2026 NPPES data Infectious Disease Physician NPI 1366609711 MD
Verify on CMS →

Tanya Ellman, MD

Infectious Disease Physician in New York, New York.

This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers - including 8,537 in Infectious Disease Physician, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration, see our methodology.

Federal data, no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is - no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
4K
Medicare Part D claims · 182 beneficiaries · Infectious Disease Physician avg: 807
Generic prescribing
60%
generic claims · 39% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
100/100
▲ 17 pts above national avg 83.5 · Exceptional

What the federal data shows

Tanya Ellman, MD reported a CMS MIPS final score of 100/100 - above the 83.5 national average - and filed 4,274 Medicare Part D claims in 2024.

100/100
MIPS score · +17 vs avg
4K
Part D claims, 2024
60%
generic prescribing
Likely
board-certified (heuristic)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) - no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Federal trust snapshot

What official records show about Tanya Ellman, MD

Federal records show an active NPI with both Medicare prescribing volume and a measured CMS quality score — objective registry data, not patient reviews.

  • Verified

    NPI registry status

    Active listing in the CMS National Provider Identifier Registry (NPI 1366609711), first enumerated 05/21/2008.

    Source: CMS NPPES

  • Reported

    Medicare Part D participation

    Filed 4,274 Medicare Part D prescription claims in the 2023 CMS public use file — indicates active Medicare prescribing participation.

    Source: CMS Part D Prescriber PUF

  • Reported

    CMS quality reporting (MIPS)

    Reported a CMS MIPS final score of 100/100 in the Quality Payment Program — a federal quality measure, not a patient review.

    Source: CMS Quality Payment Program

  • Reported

    Board certification signal

    Heuristic suggests board-certified status based on ABMS-eligible specialty taxonomy plus active CMS participation signals — not a direct ABMS verification.

    Source: NUCC taxonomy + CMS participation heuristic

  • Reported

    Hospital affiliations

    1 CMS Care Compare hospital affiliation on record — practice footprint from the Doctors and Clinicians file.

    Source: CMS Care Compare

  • State context

    State board disciplinary context

    New York statewide board action statistics are published annually — these figures describe aggregate state activity, not Tanya Ellman, MD's individual license status. Verify directly with the state medical board.

    Source: NYSBPMC annual report 2023

  • Not in federal data

    Individual sanction lookup

    PlainDoctor does not publish per-provider disciplinary determinations. Confirm current license and any individual actions through the state medical board or FSMB verification service.

    Source: State medical board / FSMB

This trust snapshot summarizes only what appears in federal CMS/NPPES public records. It is not a composite score, star rating, patient review, or clinical recommendation. PlainDoctor never fabricates reviews or AggregateRating schema.

CMS NPPES provider registry desk

NPI 1366609711 · Infectious Disease Physician

NPI-10 · ENUM-MID · TAX-MID · MIPS-ELITE · RX-MID · BOOK-LIGHT · PHOTO-FINISH

  • NPI-10 1366609711
  • ENUM-MID 2008
  • TAX-MID 9K Infectious Disease
  • MIPS-ELITE 100/100
  • RX-MID 4,274
  • BOOK-LIGHT 791 in New York
  • PHOTO-FINISH Jessica Altamirano · ±0.0

MIPS final-score neighbourhood

Same-specialty nationwide peers by CMS final score, not geographic proximity

MIPS pts

What this shows Nearest measured MIPS peers for this NUCC specialty (2023 performance year).

Source CMS Quality Payment Program (MIPS) As of 2023

Tanya Ellman, MD's MIPS score vs every measured U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023, the federal quality measure. Clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded.

100 ≥ 92nd percentile 92% of 454,083 measured providers are in lower value bands

0–10: 8,684 measured providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 measured providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 measured providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 94,570 measured providers (21%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 measured providers (29%). Below this entry. 90+: 189,403 measured providers (42%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every measured MIPS clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more measured providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

The percentile is a conservative whole-score-point band: it counts only measured clinicians in lower score bands. A CMS MIPS metric is not a recommendation or a clinical-quality rating by PlainDoctor. See methodology § corpus placement.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Tanya Ellman, MD sits

This provider among infectious disease physician peers

Across the 2,130 infectious disease physician providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Tanya Ellman, MD writes more Part D claims than 97% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 90% - placing this provider in the high-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality0255075100023.647.370.994.5Part D claim volume, percentile in specialtyMIPS quality, percentilePoint, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality, percentile: 87Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality, percentile: 72Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality, percentile: 70Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality, percentile: 52Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality, percentile: 38Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality, percentile: 85Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality, percentile: 45Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality, percentile: 65Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality, percentile: 77Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality, percentile: 30Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality, percentile: 28Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality, percentile: 12Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 75Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality, percentile: 57Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality, percentile: 2Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 10Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality, percentile: 25Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 18 · MIPS quality, percentile: 80Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality, percentile: 33Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality, percentile: 62Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality, percentile: 22Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality, percentile: 53Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality, percentile: 58Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality, percentile: 73Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality, percentile: 27Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality, percentile: 35Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality, percentile: 8Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 50Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality, percentile: 5Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality, percentile: 47Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality, percentile: 3Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality, percentile: 23Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality, percentile: 32Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality, percentile: 7Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality, percentile: 88Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality, percentile: 43Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality, percentile: 60Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality, percentile: 37Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality, percentile: 17Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality, percentile: 67Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality, percentile: 0Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality, percentile: 18Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality, percentile: 40Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality, percentile: 13Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality, percentile: 15Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality, percentile: 78Point, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality, percentile: 20Tanya Ellman, MD, Part D claim volume, percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality, percentile: 90
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one infectious disease physician peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Tanya Ellman, MD. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

Board certification likely (heuristic, not verified)

Tanya Ellman, MD practices in an ABMS-board-eligible specialty and shows active CMS Medicare participation + MIPS quality reporting + 1 hospital affiliation - signals consistent with board-certified status. For verified board certification, see CertificationMatters.org (the official ABMS public lookup).

What does the federal data show about Tanya Ellman, MD?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 05/21/2008

NPI 1366609711

Primary specialty

Infectious Disease Physician

Mid-sized

8,537 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

4,274 vs specialty avg

2024 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 807

MIPS final score

100/100 16.5 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.5 national avg

Specialty distribution in New York

How Infectious Disease Physician compares to other specialties among New York providers

New York providers
Student in an Organized Heal…8%Registered Nurse5.2%Clinical Social Worker4.9%Social Worker4.5%Speech-Language Pathologist4.5%Licensed Practical Nurse4.3%Infectious Disease Physician0.1%
Largest specialties in New York (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance, MIPS

Tanya Ellman, MD's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Infectious Disease Physician national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
100/100
vs 83.5 national avg · 2023 performance year
0%100%National avg84%99%
MIPS final score (Infectious Disease Physician) - 100/100 vs national avg 83.5
How MIPS and board certification work

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Practice Address

525 E 68TH ST # F24
New York, NY 10065

Provider Details

NPI 1366609711
Specialty Infectious Disease Physician
Credentials MD
Gender Female
NPI Issued 05/21/2008

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

100
Final Score
Measured-score avg: 83.5
86.8066
Quality
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Alternative Payment Model

Hospital and facility affiliations

Facilities where Tanya Ellman, MD bills Medicare from. Star ratings (1-5) are CMS Hospital Compare's "Hospital overall rating" - a composite of mortality, readmission, patient experience, safety, timely care, and efficient use of medical imaging measures. Source: CMS Care Compare.

Weill Medical College OF Cornell
New York, NY

Affiliations sourced from CMS Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File; hospital ratings from CMS Hospital General Information dataset (cross-referenced by facility name + state).

License & disciplinary context - New York NYSBPMC 2023 annual report

Aggregate state board data only, NOT a determination of any individual provider's status. The figures below describe statewide disciplinary activity across all ~100K New York medical licensees in 2023 - they are NOT specific to Tanya Ellman, MD. To verify Tanya Ellman, MD's current license status, search the NYSBPMC public license lookup directly, or check the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) verification service.

312
Total board actions, New York 2023
Across 302 cases
3.12
Actions per 1,000 licensees
New York statewide rate
probation
Most common action type
89 cases

NYSBPMC publishes annual disciplinary statistics as part of public-record reporting under each state's Administrative Procedure Act. See the full breakdown by action type and year on the New York disciplinary trends page. Cross-checked against FSMB U.S. Medical Regulatory Trends.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Above average

Tanya Ellman, MD - brand share 39.0%
Infectious Disease Physician average

39% brand-name claims vs 60% generic, on 4,274 2024 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2024.

4,274
Total Claims
$4.1M
Total Drug Cost
182
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
5,547.633
Total Day Supply
160,376
Brand vs Generic
39% brand / 60% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$4.0M
Generic Drug Cost
$144K
Opioid Claims
34 (0.8% rate)
Antibiotic Claims
39

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
64.8 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
2.34
Gender Split
38% female / 62% male
Age Distribution
<65: 66, 65-74: 100, 75-84: N/A, 85+: N/A

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2024. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

What Tanya Ellman, MD prescribes most

Top Medicare Part D drugs by claim count, 2024

claims
Source CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File As of 2024
Drug Claims
Biktarvy
Bictegrav/Emtricit/Tenofov Ala
404
Atorvastatin Calcium
223
Losartan Potassium
144
Gabapentin
131
Valacyclovir
Valacyclovir Hcl
127
Tivicay
Dolutegravir Sodium
123
Dovato
Dolutegravir Sodium/Lamivudine
121
Amlodipine Besylate
115
Rosuvastatin Calcium
94
Albuterol Sulfate Hfa
Albuterol Sulfate
92

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Infectious Disease Physician Overview

How Tanya Ellman, MD fits within the Infectious Disease Physician landscape nationally.

8,537
Infectious Disease Physician Providers in US
54
States with Infectious Disease Physician
807
Avg Claims per Provider

Tanya Ellman, MD's 4,274 claims are above the specialty average of 807.

Nationwide Infectious Disease Physician peers with similar MIPS or enrollment year

Two federal-record peer sets for Ellman, both outside New York so the neighborhoods are not geographic containment.

Similar MIPS final score

Nearest same-specialty clinicians by CMS MIPS final score (100 here).

Same NPPES enumeration year (2008)

Same-specialty clinicians who entered the NPI registry in the same calendar year, outside this state.

Nearby Infectious Disease Physician Providers in New York

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in New York, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Ellman.

One of 791 Infectious Disease Physician providers enrolled in New York, 5 are shown here.

Compare Infectious Disease Physician nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Tanya Ellman, MD's specialty?
Tanya Ellman, MD specializes in Infectious Disease Physician and practices in New York, New York. Credentials: MD.
How much does Tanya Ellman, MD prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2024, Tanya Ellman, MD wrote 4,274 Medicare Part D claims totaling $4.1M in drug costs for 182 beneficiaries.
What is Tanya Ellman, MD's Medicare quality score?
Tanya Ellman, MD has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 100/100 (Quality: 86.8). The average MIPS Final Score across the 454,083 clinicians with at least one published category score is 83.5; clinicians whose score CMS assigned without scoring any category are excluded from that average. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Tanya Ellman, MD located?
Tanya Ellman, MD is located at 525 E 68TH ST # F24, New York, NY, 10065. Phone: (212) 746-4180.
What is Tanya Ellman, MD's NPI number?
Tanya Ellman, MD's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1366609711, issued on 05/21/2008.
Does Tanya Ellman, MD prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Tanya Ellman, MD's prescribing is 39% brand-name and 60% generic drugs by claim count, with $4.0M in brand drug costs.
Does Tanya Ellman, MD prescribe opioids?
Yes, Tanya Ellman, MD had 34 opioid claims in 2024 with an opioid prescribing rate of 0.8%.
How many Infectious Disease Physician providers are there in the US?
There are 8,537 Infectious Disease Physician providers across 54 states in the US. The average Infectious Disease Physician provider writes 807 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Tanya Ellman, MD prescribe most often?
Based on 2024 Medicare Part D data, Tanya Ellman, MD's most frequently prescribed drugs include Biktarvy, Atorvastatin Calcium, Losartan Potassium. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Tanya Ellman, MD accept Medicare?
Tanya Ellman, MD appears in CMS Medicare data with 4,274 Part D claims and 182 Medicare beneficiaries in 2024. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Tanya Ellman, MD's credentials?
Tanya Ellman, MD's NPI is 1366609711 with credentials MD. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

View source datasets and methodology notes
Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2024). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) - 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of August 2026 (NPPES) / 2024 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Every figure on PlainDoctor is rendered directly from the federal CMS NPPES registry, Medicare Part D, MIPS, and Open Payments records, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.