2026 NPPES data Family Medicine Physician NPI 1164650628 DO
Verify on CMS →

Sarah Schlie, DO

Family Medicine Physician in Fort Wayne, Indiana. This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers — including 147,640 in Family Medicine Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration — see our methodology.

Federal data — no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is — no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
4K
Medicare Part D claims · 370 beneficiaries · Family Medicine Physician avg: 3K
Generic prescribing
83%
generic claims · 15% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
81.2/100
▼ 2 pts below national avg 83.1 · Above neutral
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Sarah Schlie, DO reported a CMS MIPS final score of 81.2/100 — below the 83.1 national average — and filed 4,312 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

81.2/100
MIPS score · -2 vs avg
4K
Part D claims, 2023
83%
generic prescribing
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) — no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Sarah Schlie, DO's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023 — the federal quality measure

81 36th percentile higher than 36% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). This entry sits in this band. 90–100: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Sarah Schlie, DO sits

This provider among family medicine physician peers

Across the 22,040 family medicine physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Sarah Schlie, DO writes more Part D claims than 62% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 33% — placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume — percentile in specialtyMIPS quality — percentilePart D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality — percentile: 82Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality — percentile: 47Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality — percentile: 68Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality — percentile: 60Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality — percentile: 77Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality — percentile: 37Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality — percentile: 80Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality — percentile: 90Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality — percentile: 38Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality — percentile: 63Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality — percentile: 58Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality — percentile: 42Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality — percentile: 22Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality — percentile: 15Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality — percentile: 98Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality — percentile: 20Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality — percentile: 35Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality — percentile: 43Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality — percentile: 10Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality — percentile: 12Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality — percentile: 72Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality — percentile: 17Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality — percentile: 2Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality — percentile: 8Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality — percentile: 73Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality — percentile: 87Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality — percentile: 3Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality — percentile: 40Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality — percentile: 27Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality — percentile: 97Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality — percentile: 0Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality — percentile: 50Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality — percentile: 78Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality — percentile: 5Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality — percentile: 62Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality — percentile: 28Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality — percentile: 25Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality — percentile: 50Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality — percentile: 17Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality — percentile: 48Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality — percentile: 33Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality — percentile: 7Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality — percentile: 30Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality — percentile: 45Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality — percentile: 82Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality — percentile: 98Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality — percentile: 68Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality — percentile: 73Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality — percentile: 50Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality — percentile: 55Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality — percentile: 63Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality — percentile: 87Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality — percentile: 57Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality — percentile: 67Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Sarah Schlie, DO — Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality — percentile: 33
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one family medicine physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Sarah Schlie, DO. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic — not verified)

Sarah Schlie, DO practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting + 1 hospital affiliation — signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Sarah Schlie, DO?

Near national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 06/23/2009

NPI 1164650628

Primary specialty

Family Medicine Physician

High-volume

147,640 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

4,312 26% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 3,418

MIPS final score

81.2/100 1.9 pts vs avg

Above neutral band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Indiana

How Family Medicine Physician compares to other specialties among Indiana providers

Indiana providers

Largest specialties in Indiana (% of in-state providers)

Behavior Technician — 13.6%Behavior Technician13.6%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program — 4.7%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program4.7%Pharmacist — 4.3%Pharmacist4.3%Family Nurse Practitioner — 4.2%Family Nurse Practitioner4.2%Clinical Social Worker — 4.2%Clinical Social Worker4.2%Mental Health Counselor — 4.1%Mental Health Counselor4.1%Family Medicine Physician — 2.8%Family Medicine Physician2.8%
Largest specialties in Indiana (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance — MIPS

Sarah Schlie, DO's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Family Medicine Physician national average

Near national average
MIPS Final Score
81.2/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Family Medicine Physician) — 81.2/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%81.2%
MIPS final score (Family Medicine Physician) — 81.2/100 vs national avg 83.1

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Sarah Schlie, DO appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Family Medicine Physician provider holding DO credentials at 11055 TWIN CREEKS CV, Fort Wayne, IN, 46845, with a listed phone of (260) 425-6120. NPI 1164650628 was issued on 06/23/2009. Because NPPES data is self-reported by the provider and refreshed monthly, the address, phone, and specialty reflect what Schlie most recently submitted to CMS rather than a vetted directory listing, which is why patients should always confirm the practice is still at this location before scheduling.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 4,312 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 370 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $388K in drug spend, split 15% brand-name and 83% generic by claim count, with an opioid prescribing rate of 1.3%. These figures capture only Medicare Part D — commercial insurance, Medicaid, and cash-pay prescriptions are not included, and any drug-beneficiary cell under 11 is suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 81.2/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 69, Cost 68.5), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Family Medicine Physician is a high-volume specialty nationwide, with 147,640 enrolled providers across 56 states and an average of 3,418 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline. Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist — always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

11055 TWIN CREEKS CV
Fort Wayne, IN 46845

Provider Details

NPI 1164650628
Specialty Family Medicine Physician
Credentials DO
Gender Female
NPI Issued 06/23/2009

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

81.234
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
68.9532
Quality
68.4936
Cost
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Sarah Schlie, DO bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" — a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Parkview Health System Inc
Albion, IN

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Typical

Sarah Schlie, DO — brand share 15.0%
Family Medicine Physician average

15% brand-name claims vs 83% generic, on 4,312 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

4,312
Total Claims
$388K
Total Drug Cost
370
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
10,013
Total Day Supply
292,591
Brand vs Generic
15% brand / 83% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$314K
Generic Drug Cost
$70K
Opioid Claims
58 (1.3% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
74

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
71.3 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.01
Gender Split
74% female / 26% male
Age Distribution
<65: 33, 65-74: 225, 75-84: 95, 85+: 17

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Sarah Schlie, DO prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Levothyroxine Sodium
321
Atorvastatin Calcium
193
Lisinopril
161
Hydrochlorothiazide
120
Amlodipine Besylate
108
Losartan Potassium
107
Omeprazole
105
Metformin Hcl
101
Pantoprazole Sodium
97
Albuterol Sulfate Hfa
Albuterol Sulfate
78

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Family Medicine Physician Overview

How Sarah Schlie, DO fits within the Family Medicine Physician landscape nationally.

147,640
Family Medicine Physician Providers in US
56
States with Family Medicine Physician
3,418
Avg Claims per Provider

Sarah Schlie, DO's 4,312 claims are above the specialty average of 3,418.

Nearby Family Medicine Physician Providers in Indiana

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Indiana, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Schlie.

Compare Family Medicine Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry — providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Indiana medical board — federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Family Medicine Physician peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only — they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Sarah Schlie, DO's specialty?
Sarah Schlie, DO specializes in Family Medicine Physician and practices in Fort Wayne, Indiana. Credentials: DO.
How much does Sarah Schlie, DO prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Sarah Schlie, DO wrote 4,312 Medicare Part D claims totaling $388K in drug costs for 370 beneficiaries.
What is Sarah Schlie, DO's Medicare quality score?
Sarah Schlie, DO has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 81.2/100 (Quality: 69, Cost: 68.5). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Sarah Schlie, DO located?
Sarah Schlie, DO is located at 11055 TWIN CREEKS CV, Fort Wayne, IN, 46845. Phone: (260) 425-6120.
What is Sarah Schlie, DO's NPI number?
Sarah Schlie, DO's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1164650628, issued on 06/23/2009.
Does Sarah Schlie, DO prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Sarah Schlie, DO's prescribing is 15% brand-name and 83% generic drugs by claim count, with $314K in brand drug costs.
Does Sarah Schlie, DO prescribe opioids?
Yes, Sarah Schlie, DO had 58 opioid claims in 2023 with an opioid prescribing rate of 1.3%.
How many Family Medicine Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 147,640 Family Medicine Physician providers across 56 states in the US. The average Family Medicine Physician provider writes 3,418 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Sarah Schlie, DO prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Sarah Schlie, DO's most frequently prescribed drugs include Levothyroxine Sodium, Atorvastatin Calcium, Lisinopril. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Sarah Schlie, DO accept Medicare?
Sarah Schlie, DO appears in CMS Medicare data with 4,312 Part D claims and 370 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Sarah Schlie, DO's credentials?
Sarah Schlie, DO's NPI is 1164650628 with credentials DO. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) — 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.