drugs by claim count, with $22K in brand drug costs.
How many Nurse Practitioner providers are there in the US?
There are 87,227 Nurse Practitioner providers across 56 states in the US. The average Nurse Practitioner provider writes 1,084 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Sara Rummelhoff, NP prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Sara Rummelhoff, NP's most frequently prescribed drugs include Metoprolol Succinate, Colchicine, Pantoprazole Sodium. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Sara Rummelhoff, NP accept Medicare?
Sara Rummelhoff, NP appears in CMS Medicare data with 196 Part D claims and 79 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Sara Rummelhoff, NP's credentials?
Sara Rummelhoff, NP's NPI is 1497277354 with credentials NP. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) — 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.