2026 NPPES data General Practice Physician NPI 1366459075 MD
Verify on CMS →

Sergei Zakharyan, MD

General Practice Physician in Fresno, California.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 16,725 in General Practice Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
6K
Medicare Part D claims · 378 beneficiaries · General Practice Physician avg: 3K
Generic prescribing
83%
generic claims · 16% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
32.2/100
▼ 51 pts below national avg 83.1 · Below average
Industry payments
$95.82
5 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Sergei Zakharyan, MD reported a CMS MIPS final score of 32.2/100 - below the 83.1 national average - and filed 6,437 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

32.2/100
MIPS score · -51 vs avg
6K
Part D claims, 2023
83%
generic prescribing
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Sergei Zakharyan, MD's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure

32 3rd percentile higher than 3% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). This entry sits in this band. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Above this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Above this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Above this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 scored providers (40%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Sergei Zakharyan, MD sits

This provider among general practice physician peers

Across the 783 general practice physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Sergei Zakharyan, MD writes more Part D claims than 82% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 11% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePart D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 98Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 98Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 97Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Sergei Zakharyan, MD-Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 11
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one general practice physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Sergei Zakharyan, MD. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Sergei Zakharyan, MD practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Sergei Zakharyan, MD?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 08/02/2006

NPI 1366459075

Primary specialty

General Practice Physician

Mid-sized

16,725 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

6,437 124% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 2,872

MIPS final score

32.2/100 50.9 pts vs avg

Below average band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in California

How General Practice Physician compares to other specialties among California providers

California providers
Behavior Technician - 17.3%Behavior Technician17.3%Marriage & Family Therapist - 5.5%Marriage & Family Therapist5.5%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program - 5%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program5%Mental Health Counselor - 3.9%Mental Health Counselor3.9%Pharmacist - 3.5%Pharmacist3.5%Clinical Social Worker - 3.1%Clinical Social Worker3.1%General Practice Physician - 0.2%General Practice Physician0.2%
Largest specialties in California (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Sergei Zakharyan, MD's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the General Practice Physician national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
32.2/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (General Practice Physician) - 32.2/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%32.2%
MIPS final score (General Practice Physician) - 32.2/100 vs national avg 83.1
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Sergei Zakharyan, MD appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a General Practice Physician provider holding MD credentials at 1095 E SHAW AVE, Fresno, CA, 93710, with a listed phone of (559) 224-0106. NPI 1366459075 was issued on 08/02/2006.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 6,437 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 378 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $1.2 million in drug spend, split 16% brand-name and 83% generic by claim count, with an opioid prescribing rate of 0.5%. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 32.2/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 15, Cost 70.7), compared with the national average of 83.1.

General Practice Physician is a mid-sized specialty nationwide, with 16,725 enrolled providers across 56 states and an average of 2,872 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline.

Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist, always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

1095 E SHAW AVE
Fresno, CA 93710

Provider Details

NPI 1366459075
Specialty General Practice Physician
Credentials MD
Gender Male
NPI Issued 08/02/2006

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

32.2021
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
15
Quality
70.6735
Cost

Reporting: Individual

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Sergei Zakharyan, MD. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$96

Largest payer

Lilly USA, LLC

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

License & disciplinary context - California MBC 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~150K California medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Sergei Zakharyan, MD. To verify Sergei Zakharyan, MD's current license status, search the MBC public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

576
Total board actions, California 2023
Across 556 cases
3.84
Actions per 1,000 licensees
California statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
186 cases

MBC publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the California disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Typical

Sergei Zakharyan, MD - brand share 16.0%
General Practice Physician average

16% brand-name claims vs 83% generic, on 6,437 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

6,437
Total Claims
$1.2M
Total Drug Cost
378
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
15,416
Total Day Supply
455,500
Brand vs Generic
16% brand / 83% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$998K
Generic Drug Cost
$182K
Opioid Claims
32 (0.5% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
93

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
71.2 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.29
Gender Split
54% female / 46% male
Age Distribution
<65: 53, 65-74: 199, 75-84: 88, 85+: 38

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Sergei Zakharyan, MD prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2023

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2023
Drug Claims
Atorvastatin Calcium
636
Lisinopril
371
Metformin Hcl
329
Levothyroxine Sodium
296
Amlodipine Besylate
227
Rosuvastatin Calcium
217
Famotidine
168
Losartan Potassium
165
Omeprazole
164
Jardiance
Empagliflozin
145

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

General Practice Physician Overview

How Sergei Zakharyan, MD fits within the General Practice Physician landscape nationally.

16,725
General Practice Physician Providers in US
56
States with General Practice Physician
2,872
Avg Claims per Provider

Sergei Zakharyan, MD's 6,437 claims are above the specialty average of 2,872.

Nearby General Practice Physician Providers in California

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in California, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Zakharyan.

Compare General Practice Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry, providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the California medical board, federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby General Practice Physician peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only, they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Sergei Zakharyan, MD's specialty?
Sergei Zakharyan, MD specializes in General Practice Physician and practices in Fresno, California. Credentials: MD.
How much does Sergei Zakharyan, MD prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Sergei Zakharyan, MD wrote 6,437 Medicare Part D claims totaling $1.2M in drug costs for 378 beneficiaries.
What is Sergei Zakharyan, MD's Medicare quality score?
Sergei Zakharyan, MD has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 32.2/100 (Quality: 15, Cost: 70.7). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Sergei Zakharyan, MD located?
Sergei Zakharyan, MD is located at 1095 E SHAW AVE, Fresno, CA, 93710. Phone: (559) 224-0106.
What is Sergei Zakharyan, MD's NPI number?
Sergei Zakharyan, MD's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1366459075, issued on 08/02/2006.
Does Sergei Zakharyan, MD prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Sergei Zakharyan, MD's prescribing is 16% brand-name and 83% generic drugs by claim count, with $998K in brand drug costs.
Does Sergei Zakharyan, MD prescribe opioids?
Yes, Sergei Zakharyan, MD had 32 opioid claims in 2023 with an opioid prescribing rate of 0.5%.
How many General Practice Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 16,725 General Practice Physician providers across 56 states in the US. The average General Practice Physician provider writes 2,872 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Sergei Zakharyan, MD prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Sergei Zakharyan, MD's most frequently prescribed drugs include Atorvastatin Calcium, Lisinopril, Metformin Hcl. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Sergei Zakharyan, MD accept Medicare?
Sergei Zakharyan, MD appears in CMS Medicare data with 6,437 Part D claims and 378 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Sergei Zakharyan, MD's credentials?
Sergei Zakharyan, MD's NPI is 1366459075 with credentials MD. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.