PlainDoctor

2026 NPPES data Medical-Surgical Registered Nurse NPI 1932447406 FNP
Verify on CMS →

Sofia Malik, FNP

Medical-Surgical Registered Nurse in Luling, Texas.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 3,721 in Medical-Surgical Registered Nurse, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
2K
Medicare Part D claims · 67 beneficiaries · Medical-Surgical Registered Nurse avg: 941
Generic prescribing
86%
generic claims · 14% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
26.4/100
▼ 57 pts below national avg 83.5 · Below average
Verify NPI on CMS Methodology
Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

What the federal data shows

Sofia Malik, FNP reported a CMS MIPS final score of 26.4/100 - below the 83.5 national average - and filed 1,549 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

26.4/100
MIPS score · -57 vs avg
2K
Part D claims, 2024
86%
generic prescribing
≥3rd
pct among measured MIPS (lower-bound band)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Sofia Malik, FNP

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1932447406), first enumerated 01/17/2013.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 1,549 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 26.4/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • State context

    State board disciplinary context

    Texas statewide board action statistics are published annually — these figures describe aggregate state activity, not Sofia Malik, FNP's individual license status. Verify directly with the state medical board.

    Source: TMB annual report 2023

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1932447406 · Medical-Surgical Registered Nurse

NPI-10 · ENUM-MID · TAX-NARROW · MIPS-LOW · RX-MID · BOOK-THIN · NEAR-MIPS

  • NPI-10 1932447406
  • ENUM-MID 2013
  • TAX-NARROW 3,721
  • MIPS-LOW 26.4/100
  • RX-MID 1,549
  • BOOK-THIN 293 in Texas
  • NEAR-MIPS Jana Doyle, AGPCNP-BC · 11.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Sofia Malik, FNP's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

26 ≥ 3rd percentile 3% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). This entry sits in this band. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Above this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Above this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Above this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Above this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Above this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). Above this entry. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Sofia Malik, FNP sits

This provider among medical-surgical registered nurse peers

Across the 86 medical-surgical registered nurse providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Sofia Malik, FNP writes more Part D claims than 80% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 1% - placing this provider in the high-volume, lower-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.148.372.496.6Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 63Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Sofia Malik, FNP, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 1
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one medical-surgical registered nurse peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Sofia Malik, FNP. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Sofia Malik, FNP?

Below national average

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 01/17/2013

NPI 1932447406

Primary specialty

Medical-Surgical Registered Nurse

Niche

3,721 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

1,549 65% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 941

MIPS final score

26.4/100 57.1 pts vs avg

Below average band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in Texas

How Medical-Surgical Registered Nurse compares to other specialties among Texas providers

Texas providers
Behavior Technician6%Student in an Organized Heal…5.3%Family Nurse Practitioner4.5%Professional Counselor4.4%Pharmacist4.3%Speech-Language Pathologist3.9%Medical-Surgical Registered …0.1%
Largest specialties in Texas (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Sofia Malik, FNP's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Medical-Surgical Registered Nurse national average

Below national average
MIPS Final Score
26.4/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%26.4%
MIPS final score (Medical-Surgical Registered Nurse) - 26.4/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

130 HAYS ST
Luling, TX 78648
(830) 875-7000

Provider Details

NPI 1932447406
Specialty Medical-Surgical Registered Nurse
Credentials FNP
Gender Female
NPI Issued 01/17/2013

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

26.4114
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
23.0391
Quality
41.7281
Cost
0
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Group practice

License & disciplinary context - Texas TMB 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~77K Texas medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Sofia Malik, FNP. To verify Sofia Malik, FNP's current license status, search the TMB public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

344
Total board actions, Texas 2023
Across 334 cases
4.47
Actions per 1,000 licensees
Texas statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
94 cases

TMB publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the Texas disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Typical

Sofia Malik, FNP - brand share 14.0%
Medical-Surgical Registered Nurse average

14% brand-name claims vs 86% generic, on 1,549 2024 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

1,549
Total Claims
$64K
Total Drug Cost
67
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
1,550.333
Total Day Supply
40,859
Brand vs Generic
14% brand / 86% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$24K
Generic Drug Cost
$41K
Antibiotic Claims
23

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
74.6 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
2.05
Gender Split
51% female / 49% male

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Sofia Malik, FNP prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Memantine Hcl
 96
Donepezil Hcl
 93
Furosemide
 77
Omeprazole
 74
Oxcarbazepine
 57
Levetiracetam
 55
Lisinopril
 55
Atorvastatin Calcium
 47
Sertraline Hcl
 46
Clopidogrel
Clopidogrel Bisulfate
45

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

More Medical-Surgical Registered Nurse in TX → All providers in Texas → Compare specialties →

Medical-Surgical Registered Nurse Overview

How Sofia Malik, FNP fits within the Medical-Surgical Registered Nurse landscape nationally.

3,721
Medical-Surgical Registered Nurse Providers in US
54
States with Medical-Surgical Registered Nurse
941
Avg Claims per Provider

Sofia Malik, FNP's 1,549 claims are above the specialty average of 941.

Nationwide Medical-Surgical Registered Nurse peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Malik, both outside Texas so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (26.4 here).

Jana Doyle 37.4 IN Silvy Powathil 7 IL Nicole Valdes 64.8 FL Michelle Loya 66 MD

Same NPPES enumeration year (2013)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Maureen Vidnovic Greensburg, PA Korin Burdo Elizabethtown, NY Paul Brinton Pocatello, ID Erin Quintana Greeley, CO

Nearby Medical-Surgical Registered Nurse Providers in Texas

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Texas, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Malik.

One of 293 Medical-Surgical Registered Nurse providers enrolled in Texas, 5 are shown here.

Alfy Abraham
San Antonio, TX
Antonine Akinyemi
RN
Fort Worth, TX
Kelley Al-Dhalaan
Weimar, TX
April Joy Aljibe
RN
San Antonio, TX
Noelito Alog
RN
Harlingen, TX

Compare Medical-Surgical Registered Nurse nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Sofia Malik, FNP's specialty? ▼
Sofia Malik, FNP specializes in Medical-Surgical Registered Nurse and practices in Luling, Texas. Credentials: FNP.
How much does Sofia Malik, FNP prescribe under Medicare Part D? ▼
In 2024, Sofia Malik, FNP wrote 1,549 Medicare Part D claims totaling $64K in drug costs for 67 beneficiaries.
What is Sofia Malik, FNP's Medicare quality score? ▼
Sofia Malik, FNP has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 26.4/100 (Quality: 23, Cost: 41.7). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Sofia Malik, FNP located? ▼
Sofia Malik, FNP is located at 130 HAYS ST, Luling, TX, 78648. Phone: (830) 875-7000.
What is Sofia Malik, FNP's NPI number? ▼
Sofia Malik, FNP's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1932447406, issued on 01/17/2013.
Does Sofia Malik, FNP prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs? ▼
Sofia Malik, FNP's prescribing is 14% brand-name and 86% generic drugs by claim count, with $24K in brand drug costs.
How many Medical-Surgical Registered Nurse providers are there in the US? ▼
There are 3,721 Medical-Surgical Registered Nurse providers across 54 states in the US. The average Medical-Surgical Registered Nurse provider writes 941 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Sofia Malik, FNP prescribe most often? ▼
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Sofia Malik, FNP's most frequently prescribed drugs include Memantine Hcl, Donepezil Hcl, Furosemide. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Sofia Malik, FNP accept Medicare? ▼
Sofia Malik, FNP appears in CMS Medicare data with 1,549 Part D claims and 67 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Sofia Malik, FNP's credentials? ▼
Sofia Malik, FNP's NPI is 1932447406 with credentials FNP. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the editorial process.

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.