2026 NPPES data Registered Nurse NPI 1497417265 APRN
Verify on CMS →

Tara Frederick, APRN

Registered Nurse in Corbin, Kentucky. This profile is drawn from the federal National Provider Identifier Registry (CMS NPPES), which lists more than 7 million U.S. healthcare providers — including 175,652 in Registered Nurse, and covers specialty classification, practice address, and Medicare Part D prescribing data when reported. According to CMS, every field reflects the provider's official federal registration — see our methodology.

Federal data — no proprietary rating. We show these CMS records as-is — no composite score, no star rating, no editorial opinion layered on top.
Prescribing volume
101
Medicare Part D claims · 33 beneficiaries · Registered Nurse avg: 1K
Generic prescribing
71%
generic claims · 29% brand-name · higher generic rates reduce patient out-of-pocket costs
MIPS score
95.5/100
▲ 12 pts above national avg 83.1 · Exceptional
Industry payments
$82.73
5 payments · CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act)
Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.

What the federal data shows

Tara Frederick, APRN reported a CMS MIPS final score of 95.5/100 — above the 83.1 national average — and filed 101 Medicare Part D claims in 2023.

95.5/100
MIPS score · +12 vs avg
101
Part D claims, 2023
71%
generic prescribing
$82.73
industry payments (Sunshine Act)

Every figure on this page comes straight from federal CMS records (NPPES, Medicare Part D, MIPS, Open Payments) — no proprietary rating or editorial opinion is applied.

Tara Frederick, APRN's MIPS score vs every scored U.S. clinician

CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) final score, 2023 — the federal quality measure

96 Top 21% higher than 79% of 477,587 scored providers

0–10: 8,684 scored providers (2%). Below this entry. 10–20: 3,008 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 20–30: 3,069 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 30–40: 2,746 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 40–50: 2,928 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 50–60: 5,882 scored providers (1%). Below this entry. 60–70: 13,906 scored providers (3%). Below this entry. 70–80: 118,074 scored providers (25%). Below this entry. 80–90: 129,887 scored providers (27%). Below this entry. 90–100: 189,403 scored providers (40%). This entry sits in this band. This provider 0 100 every MIPS-scored clinician, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more scored providers. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) · 2023

Where Tara Frederick, APRN sits

This provider among registered nurse peers

Across the 3,327 registered nurse providers who report both Medicare Part D prescribing and a MIPS quality score, Tara Frederick, APRN writes more Part D claims than 24% of them and scores higher on MIPS quality than 82% — placing this provider in the lower-volume, high-quality quadrant. Volume reflects patient-panel size and specialty, not quality; the two axes are independent.

Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Lower volume · High qualityHigh volume · High qualityLower volume · Lower qualityHigh volume · Lower quality02550751000255075100Part D claim volume — percentile in specialtyMIPS quality — percentilePart D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 13 · MIPS quality — percentile: 98Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 97 · MIPS quality — percentile: 98Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 45 · MIPS quality — percentile: 58Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 25 · MIPS quality — percentile: 90Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 2 · MIPS quality — percentile: 13Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 48 · MIPS quality — percentile: 57Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 10 · MIPS quality — percentile: 65Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 100 · MIPS quality — percentile: 70Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 95 · MIPS quality — percentile: 72Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 40 · MIPS quality — percentile: 62Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 23 · MIPS quality — percentile: 73Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 65 · MIPS quality — percentile: 12Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 3 · MIPS quality — percentile: 3Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 77 · MIPS quality — percentile: 93Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 52 · MIPS quality — percentile: 87Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 68 · MIPS quality — percentile: 68Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 50 · MIPS quality — percentile: 77Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 80 · MIPS quality — percentile: 78Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 92 · MIPS quality — percentile: 15Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 78 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 5 · MIPS quality — percentile: 27Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 98 · MIPS quality — percentile: 95Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 42 · MIPS quality — percentile: 67Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 20 · MIPS quality — percentile: 42Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 38 · MIPS quality — percentile: 17Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 75 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 30 · MIPS quality — percentile: 83Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 37 · MIPS quality — percentile: 5Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 67 · MIPS quality — percentile: 75Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 27 · MIPS quality — percentile: 47Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 7 · MIPS quality — percentile: 60Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 8 · MIPS quality — percentile: 8Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 73 · MIPS quality — percentile: 53Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 93 · MIPS quality — percentile: 43Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 72 · MIPS quality — percentile: 22Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 90 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 58 · MIPS quality — percentile: 43Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 85 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 53 · MIPS quality — percentile: 28Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 63 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 28 · MIPS quality — percentile: 97Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 83 · MIPS quality — percentile: 2Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 70 · MIPS quality — percentile: 10Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 35 · MIPS quality — percentile: 25Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 57 · MIPS quality — percentile: 30Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 55 · MIPS quality — percentile: 52Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 88 · MIPS quality — percentile: 78Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 32 · MIPS quality — percentile: 7Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 22 · MIPS quality — percentile: 85Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 82 · MIPS quality — percentile: 50Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 87 · MIPS quality — percentile: 55Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 0 · MIPS quality — percentile: 48Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 62 · MIPS quality — percentile: 63Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 47 · MIPS quality — percentile: 32Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 12 · MIPS quality — percentile: 18Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 43 · MIPS quality — percentile: 23Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 60 · MIPS quality — percentile: 0Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 15 · MIPS quality — percentile: 82Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 17 · MIPS quality — percentile: 92Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 33 · MIPS quality — percentile: 20Tara Frederick, APRN — Part D claim volume — percentile in specialty: 24 · MIPS quality — percentile: 82
Part D claim volume vs MIPS quality, by specialty percentile

Each dot is one registered nurse peer from a representative sample of 60; the gold marker is Tara Frederick, APRN. Source: CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber data and the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, 2023.

What does the federal data show about Tara Frederick, APRN?

High performer (top quartile)

NPI registry status

Active

Issued 10/09/2021

NPI 1497417265

Primary specialty

Registered Nurse

High-volume

175,652 US NPIs in this specialty

Medicare Part D claims

101 90% vs specialty avg

2023 prescription claims

Specialty avg: 1,000

MIPS final score

95.5/100 12.4 pts vs avg

Exceptional band

vs 83.1 national avg

Specialty distribution in Kentucky

How Registered Nurse compares to other specialties among Kentucky providers

Kentucky providers

Largest specialties in Kentucky (% of in-state providers)

Family Nurse Practitioner — 5.9%Family Nurse Practitioner5.9%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program — 5.2%Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program5.2%Pharmacist — 4.8%Pharmacist4.8%Mental Health Counselor — 4.6%Mental Health Counselor4.6%Clinical Social Worker — 4.1%Clinical Social Worker4.1%Physical Therapist — 3.7%Physical Therapist3.7%Registered Nurse — 1.6%Registered Nurse1.6%
Largest specialties in Kentucky (% of in-state providers)

Medicare quality performance — MIPS

Tara Frederick, APRN's 2023 MIPS final score plotted against the Registered Nurse national average

High performer (top quartile)
MIPS Final Score
95.5/100
vs 83.1 national avg · 2023 performance year

MIPS final score (Registered Nurse) — 95.5/100 vs national avg 83.1

0%100%National avg83%95.5%
MIPS final score (Registered Nurse) — 95.5/100 vs national avg 83.1

The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores providers 0–100 across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities, weighted under 42 CFR §414.1380. Reporting is voluntary for many small practices, so absence of a MIPS score is not a quality signal.

Board certification through an ABMS or AOA member board signals voluntary post-licensure examination plus continuous Maintenance of Certification cycles. Verify any individual provider's status through certificationmatters.org (ABMS) or osteopathic.org (AOA).

Tara Frederick, APRN appears in the CMS NPPES registry as a Registered Nurse provider holding APRN credentials at 14949 N US HIGHWAY 25 E, Corbin, KY, 40701, with a listed phone of (606) 280-4212. NPI 1497417265 was issued on 10/09/2021. Because NPPES data is self-reported by the provider and refreshed monthly, the address, phone, and specialty reflect what Frederick most recently submitted to CMS rather than a vetted directory listing, which is why patients should always confirm the practice is still at this location before scheduling.

Medicare Part D records for calendar year 2023 show 101 prescription claims written by this provider, covering 33 Medicare beneficiaries and totaling roughly $9K in drug spend, split 29% brand-name and 71% generic by claim count. These figures capture only Medicare Part D — commercial insurance, Medicaid, and cash-pay prescriptions are not included, and any drug-beneficiary cell under 11 is suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. On the CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System, this provider earned a Final Score of 95.5/100 for the 2023 performance year (Quality 89.6), compared with the national average of 83.1.

Registered Nurse is a high-volume specialty nationwide, with 175,652 enrolled providers across 56 states and an average of 1,000 Part D claims per prescriber, so the context for interpreting these metrics differs meaningfully from a primary-care baseline. Important: PlainDoctor is a directory of publicly available government data, not medical advice, a malpractice database, or a quality rating. Inclusion here does not imply a recommendation, and absence of complaints or sanctions on this page does not mean none exist — always verify credentials through the NPPES NPI Registry, your state medical board, and the ABMS or AOA before making healthcare decisions.

Practice Address

14949 N US HIGHWAY 25 E
Corbin, KY 40701

Provider Details

NPI 1497417265
Specialty Registered Nurse
Credentials APRN
Gender Female
NPI Issued 10/09/2021

CMS Quality Score (MIPS)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) scores from CMS, 2023 performance year.

95.5077
Final Score
Avg: 83.1
89.5953
Quality
100
Promoting Interoperability

Reporting: Alternative Payment Model

Industry payments received (2024) — CMS Open Payments transparency data

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (part of the Affordable Care Act) requires drug and medical-device manufacturers + group purchasing organizations to publicly report payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The data below covers 2024 for Tara Frederick, APRN. Source: openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.

Total received

$83

Largest payer

Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc

Most common payment type

Food and Beverage

Industry payments are not necessarily indicators of bias — they include research funding, consulting fees for evidence-based work, royalties for inventions, food at conferences, and similar items. The disclosure exists for transparency. Read our methodology for how we interpret this data.

Brand vs generic prescribing mix · Above average

Tara Frederick, APRN — brand share 29.0%
Registered Nurse average

29% brand-name claims vs 71% generic, on 101 2023 Medicare Part D claims.

The federal Medicare Part D Generic Dispensing Rate national benchmark sits near 90% generic / 10% brand for primary-care prescribers, per CMS Office of the Actuary 2024 estimates. Higher brand share is common in specialty prescribing where generic equivalents are not available.

Medicare Part D Prescribing Data

CMS Medicare Part D prescriber-level data for calendar year 2023.

101
Total Claims
$9K
Total Drug Cost
33
Medicare Beneficiaries

Prescribing Breakdown

30-Day Fills
114
Total Day Supply
2,469
Brand vs Generic
29% brand / 71% generic
Brand Drug Cost
$6K
Generic Drug Cost
$4K
Antibiotic Claims
18

Patient Demographics

Average Patient Age
58.9 years
Avg HCC Risk Score
1.14
Gender Split
100% female / 0% male
Age Distribution
<65: 18, 65-74: 11, 75-84: N/A, 85+: N/A

Top Prescribed Drugs (Medicare Part D)

Top drugs by claim count for calendar year 2023. Based on Medicare Part D data only.

Drug Claims
Clobetasol Propionate
27

* Counts below 11 are suppressed by CMS for patient privacy. Generic names shown where available from CMS Part D data.

Registered Nurse Overview

How Tara Frederick, APRN fits within the Registered Nurse landscape nationally.

175,652
Registered Nurse Providers in US
56
States with Registered Nurse
1,000
Avg Claims per Provider

Tara Frederick, APRN's 101 claims are below the specialty average of 1,000.

Nearby Registered Nurse Providers in Kentucky

Other clinicians with the same primary specialty enrolled in Kentucky, drawn from the same CMS NPPES roster as Frederick.

Compare Registered Nurse nationally: see state-by-state distribution →

Before you book an appointment

Use this federal record as your verification checklist, not as a recommendation.

  • Confirm the NPI record is current in the official CMS registry — providers update their own NPPES details, and moves can lag. Verify this NPI
  • Check the active license and any disciplinary history with the Kentucky medical board — federal registration is not a license check. Credential verification guide
  • Weigh a second option: compare this provider with a nearby Registered Nurse peer on Medicare volume and prescribing patterns. Compare providers

Medicare Part D and MIPS figures describe practice patterns in federal programs only — they are not quality ratings, and PlainDoctor does not rate, rank, or recommend providers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Tara Frederick, APRN's specialty?
Tara Frederick, APRN specializes in Registered Nurse and practices in Corbin, Kentucky. Credentials: APRN.
How much does Tara Frederick, APRN prescribe under Medicare Part D?
In 2023, Tara Frederick, APRN wrote 101 Medicare Part D claims totaling $9K in drug costs for 33 beneficiaries.
What is Tara Frederick, APRN's Medicare quality score?
Tara Frederick, APRN has a CMS MIPS Final Score of 95.5/100 (Quality: 89.6). The national average MIPS Final Score is 83.1. Source: CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) 2023.
Where is Tara Frederick, APRN located?
Tara Frederick, APRN is located at 14949 N US HIGHWAY 25 E, Corbin, KY, 40701. Phone: (606) 280-4212.
What is Tara Frederick, APRN's NPI number?
Tara Frederick, APRN's National Provider Identifier (NPI) is 1497417265, issued on 10/09/2021.
Does Tara Frederick, APRN prescribe more brand-name or generic drugs?
Tara Frederick, APRN's prescribing is 29% brand-name and 71% generic drugs by claim count, with $6K in brand drug costs.
How many Registered Nurse providers are there in the US?
There are 175,652 Registered Nurse providers across 56 states in the US. The average Registered Nurse provider writes 1,000 Medicare Part D claims per year.
What drugs does Tara Frederick, APRN prescribe most often?
Based on 2023 Medicare Part D data, Tara Frederick, APRN's most frequently prescribed drugs include Clobetasol Propionate. This reflects Medicare Part D prescriptions only and does not include commercial insurance or other payer types.
Does Tara Frederick, APRN accept Medicare?
Tara Frederick, APRN appears in CMS Medicare data with 101 Part D claims and 33 Medicare beneficiaries in 2023. Contact the provider's office directly to confirm current Medicare enrollment and accepted plans.
How can I verify Tara Frederick, APRN's credentials?
Tara Frederick, APRN's NPI is 1497417265 with credentials APRN. You can verify this through the NPPES NPI Registry, check state medical board records, and confirm board certification through the ABMS or AOA.

Data Sources

Provider Directory
CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), download.cms.gov/nppes, updated monthly. Contains NPI, specialty, credentials, and practice location.
Specialty Classification
NUCC Health Care Provider Taxonomy (nucc.org), the industry standard for classifying provider specialties in Medicare and Medicaid billing.
Prescribing Data
CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File (2023). Includes claims, drug costs, beneficiaries, and opioid prescribing rates.
Quality Performance
CMS Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) — 2023 performance year.
Limitations
Provider data is self-reported to CMS. Prescribing data reflects Medicare Part D only and does not include commercial insurance, Medicaid, or cash prescriptions. Claims below 11 beneficiaries are suppressed by CMS for privacy.

See our complete data methodology for details on how we collect and process government data.

Data as of April 2026 (NPPES) / 2023 (Medicare Part D). Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Disclaimer: Data from CMS NPPES and Medicare Part D. PlainDoctor does not rate or rank providers. Provider information is self-reported and may not be current. Always verify information directly with the provider. About · Methodology

Compiled from official public sources by the PlainDoctor editorial team.