2026 NPPES data Hospitalist Physician NPI 1053748236 D.O., M.S.
Verify on CMS →

Sonia Borker, D.O., M.S.

Hospitalist Physician in Jersey City, New Jersey.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 17,950 in Hospitalist Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
167
Medicare Part D claims · 71 beneficiaries · Hospitalist Physician avg: 940
Generic prescribing
84%
generic claims · 16% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
91.3/100
▲ 8 pts above national avg 83.5 · Exceptional
Industry payments
$114.21
2 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)

What the federal data shows

Sonia Borker, D.O., M.S. reported a CMS MIPS final score of 91.3/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 167 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

91.3/100
MIPS score · +8 vs avg
167
Part D claims, 2024
84%
generic prescribing
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Sonia Borker, D.O., M.S.

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1053748236), first enumerated 10/02/2013.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 167 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 91.3/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Board certification signal

    Heuristic suggests board-certified status based on ABMS-eligible specialty taxonomy plus active CMS participation signals — not a direct ABMS verification.

    Source: NUCC taxonomy + CMS participation heuristic

  • Reported

    Hospital affiliations

    1 CMS Care Compare hospital affiliation on record — practice footprint from the Doctors and Clinicians file.

    Source: CMS Care Compare

  • Reported

    Industry payment transparency

    $114.21 in reported industry payments (2 transfers) in 2024 under the federal Sunshine Act — disclosed transfers of value, not a quality rating.

    Source: CMS Open Payments

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1053748236 · Hospitalist Physician

NPI-10 · ENUM-MID · TAX-MID · MIPS-ABOVE · RX-LIGHT · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1053748236
  • ENUM-MID 2013
  • TAX-MID 18K Hospitalist Physician
  • MIPS-ABOVE 91.3/100
  • RX-LIGHT 167
  • BOOK-THIN 455 in New Jersey
  • PHOTO-FINISH Sudeep Acharya · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Sonia Borker, D.O., M.S.'s MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

91 ≥ 61st percentile 61% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Below this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Sonia Borker, D.O., M.S. sits

This provider among hospitalist physician peers

Across the 4,317 hospitalist physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Sonia Borker, D.O., M.S. writes more Part D claims than 35% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 56% - placing this provider in the lower-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.949.974.899.8Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 95Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Sonia Borker, D.O., M.S., Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 56
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one hospitalist physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Sonia Borker, D.O., M.S.. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Sonia Borker, D.O., M.S. practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting + 1 hospital affiliation - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Sonia Borker, D.O., M.S.?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 10/02/2013

NPI 1053748236

Primary specialty

Hospitalist Physician

Mid-sized

17,950 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

167 82% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 940

MIPS final score

91.3/100 7.8 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in New Jersey

How Hospitalist Physician compares to other specialties among New Jersey providers

New Jersey providers
Mental Health Counselor6.2%Physical Therapist5.8%Student in an Organized Heal…5.6%Clinical Social Worker5.5%Pharmacist5%Internal Medicine Physician3.1%Hospitalist Physician0.3%
Largest specialties in New Jersey (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Sonia Borker, D.O., M.S.'s 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Hospitalist Physician national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
91.3/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%91.3%
MIPS final score (Hospitalist Physician) - 91.3/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

176 PALISADE AVE
Jersey City, NJ 07306

Provider Details

NPI 1053748236
Specialty Hospitalist Physician
Credentials D.O., M.S.
Gender Female
NPI Issued 10/02/2013

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

91.2532
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
74.9203
Quality
91.6794
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Alternative Payment Model

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Sonia Borker, D.O., M.S. bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

North Shore-Lij Medical PC
Sleepy Hollow, NY

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

Industry payments received (2024) - CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Sonia Borker, D.O., M.S.. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$114

Largest payer

Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias, they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Typical

Sonia Borker, D.O., M.S. - brand share 16.0%
Hospitalist Physician average

16% brand-name claims vs 84% generic, on 167 2024 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

167
Total Claims
$27K
Total Drug Cost
71
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
174.167
Total Day Supply
3,628
Brand vs Generic
16% brand / 84% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$9K
Generic Drug Cost
$18K
Antibiotic Claims
39

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
78.2 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
2.29
Gender Split
56% female / 44% male

Hospitalist Physician Overview

How Sonia Borker, D.O., M.S. fits within the Hospitalist Physician landscape nationally.

17,950
Hospitalist Physician Providers in US
54
States with Hospitalist Physician
940
Avg Claims per Provider

Sonia Borker, D.O., M.S.'s 167 claims are below the specialty average of 940.

Nationwide Hospitalist Physician peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Borker, both outside New Jersey so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (91.3 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2013)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Hospitalist Physician Providers in New Jersey

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in New Jersey, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Borker.

One of 455 Hospitalist Physician providers enrolled in New Jersey, 5 are shown here.

Compare Hospitalist Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Sonia Borker, D.O., M.S.'s specialty?
Sonia Borker, D.O., M.S. specializes in Hospitalist Physician and practices in Jersey City, New Jersey. Credentials: D.O., M.S..
How much does Sonia Borker, D.O., M.S. prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Sonia Borker, D.O., M.S. wrote 167 Medicare Part D claims totaling $27K in drug costs for 71 beneficiaries.
What is Sonia Borker, D.O., M.S.'s Medicare quality score?
Sonia Borker, D.O., M.S. has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 91.3/100 (Quality: 74.9). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Sonia Borker, D.O., M.S. located?
Sonia Borker, D.O., M.S. is located at 176 PALISADE AVE, Jersey City, NJ, 07306. Phone: (201) 795-8201.
What is Sonia Borker, D.O., M.S.'s NPI number?
Sonia Borker, D.O., M.S.'s National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1053748236, issued on 10/02/2013.
Does Sonia Borker, D.O., M.S. prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Sonia Borker, D.O., M.S.'s prescribing is 16% brand-name and 84% generic drugs by claim count, with $9K in brand drug costs.
How many Hospitalist Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 17,950 Hospitalist Physician providers across 54 states in the US. The average Hospitalist Physician provider writes 940 Medicare Part D claims per year.
Does Sonia Borker, D.O., M.S. accept Medicare?
Sonia Borker, D.O., M.S. appears in CMS Medicare data with 167 Part D claims and 71 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Sonia Borker, D.O., M.S.'s credentials?
Sonia Borker, D.O., M.S.'s NPI is 1053748236 with credentials D.O., M.S.. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.