2026 NPPES data Pain Medicine Physician NPI 1326033879 MD PHD
Verify on CMS →

Steven Brockman, MD PHD

Pain Medicine Physician in Shelby, North Carolina.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 1,006 in Pain Medicine Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
3K
Medicare Part D claims · 363 beneficiaries · Pain Medicine Physician avg: 2K
Generic prescribing
97%
generic claims · 3% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
100/100
▲ 17 pts above national avg 83.5 · Exceptional

What the federal data shows

Steven Brockman, MD PHD reported a CMS MIPS final score of 100/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 3,050 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

100/100
MIPS score · +17 vs avg
3K
Part D claims, 2024
97%
generic prescribing
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Steven Brockman, MD PHD

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1326033879), first enumerated 09/12/2005.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 3,050 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 100/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Board certification signal

    Heuristic suggests board-certified status based on ABMS-eligible specialty taxonomy plus active CMS participation signals — not a direct ABMS verification.

    Source: NUCC taxonomy + CMS participation heuristic

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1326033879 · Pain Medicine Physician

NPI-10 · ENUM-LEGACY · TAX-NARROW · MIPS-ELITE · RX-MID · BOOK-THIN · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1326033879
  • ENUM-LEGACY 2005
  • TAX-NARROW 1,006
  • MIPS-ELITE 100/100
  • RX-MID 3,050
  • BOOK-THIN 57 in North Carolina
  • PHOTO-FINISH Muhammad Alghannam · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Steven Brockman, MD PHD's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

100 ≥ 92nd percentile 92% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Below this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Steven Brockman, MD PHD sits

This provider among pain medicine physician peers

Across the 262 pain medicine physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Steven Brockman, MD PHD writes more Part D claims than 65% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 94% - placing this provider in the high-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100024.749.474.098.7Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 82Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 83Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 92Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 48Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 68Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 42Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 55Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 93Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Steven Brockman, MD PHD, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 94
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one pain medicine physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Steven Brockman, MD PHD. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Steven Brockman, MD PHD practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Steven Brockman, MD PHD?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 09/12/2005

NPI 1326033879

Primary specialty

Pain Medicine Physician

Niche

1,006 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

3,050 46% vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 2,094

MIPS final score

100/100 16.5 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in North Carolina

How Pain Medicine Physician compares to other specialties among North Carolina providers

North Carolina providers
Clinical Social Worker7.1%Behavior Technician6.8%Pharmacist4.9%Student in an Organized Heal…4.7%Physical Therapist4.2%Mental Health Counselor4.2%Pain Medicine Physician0%
Largest specialties in North Carolina (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Steven Brockman, MD PHD's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Pain Medicine Physician national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
100/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%99%
MIPS final score (Pain Medicine Physician) - 100/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

1112 YANCEY ST
Shelby, NC 28150

Provider Details

NPI 1326033879
Specialty Pain Medicine Physician
Credentials MD PHD
Gender Male
NPI Issued 09/12/2005

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

100
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
96
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Individual

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Generic-heavy

Steven Brockman, MD PHD - brand share 3.0%
Pain Medicine Physician average

3% brand-name claims vs 97% generic, on 3,050 2024 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

3,050
Total Claims
$135K
Total Drug Cost
363
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
3,126
Total Day Supply
92,420
Brand vs Generic
3% brand / 97% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$43K
Generic Drug Cost
$91K
Opioid Claims
2,518 (82.6% rate)

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
67.0 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.61
Gender Split
61% female / 39% male
Age Distribution
<65: 144, 65-74: 125, 75-84: 78, 85+: 16

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Steven Brockman, MD PHD prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen
Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen
1,206
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen
Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen
578
Oxycodone Hcl
416
Gabapentin
123
Tizanidine Hcl
112
Morphine Sulfate Er
Morphine Sulfate
89
Tramadol Hcl
64
Pregabalin
50
Fentanyl
36
Morphine Sulfate
31

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Pain Medicine Physician Overview

How Steven Brockman, MD PHD fits within the Pain Medicine Physician landscape nationally.

1,006
Pain Medicine Physician Providers in US
49
States with Pain Medicine Physician
2,094
Avg Claims per Provider

Steven Brockman, MD PHD's 3,050 claims are above the specialty average of 2,094.

Nationwide Pain Medicine Physician peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Brockman, both outside North Carolina so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (100 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2005)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Pain Medicine Physician Providers in North Carolina

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in North Carolina, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Brockman.

One of 57 Pain Medicine Physician providers enrolled in North Carolina, 5 are shown here.

Compare Pain Medicine Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Steven Brockman, MD PHD's specialty?
Steven Brockman, MD PHD specializes in Pain Medicine Physician and practices in Shelby, North Carolina. Credentials: MD PHD.
How much does Steven Brockman, MD PHD prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Steven Brockman, MD PHD wrote 3,050 Medicare Part D claims totaling $135K in drug costs for 363 beneficiaries.
What is Steven Brockman, MD PHD's Medicare quality score?
Steven Brockman, MD PHD has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 100/100. The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Steven Brockman, MD PHD located?
Steven Brockman, MD PHD is located at 1112 YANCEY ST, Shelby, NC, 28150. Phone: (704) 481-7713.
What is Steven Brockman, MD PHD's NPI number?
Steven Brockman, MD PHD's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1326033879, issued on 09/12/2005.
Does Steven Brockman, MD PHD prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Steven Brockman, MD PHD's prescribing is 3% brand-name and 97% generic drugs by claim count, with $43K in brand drug costs.
Does Steven Brockman, MD PHD prescribe opioids?
Yes, Steven Brockman, MD PHD had 2,518 opioid claims in 2024 with an opioid prescribing rate of 82.6%.
How many Pain Medicine Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 1,006 Pain Medicine Physician providers across 49 states in the US. The average Pain Medicine Physician provider writes 2,094 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Steven Brockman, MD PHD prescribe most often?
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Steven Brockman, MD PHD's most frequently prescribed drugs include Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen, Oxycodone-Acetaminophen, Oxycodone Hcl. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Steven Brockman, MD PHD accept Medicare?
Steven Brockman, MD PHD appears in CMS Medicare data with 3,050 Part D claims and 363 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Steven Brockman, MD PHD's credentials?
Steven Brockman, MD PHD's NPI is 1326033879 with credentials MD PHD. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.